Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Nevada pro-democracy groups condemn SAVE Act

News

Nevada pro-democracy groups condemn SAVE Act

Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., speaks at a press event about free and fair elections. A recent study from MIT ranked Nevada second in the nation for quality of election administration, based on measures of accessibility and security.

(Battle Born Progress)

President Donald Trump has made passing the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act a top priority before the midterms but supporters of safe and fair elections in the Silver State said it would be a disaster for democracy.

The bill, which purports to combat noncitizen voting, would make it much harder to register to vote. It passed the U.S. House but is stalled in the Senate.


Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., said the bill also directs the states to turn their voter lists over to the federal government.

"It gives the Department of Homeland Security information about our voter rolls that the department has been trying to get across this country for the last several months," Cortez Masto explained. "Because they want to be able to go through those voter rolls and decide for themselves who's eligible to vote and who's not.

In a recent social media post, Trump reiterated calls for severe restrictions on mail-in voting, claiming elections are rigged. Nevada mails a ballot to all registered voters, and state data show 45% returned them via mail in the 2024 primary. The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act would require people who want to register to vote or update their registration to present either a birth certificate or a passport in person at the county elections office.

Lisa Lynn Chapman, research manager for the advocacy group Battle Born Progress, said the in-person requirement would be a big barrier for people with mobility issues.

"This is very personal to me," Chapman explained. "I can't walk for long distances, nor can I stand for more than about two minutes. It makes it almost impossible for me to be able to vote because I can't stand in those lines."

Trump also wants people to have to present a photo ID when they vote and in most states, a driver’s license, real ID or student ID would not be sufficient.

Kerry Durmick, Nevada state director for the nonprofit All Voting is Local Action, said the expense and hassle of getting a passport or birth certificate would keep a lot of people from the polls.

"Half of American citizens do not have a passport," Durmick pointed out. "There are also 69 million women who don't have a birth certificate that matches their current legal name, and there are more than 21 million citizens who don't have either of these documents readily available."

Trump also issued an executive order directing the Postal Service to send mail-in ballots only to people on a new, nationally approved voter list. Nevada’s Attorney General Aaron Ford has refused to turn over the data and the issue is now in court.

Nevada pro-democracy groups condemn SAVE Act was originally published by the Public News Service and is republished with permission.

Suzanne Potter is a journalist with 30 years of experience as a reporter for TV, radio and print news.


Read More

Aspirations for the American Experiment Versus the Save Act of 2026
a person is casting a vote into a box

Aspirations for the American Experiment Versus the Save Act of 2026

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act stands as the direct antithesis of our founders' aspirations for the American Experiment, eroding the core principles of popular sovereignty and individual liberty. Rather than cultivating a government that derives its "just powers from the consent of the governed," this legislative measure inverts that relationship. It transforms a natural right into a government-administered privilege, erecting bureaucratic barriers that conflict with the expansive, participatory democratic republic the Framers sought to construct.

Subverting the Consent of the Governed: the foundational premise of the American Experiment, as articulated by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence, is that the legitimacy of a government hinges entirely on the active consent of its citizens. The SAVE Act disrupts this dynamic by fundamentally shifting the burden of proof.

Keep ReadingShow less
10 Organizations Independent Voters Need to Watch

Young woman at voting booth

Canva

10 Organizations Independent Voters Need to Watch

Independent voters are no longer a political afterthought. They are the majority.

And when these voters look at the state of politics in the US, they see the lack of accountability, representation, competition, and meaningful choice that the system produces.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Gerrymandering Solution
person holding white and red box

The Gerrymandering Solution

The 250th anniversary of American independence should remind us what’s wrong with gerrymandering. Due to partisanship, however, it now not only persists but rachets tighter in a tit-for-tat cycle that threatens to strangle representative rule. There is a solution to gerrymandering, however, if only politicians will act.

Inspired by revolutionary Enlightenment Era ideals, the Declaration of Independence and the new state constitutions of 1776 call for representative rule. The people would be sovereign, they proclaimed, with governments drawing their just powers from the consent of the governed. Nothing of the sort had ever been tried on a large scale and the founders struggled with how to implement it. Everything turned on establishing a truly representative governing assembly for each newly independent colony or state.

Keep ReadingShow less
Voting rights groups hail SCOTUS decision on ballot grace period

California sends mail-in ballots to all registered voters unless they opt out.

(Adobe Stock)

Voting rights groups hail SCOTUS decision on ballot grace period

Voting rights experts are praising a U.S. Supreme Court decision Monday, which upheld a state’s right to set a grace period for counting mail-in ballots arriving after Election Day, as long as they were postmarked on time.

The challengers to Mississippi’s grace period argued accepting ballots after Election Day threatens election integrity. Supporters of the decision said the U.S. Constitution delegates election administration to the states.

Keep ReadingShow less