Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Border Patrol surveillance network expands across Michigan highways

News

Border Patrol surveillance network expands across Michigan highways

Surveillance camera

Canva

The U.S. Border Patrol and Department of Homeland Security have installed automated license plate reader cameras on Michigan highways as part of a nationwide surveillance network, according to reporting by MLive and the Detroit Free Press.

The cameras are part of a nationwide Border Patrol surveillance network first revealed by an Associated Press investigation and later examined in Michigan by the Detroit Free Press and MLive through a review of state records.


The systems scan and record license plates and use algorithms to flag vehicles considered suspicious.

Installation of the surveillance cameras began under the Biden administration in 2024 and was approved by Michigan state officials.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials told MLive the agency relies on a combination of personnel, technology and infrastructure to identify illegal activity and protect national security.

“As part of that approach, CBP uses license plate readers — often the same systems employed by state and local law enforcement nationwide — to help identify threats and disrupt criminal networks,” a spokesperson said in a statement to MLive.

Border Patrol’s use of license plate readers comes as the technology has become increasingly common among law enforcement agencies.

A Congressional Research Service report found all police departments serving populations of more than 1 million residents and nearly 90% of large sheriff’s offices rely on automated license plate reader technology during investigations.

According to the report, the systems can also collect information such as a vehicle’s make, color, location, and the date and time it was recorded. The technology can then compare that information against law enforcement databases and alert authorities when a vehicle matches one associated with vehicles of interest.

The Michigan Department of Transportation told MLive it does not operate the cameras or have access to the data collected. The agency said permit applications are evaluated based on highway operations and design requirements and are not approved or denied based on the agency submitting the request.

According to the Detroit Free Press, Border Patrol declined to publicly disclose the locations of the cameras, citing security concerns. However, records reviewed by the newspaper confirmed cameras had been installed in Wayne and Macomb counties.

The surveillance network has drawn increased scrutiny as immigration enforcement efforts have expanded.

In Michigan, concerns about privacy and government surveillance prompted lawmakers to introduce House Bills 5492 and 5493 earlier this year. The bipartisan legislation would regulate the use of automated license plate reader systems and establish standards for handling the data they collect. The bills have not yet been approved by the Michigan Legislature.

Immigrant rights advocates have also raised concerns about the Border Patrol surveillance network.

Christine Sauvé of the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center told MLive that many residents may not realize they are being monitored by federal immigration authorities.

“Michiganders going about their business may not realize they are being surveilled by federal immigration agents,” Sauvé said.

Sauvé also questioned the impact the technology could have on drivers who are never informed that a camera may have contributed to a traffic stop.

“Most people will likely not know the camera was the initial cause. This kind of widespread surveillance does not make our communities safer, but it does raise the serious possibility of unlawful searches and constitutional violations,” she told MLive.

Border Patrol surveillance network expands across Michigan highways was first published on Michigan Latino News and was republished with permission.

Angeles Ponpa is the Managing Editor of Latino News Network Midwest, overseeing Illinois Latino News, Wisconsin Latino News, and Michigan Latino News. She is based in Illinois.


Read More

Close up of a judge hammering a gavel

Investigations, indictments, dismissals, convictions: what each means and the questions to ask before judging claims of political weaponization of the law.

Chris Collins/Getty Images

Just the Facts: Trump, DOJ and the Legal Process

The Fulcrum approaches news stories with an open mind and skepticism, presenting our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.


The legal battles involving the Trump administration have become a constant feature of American politics and governance. Supporters often argue that many lawsuits and investigations are politically motivated attempts to block the administration's agenda. Critics contend that certain actions by the administration and the Department of Justice are themselves politically motivated or represent an improper use of government power.

Keep ReadingShow less
gavel on top of a US flag
a judge's gavel on top of a flag
Photo by Bermix Studio on Unsplash

60 Former DOJ Attorneys Oppose California Election Lawsuit

Sixty former Department of Justice attorneys from both Democratic and Republican administrations are urging a federal appeals court to reject the Justice Department's last-minute intervention in California's election. They argue that the intervention violates longstanding department policies designed to prevent election interference. The former officials cite guidelines such as Justice Manual Section 9-85.500, which advises against overt investigative or prosecutorial steps near an election, and the department's non-interference policy, which seeks to avoid actions that could affect election outcomes or integrity.

In an amicus brief filed by the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law and Complex Appellate Litigation Group LLP, the former officials argue that DOJ is taking the unusual step of seeking election-related relief just days before the midterm election, contrary to department policies that discourage such actions near Election Day. They say these policies aim to prevent election interference, discourage voter participation, or disrupt election administration. The brief cites United States v. Cohen, 152 F.3d 321 (4th Cir. 1998), where courts recognized the importance of avoiding last-minute changes to election procedures. The amici also cite Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 1 (2006), in which the Supreme Court cautioned against altering election rules close to an election, as such changes can cause confusion and undermine public confidence in the electoral process.

Keep ReadingShow less
Shadow on a wall of Judge hitting gavel in court, concept of justice, law, and legal protection

DOJ lawsuits in Alaska and California preview post-Election Day fights over certification and seating winners. Here’s how officials and voters can prepare.

Aitor Diago / Getty Images

The Lawsuits Will Lose. The Delays Will Still Win.

Less than two weeks before Election Day, President Trump’s Justice Department asked a federal court to stop Alaska from certifying its U.S. Senate race if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan loses to Democrat Mary Peltola. The lawsuit claims that a second candidate on the ballot, Daniel J. Sullivan, will confuse voters. That argument went nowhere in June, when the Alaska Supreme Court ruled that the state had no legal way to remove him from the ballot. Asked about the suit, the president took credit. “I’m the one that said do it,” he told reporters.

Alongside the Alaska suit, the Trump administration sued California to keep the state from counting mail ballots from 20,000 people it calls “likely” noncitizens. Over the summer, the Department of Homeland Security put that number at 190,000. Legal experts expect both suits to fail, as so many suits like them have. Still, Alaska and California give us an early look at what the weeks after November 3rd could bring: recount demands, calls to review or throw out ballots, and pressure to delay seating winners.

Keep ReadingShow less
Shadow on a wall of Judge hitting gavel in court, concept of justice, law, and legal protection
The Rule of Law depends on action, not blind optimism. Explore how critical hope, civic engagement, and accountability can strengthen democracy.
Aitor Diago / Getty Images

The Law Was Supposed to Be a Shield. I Found the Bars.

I used to believe that learning the law meant learning the architecture of protection.

I believed statutes existed because someone, somewhere, had anticipated injustice and decided certain lines should never be crossed. I believed due process meant power could not simply declare itself correct. I believed whistleblower protections, grievance procedures, public-records laws, administrative review and courts formed a structure designed to restrain institutional misconduct.

Keep ReadingShow less