Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Congress Bill Spotlight: Banning Dollar Coin Depicting Trump

News

A close up of American coins.

Congress debates whether Donald Trump should appear on new U.S. coins for 2026, as lawmakers introduce bills to ban living presidents from currency amid legal loopholes and political controversy.

Getty Images, Taalulla

In 1989, Donald Trump released a Monopoly-style board game featuring money depicting his own face. Now, that’s poised to imminently happen in real life.

What the legislation does


Trump is scheduled to appear on coins starting this summer, an unprecedented move in living memory. Democratic legislation in Congress would ban a sitting president or living ex-president from appearing on U.S. money.

There are currently four living ex-presidents: Joe Biden, Barack Obama, George W. Bush, and Bill Clinton. The legislation would ostensibly apply to them too, although none are currently scheduled to appear on U.S. money, as Trump is.

In the House, Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY15) introduced the TRUMP (The Restrict Ugly Money Portraits) Act last September.

In the Senate, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) introduced the similar Change Corruption Act two months later, last December. (“Change” in the bill’s title works as a double entendre, meaning both “alter” and the colloquial term for loose coins.)

Context: the news

In March, the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts – consisting entirely of Trump appointees – approved a new coin design depicting him. Trump is shown glowering with his fists on a table, based on his picture displayed at the National Portrait Gallery.

Why is there a new coin design, anyway?

In 2020, Congress enacted the Circulating Collectible Coin Redesign Act, authorizing a new dollar coin to honor the Declaration of Independence’s 250th anniversary in 2026.

However, the Congress of 2020 didn’t specify who or what this design would actually depict, instead leaving the decision up to the Treasury Department of 2026.

(The coin actually does contain some non-Trump elements more directly related to the Declaration’s anniversary, like a bald eagle and the phrase “Liberty: 1776-2026.”)

Is this legal?

Is this legal? Apparently, yes – due to a technicality dating back 160 years.

Back in 1866, a federal government official named Spencer Clark exploited a loophole to put an image of his own face on American money.

Congress enacted a law calling for a new money design to depict William Clark, of the explorer duo “Lewis and Clark.” But by referencing “Lewis and Clark,” they only implied his first name rather than saying it directly. Since the law technically only required the bill to depict someone with the last name “Clark,” Spencer Clark decided to put himself instead.

Many Americans were appalled, calling this too similar to the British monarchy from which the U.S. had broken away. (Indeed, the current monarch, King Charles III, appears on the £5, £10, £20, and £50 British banknotes.)

So Congress enacted a law banning any living person from being featured on “bonds, securities, notes, fractional or postal currency of the United States.” Essentially: bills.

But that left a loophole: a living person could still be featured on American coins.

What supporters say

The modern legislation’s supporters argue that no current or living president should appear on American money, whether it's Trump or even presidents Democrats support, like Obama.

“Like tattoos, presidents don’t always age well… regardless of anyone’s political party or viewpoint,” Rep. Torres said in a press release. “If you can’t appear on the U.S. dollar while you’re alive, you shouldn’t appear on any U.S. coins. Even North Korea doesn’t do that.”

(That’s true: the only real person currently on North Korean currency is the country’s founder, Kim Il-sung, who died in 1994.)

“President Trump’s self-celebrating maneuvers are authoritarian actions worthy of dictators, not the United States of America,” Sen. Merkley said in a separate press release. “We must reject his efforts to dismantle our ‘We The People’ republic and replace it with a strongman state.”

What opponents say

Opponents counter that Trump’s depiction is perfect for the money.

“As we approach our 250th birthday, we are thrilled to prepare coins that represent the enduring spirit of our country and democracy,” U.S. Treasurer Brandon Beach said. “And there is no profile more emblematic for the front of such coins than that of our serving President, Donald J. Trump,”

Opponents also note history is on their side: 100 years ago, in 1926, President Calvin Coolidge appeared on a coin while he was still in office. (Although it hasn’t happened since.)

What happens now?

The House version has attracted one Democratic cosponsor, Rep. Sam Liccardo (D-CA16), and was referred to the House Financial Services Committee.

The Senate version has attracted five Democratic cosponsors and was referred to the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee.

In December, nine Democratic senators wrote to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, urging him to reject a potential Trump coin design. It’s unclear why four Democrats signed onto that letter but haven’t yet cosponsored the legislation: Sens. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE), Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), Jack Reed (D-RI), and Adam Schiff (D-CA).

Jesse Rifkin is a freelance journalist with The Fulcrum. Don’t miss his report, Congress Bill Spotlight, on The Fulcrum. Rifkin’s writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.

SUGGESTIONS:

Congress Bill Spotlight: Easter Monday Act, Federal Holiday

Congress Bill Spotlight: SERVE Act, To Undo Trump Renamings

Congress Bill Spotlight: MAMDANI Act, Blocking Funds to NYC

Congress Votes With Only One House or Senate Dissenter, 2025


Read More

 Medical Vial Vaccine on Shelf Table

Peptides like BPC-157, MOTS-c and Semax are surging in popularity despite limited human evidence. Here’s why FDA regulation, research and safety matter.

skaman306/Getty Images

Millions Using Unapproved Peptides as FDA Debates Regulation

Peptides, the short chains of amino acids that help regulate biological functions, have become the latest obsession in health, fitness, and longevity.

Online clinics and wellness influencers promote them as ways to heal injuries, reduce inflammation, improve metabolism, sharpen thinking, and slow aging.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of the U.S. flag on the shape of the U.S. with blue and red figures of people across it.

Every state has its own constitution.

How State Constitutions Became the Battleground for American Rights and Liberties – on Both the Left and Right

Beyond picking governors, state legislators, local officials and representatives to serve in Congress, voters in almost every state this year will have the opportunity to amend the language of their state constitution. In one state, they could potentially rewrite the constitution altogether.

Though the U.S. Constitution is rarely amended, voters frequently amend their state constitutions. In every election cycle, voters are asked to ratify constitutional amendments.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's annual policy conference at the Washington Convention Center March 6, 2018 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

After AIPAC failed to defeat El-Sayed in the Michigan Democratic Senate primary—after spending $32 million—it said that it remains committed to defeating El-Sayed and his "radical, anti-Israel" agenda in the general election. Which means it is poised to sink tens of millions of dollars in supporting Republican Mike Rogers. It also said that Haley Stevens, his opponent, had presented "an authentic Democratic agenda." Meaning that El-Sayed did not? And they think that Mike Rogers, a MAGA Trump supporter, does compared with El-Sayed?

How can AIPAC say that El-Sayed does not present an authentic Democratic agenda when his socialist stance is much more in line with the principles stated in the Declaration of Independence than most centrist Democrats'? And making it sound like AIPAC cares about an authentic Democratic agenda is deceitful, when in the same breath they make clear that they will support Mike Rogers, a Trump lackey, in the general election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research
silhouette of person using microscope

Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research

Scientists and the federal government have been close partners since World War II. A landmark report by President Truman’s chief science advisor laid out a vision for government research that shaped eight decades of federally funded science. That vision is now at risk. In principle, the Trump administration has supported scientific research with its own vision for a new “golden age of science.” But in practice, the administration has upended the relationship between the government, researchers, and their institutions. The changes have alarmed working scientists and their allies, who have protested in record numbers.

In July, I moderated a webinar on “Rewriting the Rules: What’s happening to public science?” (read the transcript here). The webinar was co-sponsored by NAPA, CODE, and the Bridge Alliance, with Dr. Aaron Carroll of AcademyHealth, Dr. Chris Marcum of the Federation of American Scientists, Dr. Gretchen Goldman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Dr. Maryam Zaringhalam of the Center for Open Science. I also interviewed Cole Donovan of the Stand Up for Science Foundation by email.

Keep ReadingShow less