Skip to content
Project 2025
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories
Citizens in Name Only: What the Supreme Court Can’t Fix

Citizens in Name Only: What the Supreme Court Can’t Fix

Rioters breach Capitol security Jan. 6

Trump’s 1776 Slush Fund Shows a New Level of Executive Abuse

The American Experiment at the Brink Due To Minority Rule

The American Experiment at the Brink Due To Minority Rule

Voter Information Requirement Could Hinder Arizona Mail-In Ballots

News

Voter Information Requirement Could Hinder Arizona Mail-In Ballots

Arizona permits some elections to be conducted entirely by mail-in balloting, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

(Adobe Stock)
Mark Moran
By Mark MoranJun 24, 2026
Mark Moran
Mark Moran is a contributor for The Fulcrum, a nonpartisan publication dedicated to strengthening democracy by fostering informed civic engagement and elevating diverse perspectives.
See More Writings by author

Arizona voting rights advocates are resisting President Donald Trump’s executive order directing the U.S. Postal Service not to deliver mail-in ballots to residents if a state refuses to send its voter rolls to Washington.

The Trump administration said the order is part of an effort to ensure voting integrity. In Arizona, 84% of voters cast their ballots by mail in the 2024 presidential election.

Adrian Fontes, Arizona's Secretary of State, called any attempt to hinder mail voting unconstitutional and described it as an effort by the Trump administration to manipulate elections.

“It’s the administration’s attempt to pick their own voters,” Fontes contended. “They don’t want their voters to be disabled veterans or older folks. They don’t want their voters to be from rural Arizona. This is a time-tested method by which Arizonans vote. We like it this way.”

The mail-in ballot executive order comes amid Trump’s efforts to make sweeping changes to how elections are handled. He has also supported efforts to require new citizenship verification for voter registration. The president has said he is trying to safeguard the integrity of the election system.

Brian Lemek, founder and executive director of the group Defend the Vote, said any attempt to suppress voting, including mail-in balloting, could have major effects in Arizona because of the state’s vast geography, population and hostile climate.

“The heat is one issue, but just massive, massive populations that are out in these rural areas and in these Indigenous communities will also be disproportionately impacted by any sort of further restrictions here,” Lemek emphasized.

Fontes added the state is considering its legal options to stop the executive order from taking effect in Arizona.

Voter information requirement could hinder Arizona mail-in ballots was first published by PNS and republished with permission.

Mark Moran is a producer with Public News Service.


Latest news

The U.S. Pentagon.
Media & Technology

America Should Stay Single

Juneteenth National Holiday Celebrated In Brooklyn, New York
Democracy

Juneteenth: Delayed Not Denied

Independence Day 250: Why America Needs an Independent Caucus
Democracy

Independence Day 250: Why America Needs an Independent Caucus

AI Could Save Thousands—So Why Is Healthcare Still Hitting the Brakes?
Media & Technology

AI Could Save Thousands—So Why Is Healthcare Still Hitting the Brakes?

Read More

If the GOP Closes Its Primary, Taxpayers Should Close Their Wallets

wallet with dollar bills, on top of an American flag

hartcreations/Getty Images

If the GOP Closes Its Primary, Taxpayers Should Close Their Wallets

A recent court ruling allowing the Colorado Republican Party to decide how and whether to close its primary elections comes at a pivotal moment for the state’s election system. For nearly a decade, Colorado has had an open primary; one designed to reflect the state’s growing share of independent voters. The decision now raises a fundamental question: should taxpayers continue to fund an election that restricts large numbers of the public?

Colorado’s primary elections are not private affairs. They are administered by the state, financed by taxpayers, and conducted through public infrastructure. Ballots are printed and mailed by government offices. Election workers are trained and compensated with public funds. In every functional sense, primaries are public elections.

Keep Reading Show less
Nevada pro-democracy groups condemn SAVE Act

Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., speaks at a press event about free and fair elections. A recent study from MIT ranked Nevada second in the nation for quality of election administration, based on measures of accessibility and security.

(Battle Born Progress)

Nevada pro-democracy groups condemn SAVE Act

President Donald Trump has made passing the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act a top priority before the midterms but supporters of safe and fair elections in the Silver State said it would be a disaster for democracy.

The bill, which purports to combat noncitizen voting, would make it much harder to register to vote. It passed the U.S. House but is stalled in the Senate.

Keep Reading Show less
How A 2022 Law Changed Election Certification: Assessing the Electoral Count Reform Act

A sign that reads: Voting

E4C

How A 2022 Law Changed Election Certification: Assessing the Electoral Count Reform Act

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • The Electoral Count Reform (ECRA) of 2022 modernizes the 1887 Electoral Count Act, which governed how Congress counts Electoral College votes. The original Act has been widely criticized as vague and susceptible to exploitation.
  • The ECRA clarifies that the Vice President’s role is ceremonial, raises the objection threshold to 20 percent of both chambers, and designates governors as responsible for submitting elector certificates.
  • Supporters argue that the bipartisan reform prevents future election disputes and protects democratic stability, while critics contend that it was rushed, doesn’t address deeper election integrity issues, and raises concerns about federalism.
  • The Act reflects bipartisan cooperation but continues debates about federalism and the balance of power between states and Congress.

The Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act (ECRA) was introduced by Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) in July 2022 and signed into law by President Joe Biden in December 2022. It is a reform to the Electoral Count Act of 1887 (ECA), a law that governs how Congress counts the Electoral College votes for president every four years. The Act is also a response to President Donald Trump’s efforts to dispute the 2020 presidential election results, which revealed several gaps in the law that could be exploited by a presidential candidate.

Keep Reading Show less
The Bipartisan War on Independent Voters
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

The Bipartisan War on Independent Voters

The Washington Post editorial board penned a bold piece (Bill Cassidy and America’s Increasingly Broken Primary System) in the wake of President Trump’s successful vendetta against the Louisiana Senator. They could have taken the easy route and pointed a finger at the Republicans. Instead, they took issue with both parties and their insatiable appetite to control the rules of the game and punish anyone who steps out of line.

In a media landscape dominated by partisan propaganda, it’s refreshing to read an opinion piece that encourages readers to actually look at what’s happening.

Keep Reading Show less