Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Border Patrol surveillance network expands across Michigan highways

News

Border Patrol surveillance network expands across Michigan highways

Surveillance camera

Canva

The U.S. Border Patrol and Department of Homeland Security have installed automated license plate reader cameras on Michigan highways as part of a nationwide surveillance network, according to reporting by MLive and the Detroit Free Press.

The cameras are part of a nationwide Border Patrol surveillance network first revealed by an Associated Press investigation and later examined in Michigan by the Detroit Free Press and MLive through a review of state records.


The systems scan and record license plates and use algorithms to flag vehicles considered suspicious.

Installation of the surveillance cameras began under the Biden administration in 2024 and was approved by Michigan state officials.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials told MLive the agency relies on a combination of personnel, technology and infrastructure to identify illegal activity and protect national security.

“As part of that approach, CBP uses license plate readers — often the same systems employed by state and local law enforcement nationwide — to help identify threats and disrupt criminal networks,” a spokesperson said in a statement to MLive.

Border Patrol’s use of license plate readers comes as the technology has become increasingly common among law enforcement agencies.

A Congressional Research Service report found all police departments serving populations of more than 1 million residents and nearly 90% of large sheriff’s offices rely on automated license plate reader technology during investigations.

According to the report, the systems can also collect information such as a vehicle’s make, color, location, and the date and time it was recorded. The technology can then compare that information against law enforcement databases and alert authorities when a vehicle matches one associated with vehicles of interest.

The Michigan Department of Transportation told MLive it does not operate the cameras or have access to the data collected. The agency said permit applications are evaluated based on highway operations and design requirements and are not approved or denied based on the agency submitting the request.

According to the Detroit Free Press, Border Patrol declined to publicly disclose the locations of the cameras, citing security concerns. However, records reviewed by the newspaper confirmed cameras had been installed in Wayne and Macomb counties.

The surveillance network has drawn increased scrutiny as immigration enforcement efforts have expanded.

In Michigan, concerns about privacy and government surveillance prompted lawmakers to introduce House Bills 5492 and 5493 earlier this year. The bipartisan legislation would regulate the use of automated license plate reader systems and establish standards for handling the data they collect. The bills have not yet been approved by the Michigan Legislature.

Immigrant rights advocates have also raised concerns about the Border Patrol surveillance network.

Christine Sauvé of the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center told MLive that many residents may not realize they are being monitored by federal immigration authorities.

“Michiganders going about their business may not realize they are being surveilled by federal immigration agents,” Sauvé said.

Sauvé also questioned the impact the technology could have on drivers who are never informed that a camera may have contributed to a traffic stop.

“Most people will likely not know the camera was the initial cause. This kind of widespread surveillance does not make our communities safer, but it does raise the serious possibility of unlawful searches and constitutional violations,” she told MLive.

Border Patrol surveillance network expands across Michigan highways was first published on Michigan Latino News and was republished with permission.

Angeles Ponpa is the Managing Editor of Latino News Network Midwest, overseeing Illinois Latino News, Wisconsin Latino News, and Michigan Latino News. She is based in Illinois.


Read More

Citizens in Name Only: What the Supreme Court Can’t Fix
beige concrete building under blue sky during daytime

Citizens in Name Only: What the Supreme Court Can’t Fix

This month, the Supreme Court will rule on Trump v. Barbara, the case that could upend birthright citizenship as we have known it for over a century.

But the current debate over birthright citizenship overlooks the fact that legal citizenship — by birthright or naturalization — has never fully protected marginalized Americans. People of color, women, LGBTQ, and lower-income Americans have long been CINOs: Citizens in Name Only. Throughout our 250-year history, they have lacked full social citizenship - access to social/welfare entitlements, political citizenship – access to voting rights, and cultural citizenship – recognition as members of the American family. So, while a court ruling can determine who gets a U.S. birth certificate, it cannot guarantee societal inclusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
How State Courts Can Help Deflect the Supreme Court’s Latest Blow to Multiracial Democracy

Black and white illustration of voters

State Court Report

How State Courts Can Help Deflect the Supreme Court’s Latest Blow to Multiracial Democracy

With its April ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court delivered yet another blow to the Voting Rights Act, specifically Section 2, which governs race in redistricting. The decision was sad and utterly predictable, but still nothing short of astonishing. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the Court’s conservative supermajority, stealthily setting aside 40 years of legal precedent under Section 2 largely on the belief that racism is a thing of the past and extreme partisan gerrymandering is, in effect, a fundamental right of state lawmakers. Callais had a tortured path to the Court, a feature of the case that has undoubtedly been eclipsed by the lawless nature of the ruling itself, all of which reveals that the Supreme Court represents the gravest threat to multiracial democracy in the United States. (I argued as much in a law review article, predicting the outcome and analyzing the ways a Court gone rogue might get to that ruling.)

What’s more? In recent years, the Court has played fast and loose with a “principle” purportedly meant to limit chaos around elections, known as Purcell. But instead of limiting chaos, the Court’s Purcell jurisprudence will hasten and aggrandize the already-problematic impact of the Callais ruling. As the nation’s redistricting wars inevitably continue — in this election season, the 2028 presidential campaign, and even the next decade — state courts can help stave off democratic erosion by resisting the urge to invoke Purcell.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanch standing in front of a crowd.

Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche announces the indictment of former Cuban President Raúl Castro, in Miami, Fla., on May 20, 2026.

US Indictment of Raúl Castro Comes Amid a Long History of American Aggression Against Cuba

The Trump administration on May 20, 2026, indicted former Cuban President Raúl Castro for murder, based on the downing of two planes near the Cuban coastline in 1996 that killed four people.

As a historian of Latin America and U.S. foreign policy, I believe the indictment may be the prelude to direct U.S. military action against Cuba.

Keep ReadingShow less
This Sheriff’s Office Says Racial Profiling Reforms Are Too Costly. Auditors Found It Misused $163 Million.

The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office misused $163 million intended to address racial profiling reforms, according to a court-mandated audit.

Illustrations by Shoshana Gordon, ProPublica.