Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Ask Joe: Roe v. Wade

Ask Joe: Roe v. Wade

Hi Joe,

I am devastated by the Supreme Court ruling on Roe v. Wade. I believe a woman should be able to make her own choices concerning her health. But my problem is that I also think there should be restrictions on abortions. I’m afraid to mention this to any of my friends or family. I tried bringing this up with a friend recently and she bit off my head. I don’t know what to do. I feel stuck.

Alone


Hello, Alone.

I’m sorry you are feeling this way. Everyone should be able to express their beliefs without it being taken as an attack. Especially amongst friends. That doesn’t mean that everyone needs to agree with you, but people who respect and care about each other should be open to at least hear you and find out more about where you are coming from.

The problem, of course, comes from our hyper-polarized time where there is no longer any subtlety for variations on viewpoints and beliefs. As the tension builds, we have sacrificed respectful, creative, nuanced dialogue for stubborn, reactive stances, reducing almost all important issues to a choice of This or That. We find ourselves in positions of “You’re either for us, or you’re against us.”

Increasingly, we equate our beliefs with our identity, so any differing views are perceived as an existential threat. We have forgotten that we have viewpoints and beliefs; not that we are our viewpoints and beliefs. Our viewpoints and beliefs are not fixed and unchanging, but rather transform over time. In a healthy social and civic system, our viewpoints and beliefs shift, grow and evolve as a way to adapt to our ever-changing world and our experiences.

I would say that it is possible to advocate for women having agency over their own bodies, and also be concerned about the possible outcome of a fetus. Not either/or, but instead both/and. Imagine if more people were able to have that discussion! I’m sure that there are many people who support women in making their own choices about their bodies and health who can also hold the notion of different outcomes of a fetus. In what has been an often divided conversation, there are people working to ensure women’s rights who can also support limits on abortions.

Imagine if these people engaged in productive dialogue and approached each other with civility and fierceness, curiosity and compassion. Solutions could emerge that would both reduce unplanned pregnancies and the number of abortions in the United States while still ensuring women’s health and autonomy.

There are two important steps that would need to happen. The first is for all of us to let go of the false idea that simply creating a law or policy makes people stop doing what they were already doing. The second is to look beyond the single issue of abortion and understand the larger issues relating to it. The process of collaboration and bringing in diverse voices from all sides is messy. But it plants the seeds for new solutions that will get buy-in from all involved and potentially lead to a lasting transformation of viewpoints, habits and patterns.

I’m not sure if any of this is comforting. The potential is that it can give you the confidence to be part of a better solution. And perhaps offer you some hope that you’re not alone when it comes to this complex and deeply personal issue. Perhaps you can find others who are open to discussion. If you choose to have those conversations, make sure to set up some guidelines and boundaries to ensure a sense of safety for all. You may be surprised at what people share if they are invited into a conversation that is respectful, heart-centered and creative.

Try your best to stay engaged,

Joe

Joe is an advice columnist, conflict resolution specialist, trainer, coach, advocate for lasting peace, and founder of the Fierce Civility Project. Ask Joe is dedicated to exploring the best ways to transform tensions and bridge divides. Our resident advice columnist and conflict resolution specialist, Joe Weston, is here to answer your questions in order to resolve tension, polarization, or conflict.

To Ask Joe, please submit questions to: AskJoe@Fulcrum.us.


Read More

Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Show Rekindles America’s Cultural Divide

Bad Bunny performs onstage during the Apple Music Super Bowl LX Halftime Show at Levi's Stadium on February 08, 2026 in Santa Clara, California.

(Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)

Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Show Rekindles America’s Cultural Divide

As a child of the 60s and 70s, music shaped my understanding of the world as it does for so many young people stepping into adulthood today. Watching Bad Bunny stand alone at midfield during the Super Bowl, hearing the roar as his first notes hit, and then witnessing the backlash the next day, I felt something familiar to the time of my youth. The styles have changed, but the cultural divide between young and old, between left and right, around music remains the same. The rancor about who gets to speak, who gets to belong, and whose voices are considered “American” remains remarkably constant.

The parallels to the 1980s are striking. President Ronald Reagan, in a 1983 speech lamenting what he saw as the “decay of values” among my generation, warned that “there are those who portray America as a land of racism, violence, and despair. That is not the America we know.” In his radio commentaries, he went further, arguing that “some of the so‑called protest songs seem more intent on tearing down America than lifting it up.” Fast‑forward to today, and the pattern repeats itself. Before the Super Bowl even began, President Trump announced he would boycott the game and blasted the NFL’s choice of performers as “a terrible choice,” setting the tone for the wave of outrage that followed Bad Bunny’s appearance.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny: Bridging Cultural Divides Through Song and Dance

Bad Bunny-inspired coquito-flavored lattes.

Photo provided by Latino News Network

Bad Bunny: Bridging Cultural Divides Through Song and Dance

Exactly one week before his Apple Music Super Bowl LX Halftime Show performance, Bad Bunny made history at the 68th Grammy Awards after his latest studio album, DeBÍ TiRAR MáS FOTos, became the first Spanish-language project to win Album of the Year in Grammy history. Despite facing heavy criticisms that expose existing socio-cultural tensions in the U.S., Bad Bunny, born Benito Ocasio, will continue to make history as the first Spanish-language solo headliner at the Halftime Show, bridging sociocultural divides in the most Boricua way: through song and dance.

The NFL’s announcement of this year’s Super Bowl headliner in late September drew significant criticism, particularly from American audiences.

Keep ReadingShow less
Word Kill: Politics Can Be Murder on Poetry

A poster featuring Renee Good sits along the street near a memorial to Good on January 16, 2026 in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

(Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Word Kill: Politics Can Be Murder on Poetry

Across the United States and the world, millions are still processing the recent killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis by ICE agents. Reactions have intensified as more recently ICE agents shot a Venezuelan man in the same city, and additional National Guard troops have been deployed there.

Many were shocked learning of Good’s shooting, and the shock grew as more information and details about the events leading up to her death, as well as facts about Good herself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny Super Bowl Clash Deepens America’s Cultural Divide

Bad Bunny performs on stage during the Debí Tirar Más Fotos world tour at Estadio GNP Seguros on December 11, 2025 in Mexico City, Mexico.

(Photo by Emma McIntyre/Getty Images)

Bad Bunny Super Bowl Clash Deepens America’s Cultural Divide

On Monday, January 26th, I published a column in the Fulcrum called Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Halftime Show Sparks National Controversy As Trump Announces Boycott. At the time, I believed I had covered the entire political and cultural storm around Bad Bunny’s upcoming Super Bowl performance.

I was mistaken. In the days since, the reaction has only grown stronger, and something deeper has become clear. This is no longer just a debate about a halftime show. It is turning into a question of who belongs in America’s cultural imagination.

Keep ReadingShow less