Skip to content
Project 2025
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories
Citizens in Name Only: What the Supreme Court Can’t Fix

Citizens in Name Only: What the Supreme Court Can’t Fix

The American Experiment at the Brink Due To Minority Rule

The American Experiment at the Brink Due To Minority Rule

Nevada pro-democracy groups condemn SAVE Act

News

Nevada pro-democracy groups condemn SAVE Act

Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., speaks at a press event about free and fair elections. A recent study from MIT ranked Nevada second in the nation for quality of election administration, based on measures of accessibility and security.

(Battle Born Progress)
Suzanne Potter
By Suzanne PotterJun 10, 2026
Suzanne Potter
Suzanne Potter is a contributor for The Fulcrum, a nonpartisan publication dedicated to strengthening democracy by fostering informed civic engagement and elevating diverse perspectives.
See More Writings by author

President Donald Trump has made passing the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act a top priority before the midterms but supporters of safe and fair elections in the Silver State said it would be a disaster for democracy.

The bill, which purports to combat noncitizen voting, would make it much harder to register to vote. It passed the U.S. House but is stalled in the Senate.

Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., said the bill also directs the states to turn their voter lists over to the federal government.

"It gives the Department of Homeland Security information about our voter rolls that the department has been trying to get across this country for the last several months," Cortez Masto explained. "Because they want to be able to go through those voter rolls and decide for themselves who's eligible to vote and who's not.

In a recent social media post, Trump reiterated calls for severe restrictions on mail-in voting, claiming elections are rigged. Nevada mails a ballot to all registered voters, and state data show 45% returned them via mail in the 2024 primary. The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act would require people who want to register to vote or update their registration to present either a birth certificate or a passport in person at the county elections office.

Lisa Lynn Chapman, research manager for the advocacy group Battle Born Progress, said the in-person requirement would be a big barrier for people with mobility issues.

"This is very personal to me," Chapman explained. "I can't walk for long distances, nor can I stand for more than about two minutes. It makes it almost impossible for me to be able to vote because I can't stand in those lines."

Trump also wants people to have to present a photo ID when they vote and in most states, a driver’s license, real ID or student ID would not be sufficient.

Kerry Durmick, Nevada state director for the nonprofit All Voting is Local Action, said the expense and hassle of getting a passport or birth certificate would keep a lot of people from the polls.

"Half of American citizens do not have a passport," Durmick pointed out. "There are also 69 million women who don't have a birth certificate that matches their current legal name, and there are more than 21 million citizens who don't have either of these documents readily available."

Trump also issued an executive order directing the Postal Service to send mail-in ballots only to people on a new, nationally approved voter list. Nevada’s Attorney General Aaron Ford has refused to turn over the data and the issue is now in court.

Nevada pro-democracy groups condemn SAVE Act was originally published by the Public News Service and is republished with permission.

Suzanne Potter is a journalist with 30 years of experience as a reporter for TV, radio and print news.


Latest news

A miniature residence of the President of the United States, the White House, against the backdrop of 100 US dollar bills.
Economy

Trump’s State Capitalism Marks a Radical Break in U.S. Policy

Elks, Rotarians, and Both Party’s Lust for Control
Elections

Elks, Rotarians, and Both Party’s Lust for Control

Protesters interact with Capitol Police inside the U.S. Capitol Building on January 6, 2021.
Rule of Law

Potential Trump Slush Fund Is Another Example of Trump Tyranny

Storytelling Is Foundational to Keeping Our Democracy Intact
Democracy

Storytelling Is Foundational to Keeping Our Democracy Intact

Read More

Voter Information Requirement Could Hinder Arizona Mail-In Ballots

Arizona permits some elections to be conducted entirely by mail-in balloting, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

(Adobe Stock)

Voter Information Requirement Could Hinder Arizona Mail-In Ballots

Arizona voting rights advocates are resisting President Donald Trump’s executive order directing the U.S. Postal Service not to deliver mail-in ballots to residents if a state refuses to send its voter rolls to Washington.

The Trump administration said the order is part of an effort to ensure voting integrity. In Arizona, 84% of voters cast their ballots by mail in the 2024 presidential election.

Keep ReadingShow less
If the GOP Closes Its Primary, Taxpayers Should Close Their Wallets

wallet with dollar bills, on top of an American flag

hartcreations/Getty Images

If the GOP Closes Its Primary, Taxpayers Should Close Their Wallets

A recent court ruling allowing the Colorado Republican Party to decide how and whether to close its primary elections comes at a pivotal moment for the state’s election system. For nearly a decade, Colorado has had an open primary; one designed to reflect the state’s growing share of independent voters. The decision now raises a fundamental question: should taxpayers continue to fund an election that restricts large numbers of the public?

Colorado’s primary elections are not private affairs. They are administered by the state, financed by taxpayers, and conducted through public infrastructure. Ballots are printed and mailed by government offices. Election workers are trained and compensated with public funds. In every functional sense, primaries are public elections.

Keep ReadingShow less
How A 2022 Law Changed Election Certification: Assessing the Electoral Count Reform Act

A sign that reads: Voting

E4C

How A 2022 Law Changed Election Certification: Assessing the Electoral Count Reform Act

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • The Electoral Count Reform (ECRA) of 2022 modernizes the 1887 Electoral Count Act, which governed how Congress counts Electoral College votes. The original Act has been widely criticized as vague and susceptible to exploitation.
  • The ECRA clarifies that the Vice President’s role is ceremonial, raises the objection threshold to 20 percent of both chambers, and designates governors as responsible for submitting elector certificates.
  • Supporters argue that the bipartisan reform prevents future election disputes and protects democratic stability, while critics contend that it was rushed, doesn’t address deeper election integrity issues, and raises concerns about federalism.
  • The Act reflects bipartisan cooperation but continues debates about federalism and the balance of power between states and Congress.

The Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act (ECRA) was introduced by Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) in July 2022 and signed into law by President Joe Biden in December 2022. It is a reform to the Electoral Count Act of 1887 (ECA), a law that governs how Congress counts the Electoral College votes for president every four years. The Act is also a response to President Donald Trump’s efforts to dispute the 2020 presidential election results, which revealed several gaps in the law that could be exploited by a presidential candidate.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Bipartisan War on Independent Voters
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

The Bipartisan War on Independent Voters

The Washington Post editorial board penned a bold piece (Bill Cassidy and America’s Increasingly Broken Primary System) in the wake of President Trump’s successful vendetta against the Louisiana Senator. They could have taken the easy route and pointed a finger at the Republicans. Instead, they took issue with both parties and their insatiable appetite to control the rules of the game and punish anyone who steps out of line.

In a media landscape dominated by partisan propaganda, it’s refreshing to read an opinion piece that encourages readers to actually look at what’s happening.

Keep ReadingShow less
© Copyright 2026