Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Nevada pro-democracy groups condemn SAVE Act

News

Nevada pro-democracy groups condemn SAVE Act

Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., speaks at a press event about free and fair elections. A recent study from MIT ranked Nevada second in the nation for quality of election administration, based on measures of accessibility and security.

(Battle Born Progress)

President Donald Trump has made passing the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act a top priority before the midterms but supporters of safe and fair elections in the Silver State said it would be a disaster for democracy.

The bill, which purports to combat noncitizen voting, would make it much harder to register to vote. It passed the U.S. House but is stalled in the Senate.


Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., said the bill also directs the states to turn their voter lists over to the federal government.

"It gives the Department of Homeland Security information about our voter rolls that the department has been trying to get across this country for the last several months," Cortez Masto explained. "Because they want to be able to go through those voter rolls and decide for themselves who's eligible to vote and who's not.

In a recent social media post, Trump reiterated calls for severe restrictions on mail-in voting, claiming elections are rigged. Nevada mails a ballot to all registered voters, and state data show 45% returned them via mail in the 2024 primary. The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act would require people who want to register to vote or update their registration to present either a birth certificate or a passport in person at the county elections office.

Lisa Lynn Chapman, research manager for the advocacy group Battle Born Progress, said the in-person requirement would be a big barrier for people with mobility issues.

"This is very personal to me," Chapman explained. "I can't walk for long distances, nor can I stand for more than about two minutes. It makes it almost impossible for me to be able to vote because I can't stand in those lines."

Trump also wants people to have to present a photo ID when they vote and in most states, a driver’s license, real ID or student ID would not be sufficient.

Kerry Durmick, Nevada state director for the nonprofit All Voting is Local Action, said the expense and hassle of getting a passport or birth certificate would keep a lot of people from the polls.

"Half of American citizens do not have a passport," Durmick pointed out. "There are also 69 million women who don't have a birth certificate that matches their current legal name, and there are more than 21 million citizens who don't have either of these documents readily available."

Trump also issued an executive order directing the Postal Service to send mail-in ballots only to people on a new, nationally approved voter list. Nevada’s Attorney General Aaron Ford has refused to turn over the data and the issue is now in court.

Nevada pro-democracy groups condemn SAVE Act was originally published by the Public News Service and is republished with permission.

Suzanne Potter is a journalist with 30 years of experience as a reporter for TV, radio and print news.


Read More

​Michael Bridgford

Michael Bridgford campaigning

Independent Underdog Tours Iowa as Voters Seek Common‑Sense Change

Eight cities in eight different counties, all in one week. When we talk about cities in Iowa’s First Congressional District, keep in mind most are county seats with populations that often don’t reach 7,000. In the closing months of a political campaign in southeastern Iowa, chatter in those towns and cities centers on the cost of living, farmers' struggles, and the hot-button issue of data centers.

Michael Bridgford is tireless, but the challenge is daunting. I met him over lunch last spring when he was first considering a run. A long-time friend met him at a conference and told Michael he would connect him to a guy who won a long-shot campaign. I’m that guy. Running as a Republican, I upset a 32-year incumbent in deep-blue Madison, Wisconsin.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Rep. Young Kim (R-CA)

U.S. Rep. Young Kim (R-CA) speaks during a news conference in front of the U.S. Capitol to commemorate the 36th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square protests and massacre on June 4, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Kim removed references to Trump and his “America First” agenda from her campaign site and materials.

(Alex Wong/Getty Images/TNS)

GOP candidates are rushing to rebrand before November’s midterms

“If you want to know what a politician is up to, watch his feet, not his mouth,” historian Marvin Meyers wrote in his magisterial “The Jacksonian Persuasion” in 1957.

It’s still good advice. In private conversations, Republicans are talking a big game about how they’re not worried about November’s midterms, according to several informed sources I’ve talked to. But it’s not just in private. “Today, I don’t think there will be a blue wave at all,” White House Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair told the Free Press earlier this month. Blair is the man tasked with overseeing the midterms for President Trump’s MAGA Inc. super-PAC.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Close up of white ballot box with American flag in the background

Close up of white ballot box with American flag in the background during US Midterm Congressional Elections 2026.

Getty Images

National Security Leaders Sound Alarm on Armed Election Deployments

With Election Day approaching, concerns continue to mount over the possibility that the Trump administration could deploy armed federal agents to election sites. Democratic leaders, the NAACP, and the American Civil Liberties Union have already raised alarms, filing lawsuits after senior administration officials repeatedly refused to rule out sending armed federal agents or immigration officers to polling places during the 2026 midterm elections.

A Warning from National Security Leaders

On September 14th, National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A)—a nonpartisan network of more than 1,600 senior national security professionals, including retired admirals, generals, senior enlisted leaders, intelligence officers, diplomats, and civilian service officials—issued an unusually direct call to action. They urged state attorneys general to prepare now to seek emergency injunctive relief if the federal government takes identifiable steps toward deploying uniformed military forces or massed armed federal law enforcement personnel into major American cities in connection with the November elections.

Keep ReadingShow less