Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

After huge progressive Michigan win, El-Sayed faces a tougher test

Opinion

After huge progressive Michigan win, El-Sayed faces a tougher test

Democratic Senate primary winner Abdul El-Sayed arrives to a press conference in front of the Spirit of Detroit statue on Aug. 5, 2026, in Detroit, Michigan. El-Sayed called on Michiganders to unite against Mike Rodgers as well as challenging him to multiple debates.

(Finn Gomez/Getty Images/TCA)

Far-left progressive Abdul El-Sayed is the Democratic nominee for Senate in Michigan, a swing state that Donald Trump won twice.

It was the first major test of an ascendant progressive wing of the Democratic Party looking to see how far they could push their agenda outside of liberal strongholds like New York City — and he passed it. But just barely, and the warning signs on the horizon are flashing red.


See, El-Sayed defeated moderate Rep. Haley Stevens by just a percentage point — winning 48.5% of the vote to her 47.5% — and thereby winning a plurality of the Democratic vote, not a majority.

That means he’s got some work to do between now and November.

He’s, as my colleague and Michigan native Jamal Simmons put it, a very talented “political athlete,” but Michigan Democrats — like all Democrats, it seems — are deeply divided on which direction to take the country, and which messages will work best to win big in November. And you better believe the general election will expose all the ugly and treacherous fault lines.

While the issue of Israel has been front-and-center — intentionally put there by many progressives who believe it a defining one, for better or worse — there are other divides in the party that candidates like El-Sayed will have to reckon with, and quickly.

One of the major schisms on the left right now is between progressives and Black voters, many of whom, especially older Black voters, aren’t supportive of the socialist agenda these candidates are openly pushing, and prefer instead moderate candidates who are focused on kitchen-table issues.

To wit, Stevens was leading among Black voters in Michigan by a whopping 46 points before the primary, and she delivered them on Tuesday night.

Of the 12 Michigan counties with large Black voter populations, El-Sayed won just five, and Stevens won seven. He also lost all of metro Detroit, the state’s largest Black-majority city, where Stevens won handily, by 60%.

El-Sayed and another far-left progressive candidate — William Lawrence, who also won his primary in Michigan’s 7th District — have earned the ire of Black leadership, with revered party elder Rep. Jim Clyburn scolding the former for not having more Black support at his rallies. Likewise, a PAC for the Congressional Black Caucus also released a statement telling their supporters not to vote for Lawrence over comments he made about Israel and Black leadership.

So, suffice it to say, El-Sayed will have to do what other progressives like Sen. Bernie Sanders could not — bring Black voters out to cast their ballots for him.

The questions, if not the answers, are clear. With Stevens out, will moderate Black voters simply stay home? Could they possibly vote for Republican Mike Rogers, who lost to moderate Dem Elissa Slotkin in 2024 by less than .3%?

Will Black leaders like Clyburn change their tune about El-Sayed now that he’s officially the nominee? If New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s race was any indication, the answer is no — Clyburn endorsed his rival, the more moderate Andrew Cuomo in that election.

Can El-Sayed and others, who had to run far to the left to engage their base in a primary, make an effective pivot to the center in time for November? Will they risk alienating their supporters if they do?

It’s a tricky road ahead for an energized and emboldened group of candidates who are about to test out messages and agendas to a much wider audience, and fend off all the scrutiny that comes with that.

Either El-Sayed will prove this new wave of progressives could be key to turning swing states blue, retaking the majority, and reinvigorating a lackluster Democratic Party, or Dems will be wishing, come November, that they stuck with the safer choice.

S.E. Cupp is the host of "S.E. Cupp Unfiltered" on CNN.


Read More

U.S. Rep. Young Kim (R-CA)

U.S. Rep. Young Kim (R-CA) speaks during a news conference in front of the U.S. Capitol to commemorate the 36th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square protests and massacre on June 4, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Kim removed references to Trump and his “America First” agenda from her campaign site and materials.

(Alex Wong/Getty Images/TNS)

GOP candidates are rushing to rebrand before November’s midterms

“If you want to know what a politician is up to, watch his feet, not his mouth,” historian Marvin Meyers wrote in his magisterial “The Jacksonian Persuasion” in 1957.

It’s still good advice. In private conversations, Republicans are talking a big game about how they’re not worried about November’s midterms, according to several informed sources I’ve talked to. But it’s not just in private. “Today, I don’t think there will be a blue wave at all,” White House Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair told the Free Press earlier this month. Blair is the man tasked with overseeing the midterms for President Trump’s MAGA Inc. super-PAC.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Close up of white ballot box with American flag in the background

Close up of white ballot box with American flag in the background during US Midterm Congressional Elections 2026.

Getty Images

National Security Leaders Sound Alarm on Armed Election Deployments

With Election Day approaching, concerns continue to mount over the possibility that the Trump administration could deploy armed federal agents to election sites. Democratic leaders, the NAACP, and the American Civil Liberties Union have already raised alarms, filing lawsuits after senior administration officials repeatedly refused to rule out sending armed federal agents or immigration officers to polling places during the 2026 midterm elections.

A Warning from National Security Leaders

On September 14th, National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A)—a nonpartisan network of more than 1,600 senior national security professionals, including retired admirals, generals, senior enlisted leaders, intelligence officers, diplomats, and civilian service officials—issued an unusually direct call to action. They urged state attorneys general to prepare now to seek emergency injunctive relief if the federal government takes identifiable steps toward deploying uniformed military forces or massed armed federal law enforcement personnel into major American cities in connection with the November elections.

Keep ReadingShow less