Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

For Imre Huss, Fixing Democracy Starts With Talking to a Stranger

News

two coffee cups on a table
a couple of people sitting at a table with cups of coffee

The Democracy Architects Council, presented by The Bridge Alliance Education Fund and Civics Unplugged, offers a paid, one-year fellowship for eight fellows ages 18 to 28, each selected for their work across a distinct sector of democratic life.

The youngest member of the Democracy Architects Council is building AI-powered civic tech, but he says the real work of democracy still happens face to face.


When Imre Huss talks about why he believes democracy is worth fighting for, he doesn't start with a civics textbook. He starts with his mother, who left Poland alone at 17, after helping distribute newspapers during a period of authoritarian rule there. Huss grew up in Cleveland, Ohio, hearing those stories, and he says they planted a seed: that pro-democracy organizing was something an ordinary person, even a teenager, could actually do.

That seed grew into Govvy, an AI-powered civic technology platform Huss co-founded to close the gap between residents and local government. It emerged from two experiences during his junior year of high school. The first was organizing a hyperlocal campaign (alongside neighbors in their 60s and 80s) to stop a development that threatened a green space in his city. Petitions, yard signs, and an op-ed in the local paper moved the needle some, Huss said, but what actually stopped the project was a single phone call from a retired judge in the neighborhood to a friend on the planning commission. The second was watching, as a youth advisor to his congresswoman, how constituent mail got triaged by interns before it ever reached her desk, even as her social media comments and DMs went unanswered.

"There was this intent to engage, but in practice, there weren't really the tools to do so," Huss said.

Imre Huss


Imre Huss

Govvy started out ambitious. Huss said he originally tried to design for every gap he saw across local, state and federal government before narrowing to focus on local elections and day-to-day civic information. He's headed to the University of Virginia this fall on a full scholarship through the Jefferson and Echols Scholars Program, and he's bringing Govvy's mission with him, carefully. A team will keep building it back home in Cleveland, but Huss says he won't import the platform into Charlottesville before he understands what the community actually needs.

"They [tools] should be grounded in the needs of the community, in the interests of the community," he said. "If that doesn't match the needs of the community, then I wouldn't want to bring it there."

That instinct to start local, then scale carefully, shapes how Huss thinks about a contentious debate in the democracy reform space: whether the path forward runs through local organizing or national media. He's landed on both. National media moves faster, he said, but local conversations tend to leave partisan labels at the door. He pointed to a recent trip to the Indiana Civic Summit, in a state that's grown reliably red, where he found real energy for expanding civics education, not because it polled as partisan, but because nobody had attached a party to it yet.

"If you put a D or an R next to that, at the national level, you're all supposed to agree on those things," he said. "But there is a lot of nuance within a political party."

That caution carries into how Huss talks about the council's broader mission. He argues one of the group's first jobs is repairing the word "democracy" itself, which he says has become so politically coded that it shuts down conversation before it starts. His approach: find organizations that don't see themselves as democracy groups like corporations, civic associations, sports leagues, and build buy-in one shared value at a time, without forcing a partisan frame onto it.

"We need to figure out how we connect with organizations that hold power," he said, "and then, through those connections, try to communicate a vision of democracy that is greater than just the word democracy."

It's a theory that runs through how Huss responds to a generational refrain he hears often - that young people are "the future" of democracy, tasked with fixing what older generations broke. He calls the sentiment well-intentioned but incomplete. "It's easy to say this is your responsibility as a young person," he said. "But it's very easy to say something like that without actually putting in the effort to foster those young voices and turn them into young actions."

Asked what he wants people to do - not just feel - after encountering his story, Huss didn't point to an app or a campaign. He pointed to the grocery store line.

"Talk to somebody at the grocery store. Start up a conversation. Talk to your neighbors," he said. "We try to separate ourselves, we try to become so individual, and we lose those connections we have across our society."

Kristina Becvar is the executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.


Read More

Woman sitting and typing on laptop on her lap.

AI chatbots are always guessing, even when they sound sure. Experts and Claude itself explain the AI trust gap, bias and why to check sources.

Oscar Wong/Getty Images

AI’s Information Crisis: Why Trust Is Harder to Sustain Than Ever

In all the debates about human and machine intelligence, one thing has become clear: We humans love to talk about AI. We’ve speculated whether AI will create or eliminate jobs, revolutionize or destroy science, comfort or torment us, entertain us brilliantly or rot our brains, or some combination of all these things. But amid the noise, we may have paid too little attention to a subtler impact: how AI is disrupting our relationship to information and making it harder to know what to believe.

The problem isn’t just deepfakes, the malicious manipulation of images, video, and audio. Even benign, well-intentioned AI applications can be profoundly misleading. The nature of the large language models that power chatbots means that they are always guessing, however confident they seem. How can we use AI to produce reliable information that improves public discourse rather than distorting it?

Keep ReadingShow less
Digital illustration of robot's hand holding and supporting man who is working on his desk using computer, represent themes of artificial intelligence (AI), the future of work, and the intersection of humanity and technology.

Universal basic income would cost trillions. Wage insurance, a bigger child tax credit, and a tax break for work could help workers left behind by AI at a fraction of the price.

Andriy Onufriyenko / Getty Images

AI’s Costs: The Human Element & the Response

The age of AI will be a revolutionary age. In medicine, engineering, and more, there is the possibility of great benefit to humanity. Consider some Wall Street Journal headlines: “The Quest to Use AI to Help Find New Drugs,” and “Fusion Startup Gets an AI Boost.” Already, AI is a substantial portion of GDP growth.

Yet a rising tide will not lift the boats with holes in their hulls, as Jack Kemp once said. Artificial intelligence is challenging our leaders to think about those possibly left behind. Within the AI community itself, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei expresses concern that we could see 5-10% GDP growth with 10% unemployment.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a block with the words, "AI," on it, surrounded by slightly smaller caution signs.

Efficient AI may not mean less energy. The Jevons paradox shows why demand can grow, and why no one can say yet where AI’s real limits will be.

Getty Images, J Studios

The People Selling You the Future Don’t Know It Either

Artificial Intelligence is everywhere and can no longer be avoided. Will there ever be a ceiling for the expansion of this technology? AI companies are not just selling software. The story about the inevitability that AI will have in transforming work, education, medicine, art, government, and daily life is much more profitable. People must accept the transformation or be left behind. They are selling behind a mask of certainty.

The court of public opinion on AI has concluded that this technology is too energy-consuming for the benefits it allegedly brings and the ways many people use it. Therefore, companies have shifted their agendas to presenting efficiency as a solution to the technology’s enormous need for power. Smaller, better models and chips, and more efficient data centers may reduce the energy required for a single text-based request or generated image. If those improvements make AI cheaper to use, it will be invited into more daily life right?

Keep ReadingShow less
AI chip
a computer chip with the letter a on top of it
Photo by Igor Omilaev on Unsplash

We Should Regulate AI to Make It Grow Faster

The debate over artificial intelligence has become divided between two powerful ideas: that we need a “moratorium” to slow AI until we can make it safe, and that regulating AI will slow the innovation we need for our economy and national security. Both concerns are legitimate. But “moratorium” and “slowing AI growth” are divisive terms: they reassure those concerned about AI's safety, economic and environmental consequences while alarming those who see AI competition and national security as urgent priorities. We need a different starting point—meaningful regulation that provides the safeguards necessary to protect people, communities and the environment while creating the conditions for AI to continue growing. The experiences of Europe and China challenge the assumption that regulation must slow AI.

China has combined increasingly detailed, technology-specific AI regulation with substantial government support for AI development. Recent studies provide evidence that this approach can promote innovation. One 2026 study of Chinese companies from 2017 through 2023 found that the creation of national AI innovation and development pilot zones significantly increased corporate digital transformation, in part through increased research and development, human capital and reduced transition costs. Another 2026 study, covering Chinese manufacturing companies from 2014 through 2024, found that the same policy significantly promoted the adoption of intelligent technologies.

Keep ReadingShow less