Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Voter Information Requirement Could Hinder Arizona Mail-In Ballots

News

Voter Information Requirement Could Hinder Arizona Mail-In Ballots

Arizona permits some elections to be conducted entirely by mail-in balloting, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

(Adobe Stock)

Arizona voting rights advocates are resisting President Donald Trump’s executive order directing the U.S. Postal Service not to deliver mail-in ballots to residents if a state refuses to send its voter rolls to Washington.

The Trump administration said the order is part of an effort to ensure voting integrity. In Arizona, 84% of voters cast their ballots by mail in the 2024 presidential election.


Adrian Fontes, Arizona's Secretary of State, called any attempt to hinder mail voting unconstitutional and described it as an effort by the Trump administration to manipulate elections.

“It’s the administration’s attempt to pick their own voters,” Fontes contended. “They don’t want their voters to be disabled veterans or older folks. They don’t want their voters to be from rural Arizona. This is a time-tested method by which Arizonans vote. We like it this way.”

The mail-in ballot executive order comes amid Trump’s efforts to make sweeping changes to how elections are handled. He has also supported efforts to require new citizenship verification for voter registration. The president has said he is trying to safeguard the integrity of the election system.

Brian Lemek, founder and executive director of the group Defend the Vote, said any attempt to suppress voting, including mail-in balloting, could have major effects in Arizona because of the state’s vast geography, population and hostile climate.

“The heat is one issue, but just massive, massive populations that are out in these rural areas and in these Indigenous communities will also be disproportionately impacted by any sort of further restrictions here,” Lemek emphasized.

Fontes added the state is considering its legal options to stop the executive order from taking effect in Arizona.

Voter information requirement could hinder Arizona mail-in ballots was first published by PNS and republished with permission.

Mark Moran is a producer with Public News Service.


Read More

The New Fight Over Election Observation
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

The New Fight Over Election Observation

As a member of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the U.S. has signed the foundational agreement committing all participating states to open elections to external scrutiny and inviting fellow members to observe through the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR). The 2024 ODIHR observation mission to the U.S. found the fundamentals reassuring—a well-run process, active engagement, free campaigning—but issued 31 recommendations to align U.S. elections with international standards and commitments. Four stand out: federal pre-clearance legislation against discriminatory election-law changes; reassessing the Electoral College; balanced representation in election administration; and guaranteed access for international and nonpartisan observers—notable, since 17 states still legally bar international observation, which is at odds with commitments made by all 57 OSCE states. Yet over a year later, follow-through is thin: no pre-clearance restoration, no Electoral College review, unchanged observer-access laws. Where movement exists—in disinformation tools, in financial disclosure—it remains piecemeal.

An uncomfortable convergence

Keep ReadingShow less
Aspirations for the American Experiment Versus the Save Act of 2026
a person is casting a vote into a box

Aspirations for the American Experiment Versus the Save Act of 2026

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act stands as the direct antithesis of our founders' aspirations for the American Experiment, eroding the core principles of popular sovereignty and individual liberty. Rather than cultivating a government that derives its "just powers from the consent of the governed," this legislative measure inverts that relationship. It transforms a natural right into a government-administered privilege, erecting bureaucratic barriers that conflict with the expansive, participatory democratic republic the Framers sought to construct.

Subverting the Consent of the Governed: the foundational premise of the American Experiment, as articulated by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence, is that the legitimacy of a government hinges entirely on the active consent of its citizens. The SAVE Act disrupts this dynamic by fundamentally shifting the burden of proof.

Keep ReadingShow less
10 Organizations Independent Voters Need to Watch

Young woman at voting booth

Canva

10 Organizations Independent Voters Need to Watch

Independent voters are no longer a political afterthought. They are the majority.

And when these voters look at the state of politics in the US, they see the lack of accountability, representation, competition, and meaningful choice that the system produces.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Gerrymandering Solution
person holding white and red box

The Gerrymandering Solution

The 250th anniversary of American independence should remind us what’s wrong with gerrymandering. Due to partisanship, however, it now not only persists but rachets tighter in a tit-for-tat cycle that threatens to strangle representative rule. There is a solution to gerrymandering, however, if only politicians will act.

Inspired by revolutionary Enlightenment Era ideals, the Declaration of Independence and the new state constitutions of 1776 call for representative rule. The people would be sovereign, they proclaimed, with governments drawing their just powers from the consent of the governed. Nothing of the sort had ever been tried on a large scale and the founders struggled with how to implement it. Everything turned on establishing a truly representative governing assembly for each newly independent colony or state.

Keep ReadingShow less