• Home
  • Independent Voter News
  • Quizzes
  • Election Dissection
  • Sections
  • Events
  • Directory
  • About Us
  • Glossary
  • Opinion
  • Campaign Finance
  • Redistricting
  • Civic Ed
  • Voting
  • Fact Check
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Subscriptions
  • Log in
Leveraging Our Differences
  • news & opinion
    • Big Picture
      • Civic Ed
      • Ethics
      • Leadership
      • Leveraging big ideas
      • Media
    • Business & Democracy
      • Corporate Responsibility
      • Impact Investment
      • Innovation & Incubation
      • Small Businesses
      • Stakeholder Capitalism
    • Elections
      • Campaign Finance
      • Independent Voter News
      • Redistricting
      • Voting
    • Government
      • Balance of Power
      • Budgeting
      • Congress
      • Judicial
      • Local
      • State
      • White House
    • Justice
      • Accountability
      • Anti-corruption
      • Budget equity
    • Columns
      • Beyond Right and Left
      • Civic Soul
      • Congress at a Crossroads
      • Cross-Partisan Visions
      • Democracy Pie
      • Our Freedom
  • Pop Culture
      • American Heroes
      • Ask Joe
      • Celebrity News
      • Comedy
      • Dance, Theatre & Film
      • Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging
      • Faithful & Mindful Living
      • Music, Poetry & Arts
      • Sports
      • Technology
      • Your Take
      • American Heroes
      • Ask Joe
      • Celebrity News
      • Comedy
      • Dance, Theatre & Film
      • Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging
      • Faithful & Mindful Living
      • Music, Poetry & Arts
      • Sports
      • Technology
      • Your Take
  • events
  • About
      • Mission
      • Advisory Board
      • Staff
      • Contact Us
Sign Up
  1. Home>
  2. Voting>
  3. vote by mail>

Vote-by-mail benefits neither party and is nearly fraud-free, new studies find

Our Staff
April 16, 2020
Vote by mail ballot
Bill Oxford/Getty Images

Voting by mail does not help Democrats more than Republicans and does not incubate fraud — but does generate a bit more turnout, a pair of academic studies out Thursday conclude.

The twin reports, one from Stanford and the other from the Union of Concerned Scientists, come as the debate about making elections more flexible in the face of the coronavirus has become increasingly partisan.


Although voting in person, the method used by three-quarters of Americans before this year, currently poses serious health risks to both voters and poll workers, President Trump is opposing efforts to broadly expand absentee balloting by November. He says the GOP will suffer and that a wave of widespread cheating will be the major reason.

There's no evidence of such partisan advantage in the detailed results from the past dozen elections in California, Utah and Washington. They were analyzed by the Democracy and Polarization Lab at Stanford, which chose the states because each steadily expanded voting by mail, county by county, in the last two decades so that it is now nearly universally used.

The data showed "a truly negligible effect" on partisan turnout rates when comparing the counties with and without the system, the researchers said. The effect on partisan vote share was similarly indistinguishable from zero. But the switch did boost turnout modestly across the board in each state, by 1.9 to 2.4 percentage points.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The data includes every election from 1996 to 2018, so the results could not be more current.

The effort to debunk the view that mail balloting fuels election fraud was conducted by the Union of Concerned Scientists with researchers at UCLA and the University of New Mexico. "Voter fraud in U.S. elections continues to be extremely low, and people should not be forced to put their health at risk to exercise their right to vote," their report concluded.

The report was based on an exhaustive aggregation of government and nonprofit group studies about election crime going back four decades. It made extensive use of a database of cases between 1982 and this spring assembled by the Heritage Foundation, the premier conservative think tank. It has found just 207 fraudulent absentee ballot cases out of 1,277 instances of credible voter fraud — or 16 percent of the total.

The social scientists noted that in Oregon, the first of five states to institute a system where every voter is proactively sent a mail-in ballot for every primary and general election, more than 2 million votes were cast in the 2016 presidential election — and after investigating 56 cases of possible fraud, the state concluded just 10 ballots were cast in violation of state criminal law.

From Your Site Articles
  • Myth-busting the top 10 objections to 'vote at home' systems - The ... ›
  • Vote-by-mail group issues guidance for states - The Fulcrum ›
  • Conservative anti-Trumpers launch vote-by-mail ad campaign - The Fulcrum ›
  • Jimmy Carter, in reversal, embraces vote by mail - The Fulcrum ›
  • Eight myths that could destroy the election - The Fulcrum ›
  • GOP sues to stop Calif. from mailing ballots to all voters - The Fulcrum ›
  • VoteSafe launches to push multiple voting options - The Fulcrum ›
  • Bogus claims cloud real obstacles to expanded mail voting - The Fulcrum ›
  • How to get by mental hangups related to voting by mail - The Fulcrum ›
  • Trump’s latest baseless claim about mail voting sows doubts that could help him - The Fulcrum ›
  • GOP support for mail voting is growing, despite Trump - The Fulcrum ›
  • Republican Rep. Steve Watkins charged with election fraud - The Fulcrum ›
  • No extension for mail ballots in battleground Michigan - The Fulcrum ›
  • Fact checking Trump's vote-by mail claims - The Fulcrum ›
  • Fact checking claims that ballots can go to wrong address - The Fulcrum ›
  • Worker shortage has MD officials seeking to cut voting sites - The Fulcrum ›
  • N.J., Ky expand mail voting access, Ind. does not - The Fulcrum ›
  • USPS gets more blame than it deserves for ballot woes - The Fulcrum ›
  • Nebraska will send mail-in-vote applications to everyone - The Fulcrum ›
  • 16 states can get a head start on counting mailed-in ballots - The Fulcrum ›
  • Election experts press media for election night transparency - The Fulcrum ›
  • An all-by-mail election is unwise — and unnecessary - The Fulcrum ›
  • Jimmy Carter, in reversal, embraces vote by mail - The Fulcrum ›
  • Webinar rewind: How to make voting healthier and easier - The Fulcrum ›
  • Public solidly supports voting by mail in November - The Fulcrum ›
  • North Carolina, Arkansas, Georgia consider election changes - The Fulcrum ›
  • Trump's allies push small instances of suspected vote fraud - The Fulcrum ›
  • Fact-checking Trump's debate claims about voter fraud - The Fulcrum ›
  • Vote-by-mail deadlines to know - The Fulcrum ›
  • Justice Dept. investigations may disrupt election - The Fulcrum ›
  • Vote Smarter 2020: Difference in voting by mail and voting absentee - The Fulcrum ›
  • Report: Restricting vote by mail won't combat fraud - The Fulcrum ›
  • Vote at Home Institute sees state and federal opportunities - The Fulcrum ›
Related Articles Around the Web
  • Why vote-by-mail may not save our elections from the virus' disruption ›
  • All-Mail Elections (aka Vote-By-Mail) ›
vote by mail
Get some Leverage Sign up for The Fulcrum Newsletter
Follow
Contributors

Independent voters want to be heard. Is anybody listening?

David Thornburgh
John Opdycke

The U.S. has been seeking the center since the days of Teddy Roosevelt

Dave Anderson

Imperfection and perseverance

Jeff Clements

We’ve expanded the Supreme Court before. It’s time to do so again.

Anushka Sarkar

The ‘great replacement theory’ is nonsense

Debilyn Molineaux

Inflation will hit health of low-income Americans hardest

Robert Pearl
latest News

Nearly 20 states have restricted private funding of elections

David Meyers
5h

Video: Will Trump run in 2024?

Our Staff
10h

The state of voting: May 23, 2022

Our Staff
23 May

Trump looms large over Tuesday’s primaries

Richard Perrins
23 May

Podcast: Abortion politics take center stage

Our Staff
23 May

Your Take: Inspiring sports memories

Our Staff
20 May
Videos

Video: Helping loved ones divided by politics

Our Staff

Video: What happened in Virginia?

Our Staff

Video: Infrastructure past, present, and future

Our Staff

Video: Beyond the headlines SCOTUS 2021 - 2022

Our Staff

Video: Should we even have a debt limit

Our Staff

Video: #ListenFirstFriday Yap Politics

Our Staff
Podcasts

Podcast: Did economists move the Democrats to the right?

Our Staff
02 May

Podcast: The future of depolarization

Our Staff
11 February

Podcast: Sore losers are bad for democracy

Our Staff
20 January

Deconstructed Podcast from IVN

Our Staff
08 November 2021
Recommended
Independent voters want to be heard. Is anybody listening?

Independent voters want to be heard. Is anybody listening?

Voting
Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg

Nearly 20 states have restricted private funding of elections

State
Video: Will Trump run in 2024?

Video: Will Trump run in 2024?

Elections
State of voting - election law changes

The state of voting: May 23, 2022

Voting
Mo Brooks and Donald Trump

Trump looms large over Tuesday’s primaries

Voting
Podcast: Abortion politics take center stage

Podcast: Abortion politics take center stage

Leadership