Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

After huge progressive Michigan win, El-Sayed faces a tougher test

Opinion

After huge progressive Michigan win, El-Sayed faces a tougher test

Democratic Senate primary winner Abdul El-Sayed arrives to a press conference in front of the Spirit of Detroit statue on Aug. 5, 2026, in Detroit, Michigan. El-Sayed called on Michiganders to unite against Mike Rodgers as well as challenging him to multiple debates.

(Finn Gomez/Getty Images/TCA)

Far-left progressive Abdul El-Sayed is the Democratic nominee for Senate in Michigan, a swing state that Donald Trump won twice.

It was the first major test of an ascendant progressive wing of the Democratic Party looking to see how far they could push their agenda outside of liberal strongholds like New York City — and he passed it. But just barely, and the warning signs on the horizon are flashing red.


See, El-Sayed defeated moderate Rep. Haley Stevens by just a percentage point — winning 48.5% of the vote to her 47.5% — and thereby winning a plurality of the Democratic vote, not a majority.

That means he’s got some work to do between now and November.

He’s, as my colleague and Michigan native Jamal Simmons put it, a very talented “political athlete,” but Michigan Democrats — like all Democrats, it seems — are deeply divided on which direction to take the country, and which messages will work best to win big in November. And you better believe the general election will expose all the ugly and treacherous fault lines.

While the issue of Israel has been front-and-center — intentionally put there by many progressives who believe it a defining one, for better or worse — there are other divides in the party that candidates like El-Sayed will have to reckon with, and quickly.

One of the major schisms on the left right now is between progressives and Black voters, many of whom, especially older Black voters, aren’t supportive of the socialist agenda these candidates are openly pushing, and prefer instead moderate candidates who are focused on kitchen-table issues.

To wit, Stevens was leading among Black voters in Michigan by a whopping 46 points before the primary, and she delivered them on Tuesday night.

Of the 12 Michigan counties with large Black voter populations, El-Sayed won just five, and Stevens won seven. He also lost all of metro Detroit, the state’s largest Black-majority city, where Stevens won handily, by 60%.

El-Sayed and another far-left progressive candidate — William Lawrence, who also won his primary in Michigan’s 7th District — have earned the ire of Black leadership, with revered party elder Rep. Jim Clyburn scolding the former for not having more Black support at his rallies. Likewise, a PAC for the Congressional Black Caucus also released a statement telling their supporters not to vote for Lawrence over comments he made about Israel and Black leadership.

So, suffice it to say, El-Sayed will have to do what other progressives like Sen. Bernie Sanders could not — bring Black voters out to cast their ballots for him.

The questions, if not the answers, are clear. With Stevens out, will moderate Black voters simply stay home? Could they possibly vote for Republican Mike Rogers, who lost to moderate Dem Elissa Slotkin in 2024 by less than .3%?

Will Black leaders like Clyburn change their tune about El-Sayed now that he’s officially the nominee? If New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s race was any indication, the answer is no — Clyburn endorsed his rival, the more moderate Andrew Cuomo in that election.

Can El-Sayed and others, who had to run far to the left to engage their base in a primary, make an effective pivot to the center in time for November? Will they risk alienating their supporters if they do?

It’s a tricky road ahead for an energized and emboldened group of candidates who are about to test out messages and agendas to a much wider audience, and fend off all the scrutiny that comes with that.

Either El-Sayed will prove this new wave of progressives could be key to turning swing states blue, retaking the majority, and reinvigorating a lackluster Democratic Party, or Dems will be wishing, come November, that they stuck with the safer choice.

S.E. Cupp is the host of "S.E. Cupp Unfiltered" on CNN.


Read More

Donald Trump

Donald Trump, Oval Office, August 2026

Getty Images

The Immigration Argument Behind the SAVE America Act

In mid-July, President Trump gave a lengthy primetime address on election integrity in order to promote the "SAVE America Act." The bill would require voters to provide proof of citizenship at the ballot box, but it has drawn criticism.

However, over the speech's runtime, elections themselves are never the true subject.

Keep ReadingShow less
California State Capitol

A view of the California State Capitol in Sacramento, California.

(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Assembly Democrats Defend Independent Voters Against a Party-Driven Effort to "Undo the Top Two" Nonpartisan Primary

SACRAMENTO, Calif. A new constitutional amendment introduced in the California Assembly Monday would guarantee every voter, regardless of party preference, the right to vote in all publicly funded and administered elections. It has drawn support from a notably broad coalition of Democratic lawmakers who are putting voters first.

Simply put, this amendment—ACA 24—would codify in the California constitution that the right to vote derives from citizenship, not upon affiliation with a political party.

Keep ReadingShow less
A hand casting a vote in a ballot box for an election

A hand casting a vote in a ballot box for an election in the Kentucky, USA

Getty Images

Kentucky’s Independent Voters Are Growing. Why Are They Still Shut Out?

Kentucky’s political establishment has just been handed a number it should not be able to ignore.

In July, more Kentucky voters registered as independent or “other” than registered as Republicans and Democrats combined. More than 8,500 Kentuckians registered to vote, and the “other” category grew by 2,530 voters, compared with 2,483 new Republicans and a decline of 32 Democrats.

Keep ReadingShow less
US Supreme Court

US Supreme Court, Washington, DC

Getty Images

If You Can’t Win, Disrupt

On Monday, the Supreme Court issued a decision overturning the stay issued by Judge Talwani of the US District Court for Massachusetts. The case was brought by 23 states and the District of Columbia to enjoin Executive Order No. 14399, issued by President Trump. The Executive Order (EO) was 90 pages long and is entitled “Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections”.

The purpose of the EO according to its proponents is to (1) enhance the verification of the citizenship status of the voting public and to explicitly prohibit non-citizens from registering to vote or vote in federal elections; (2) to utilize the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Systemic Alien Verification for Entitlements program (SAVE) to assist in verifying identity and voter eligibility. (3) Establish the transmission of state citizenship lists and prioritization of investigations and prosecutions related to election fraud. (4) Require the US Postal Service (USPS) to issue new rules on mail-in and absentee ballots. (5) Have the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Commissioner of the SSA, and the Postmaster General, in coordination with the Secretary of Commerce, to effectuate all relevant aspects of the implementation of the Order. (6) Enforcement authority for this EO is vested in the Attorney General.

Keep ReadingShow less