Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Leaders Are Stepping Away. Here’s What We Can Do About It.

Opinion

Leaders Are Stepping Away. Here’s What We Can Do About It.
white concrete building under clear blue sky

From statehouses to Capitol Hill, public servants are stepping away from elected office. In Congress, retirement announcements are at their second-highest level in a century.

Why is this happening? Some leaders are worried about political violence. Others are frustrated by how difficult it has become to get things done. Many are simply burned out.


I remember a time when fierce policy disagreements could still end with a handshake. When public service, however imperfect, was anchored by a shared sense of purpose. Watching that culture erode has been painful, both for those in office and for the people they serve.

At LEE, we’ve been asking what needs to change. We know most leaders do not leave office because they stop caring. They leave because they feel overwhelmed, frustrated, and unsupported. Too often, they lack the tools, support, and community needed to remain in public service.

That’s why we’ve invested more intentionally to help leaders grow and stay in office.

Building on our Courageous Leadership Conference, last year we launched American Roundtable: an invitation-only convening for a select group of LEE elected officials serving in politically mixed, often difficult environments. We brought together state legislators, city council members, and other local leaders from across the country for a three-day gathering designed to offer what the political system rarely does: space to step away from the noise, reflect, learn, and engage seriously across lines of difference.

This intentional design mattered. Members told us the restorative environment helped them slow down enough to think more clearly, listen more openly, and reconnect with why they entered public service in the first place. The conversations were guided by people like John Deasy, Shaka Mitchell, and me, who brought policy depth, governing experience, and a real understanding of what it takes to lead when trust is thin and the stakes are high.

If we want leaders to solve hard problems in their communities and move beyond reflexive partisanship, we have to create spaces that help them practice a different way of leading. The American Roundtable is one step in that direction.

What our leaders need

We often talk about leadership as if it’s something that just happens. But the truth is that it takes practice.

This is even harder to do given the enormous strain folks are under. Members of Congress face relentless fundraising pressure and often the burden of maintaining two homes to do their jobs effectively. State and local officials are often balancing public service with full-time jobs, family responsibilities, and modest or inconsistent pay. In 2024, state legislator salaries ranged from just $100 to $142,000, with an average of $44,320. Over time, those realities make public service harder to sustain and can quietly shut out people who otherwise might run and lead.

These are the people making decisions about our schools, our safety, and our communities. Yet too often, we do not give them the leadership training, support structures, or breathing room they need to do the work well.

As one participant shared, “We’re not investing enough early in people’s political careers — in their orientation, their mindset, and their ability to work across lines of difference.” That’s exactly why we created the American Roundtable.

What we learned together

During our time together, a few reflections became clear.

First, effectively understanding and navigating differences takes time. Leadership is not about who can dominate a room. It is about who can listen long enough to understand what is really at stake for someone else.

Second, people are more nuanced than the stories we tell about them. We all carry assumptions about one another until we sit across the table from one another and have deep, direct conversations.

Third, values live in tension. Leadership often means navigating competing priorities, knowing when to hold firm, when to compromise, and how to move with integrity through complexity.

Fourth, leaders need community. No one can do this work alone. We all need trusted spaces where we can be candid, challenged, and supported, and relationships that force us to question our assumptions and grow.

Finally, today’s political climate too often pushes people toward anger and division. The harder work is choosing empathy and curiosity over outrage.

Where we go from here

If we want a different kind of politics, we have to invest in a different kind of leadership.

The American Roundtable can be a model for a different kind of leadership development: one that gives leaders the space, tools, and relationships to grow.

If you are a leader in the office and feeling the weight of this moment, do not carry it alone. Reach out. Find your roundtable, whether through LEE or in your own community.

And if you care about the future of public service, support leaders who choose nuance over noise. Demand systems that reflect the value we say this work holds.

Real change still happens when people are willing to sit together, listen, and do the hard work of understanding one another.

That’s where it begins, with us.

Mildred Otero serves as the President of LEE.

Read More

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

United States Marine Corps Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II STOVL stealth multirole fighters belonging to the VMFA-121 "Green Knights" taxiing at the MCAS Iwakuni in Yamaguchi, Japan, on March 23, 2017.

(viper-zero / Getty Images)

How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

In earlier essays, I argued that America’s political division has grown so deep that a peaceful “American Union” of two sovereign nations — one broadly red, one broadly blue — is worth considering. I also argued that relocation fears are overstated, that cooperation could increase economic prosperity, and that separation could help heal the lingering wounds of the Civil War.

But how would this all actually work? What happens to the national debt? Who gets the military bases, federal lands, and nuclear weapons? Will Social Security be protected? Could two nations share the dollar, defend themselves together, and resolve their disagreements?

Keep ReadingShow less
Rear view of teenage boy walking with arm around friends

Why many young men feel politically and socially adrift, how changing gender roles affect masculinity, self-esteem, relationships, and the future of society.

Maskot / Getty Images

Lost Boys - What Is the Role of a Man in Today's Society?

A recent New York Times article stated that young males who provided an important swing vote for Trump in 2024 are discouraged by what Trump has done and not done while in office. But they are nevertheless not particularly inclined to vote Democratic because they don't see the Party as welcoming their view of masculinity and they don't know where they fit in this society.

These young men assume that because the Party supports equality for women in the workplace and because many young women no longer have marriage and having children at the top of their agenda, the Party would not be a welcoming home for them. They see themselves as striving for the masculinity of their fathers' or grandfathers' day, where the man was the breadwinner in the family and had respect and authority. Not the weaker half in relationships with women.

Keep ReadingShow less
Showing Up and Staying: Disaster Relief in an Age of Distrust

NECHAMA volunteers in Western North Carolina after Hurricane Helene.

Showing Up and Staying: Disaster Relief in an Age of Distrust

As the Atlantic hurricane season officially began on June 1, disaster response organizations across the country are preparing for the next storm. That preparation includes coordinating logistics, purchasing supplies, training volunteers, and strengthening partnerships. It now also requires planning for an environment shaped by misinformation, distrust, and competing narratives.

A recent 60 Minutes segment examining extremist groups in disaster zones highlighted how quickly public perceptions can form after a disaster. Recovery efforts are now followed by outside groups and online networks attempting to influence how events are understood while communities are still in crisis.

Keep ReadingShow less