Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Who Is Electable? Michigan’s Senate Primary Asks a Familiar Question.

No one can agree on what, exactly, electability is — but both Haley Stevens and Abdul El-Sayed are making the case that they have it.

Opinion

A crowd of supporters holding signs behind Senate candidate Dr. Abdul El-Sayed as he stands and speaks at a podium outside in front of a crowd.

The crowd cheers as Senate candidate Dr. Abdul El-Sayed speaks during the "People vs. the Powerful" rally in Lansing, Michigan, on July 19, 2026.

Rosem Morton for The 19th

DETROIT — Rep. Jim Clyburn of South Carolina, a top Black House Democrat, was making the case for a moderate politician running on boosting jobs and manufacturing. Six years ago, it was to crowds in his home state, arguing that Joe Biden was the best positioned to win in a general election. This time, it was on a stage in Detroit, for a candidate in one of 2026’s most hotly contested Senate primaries.

“I know what it takes to energize Democratic voters. I know she has what it takes to energize Democratic voters, and we need that,” Clyburn said alongside Rep. Haley Stevens, a candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan, at a Teamsters hall in Detroit on Friday before the two rallied alongside Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.


Stevens, a moderate House lawmaker elected to a House district in the Detroit suburbs in 2018, is running against Abdul El-Sayed, a former public health official and progressive backed by Sen. Bernie Sanders. The Tuesday primary for the seat held by retiring Democratic Sen. Gary Peters is critical to Democrats’ long-shot hopes of taking back the Senate.

Clyburn argued that Stevens would defeat likely Republican nominee former Rep. Mike Rogers by more votes, and so nominating her was necessary to thwart potential meddling in the midterms by President Donald Trump, who attempted to overturn his 2020 election loss in the state.

“With what’s going on in this country, we have got to make sure that this Democratic turnout in November is too big for Trump to rig,” he told reporters. “That’s what’s at stake here.”

Both sides expect a close race, though an independent poll from Emerson College released Thursday showed El-Sayed leading Stevens by 15 points, 54 to 39 percent. The race between Stevens and El-Sayed has largely been framed as a battle between the centrist and progressive wings of the party and as a major test for pro-Israel groups like AIPAC, whose more than $30 million in outside spending in favor of Stevens has become central to El-Sayed’s case against her.

Senate candidate Haley Stevens speaks into a microphone onstage as supporters behind her hold orange and blue campaign signs.Rep. Haley Stevens speaks at the Michigan Democratic Party Endorsement Convention in Detroit, Michigan on April 19, 2026. (Andrew Roth/SIPA/AP)

The race is all of those things, but it’s also the latest iteration of Democrats’ debate about what makes a candidate electable — a quality Democrats prioritize even as no one can agree on what, exactly, electability is, and many argue it discounts candidates who aren’t White men. Both sides have also accused the other of making identity-based critiques.

The elusive idea of electability has shaped each of the past three presidential elections: After Hillary Clinton, the first woman major party presidential nominee, lost to President Donald Trump in 2016, Democrats nominated Biden as the safest bet to beat Trump. And then after Biden’s public implosion in a June 2024 presidential debate, former Vice President Kamala Harris navigated the double standards and expectations of being the first Black woman and South Asian major party nominee during her truncated and ultimately unsuccessful campaign.

The result in Michigan has major implications for the electability conversation in the wide-open 2028 Democratic presidential primary, in which Michigan is set to play a starring role as one of the first six states to vote in the Democratic primary and as a critical battleground state in the general election.

“The urgency to beat Trump, I think, really hypercharged this back in 2019 and 2020,” Tré Easton, vice president at the Searchlight Institute, a Democratic think tank, said in an interview earlier this month. “I think because that urgency will be lessened, that there’ll be some breathing room to actually interact, engage and interrogate: ‘What do we actually stand for as a party, what are our values, and who do we trust to actually be our standard bearer?’ in what’s going to be, I think, a change election.”

Both Stevens and El-Sayed are framing themselves as Davids vs. Goliaths, going up against broader outside forces working against them and counting them out. In Stevens’ case, it’s the online critics she dubs the “cool kids on the internet” and “coastal elites,” a term most often deployed by Republicans, who are mocking her Michigan accent and discounting her appeal. El-Sayed has framed himself as an insurgent underdog going up against not just Stevens, but AIPAC and the other corporate interests.

El-Sayed, who would be the first-ever Muslim U.S. senator, is self-deprecating on the campaign trail, joking he has a name “tailor-made” for politics that has “sounds coming out of parts of people’s throats they don’t know they have.”

But he was serious when he took on the question of electability at an intimate meet-and-greet with voters hosted at the house of a supporter in Davison, a suburb of Flint. He invoked W.E.B DuBois’ idea of the double consciousness. He recalled a man in a rural and deep-red area who didn’t like him because he was Muslim, but was voting for him because he was running on universal health care. And he argued that dismissing him as unelectable is an insult to the voters of Michigan.

“When most people say I’m not electable, what they’re pointing at is my name and my faith in a state that elected Barack Obama twice,” El-Sayed later told The 19th in an interview.

“Turns out, electable candidates actually have to build movements, and the fact that she has not and is making up for it with the $60 million in character attacks that AIPAC is driving into our politics says a lot about who’s more electable in a general election,” he added.

A woman and two children hold Abdul El-Sayed campaign signs inside a rally venue; the woman raises one sign overhead while smiling.Cecelia Terraza, 36, and her children, Maya, 3, and Rio, 5, hold signs during a rally for Dr. Abdul El-Sayed in Lansing Center, Michigan on July 19, 2026. (Rosem Morton for The 19th)

Stevens is arguing that nominating El-Sayed would be too risky due to his stances and because of recently leaked audio of Rogers saying he thought he’d be “in good shape” if El-Sayed were the nominee. She’s also argued that El-Sayed hasn’t been transparent enough about his personal finances; he released a financial disclosure on Monday.

“We need to ask him: what else is he hiding?” she said in the debate. “What will Republicans uncover in the general election that they will use against him?”

El-Sayed, by contrast, says the outside spending is “a crutch” that undercuts Stevens’ electability claim.

“I’d be happy to have no outside spending at all on my behalf if it meant that $60 million wasn’t spent against me,” he said in the spin room following the debate. “What would this race be? And then you have the audacity to say you’re electable? Let’s get serious.”

The Senate primary has turned increasingly contentious in the final stretch, with online feuds between the two candidates’ camps spilling out into real life. It’s also taken on explicitly gendered and racial overtones even as many Democrats have largely turned away from explicit appeals to identity politics in the wake of the party’s 2024 election loss.

The AIPAC-affiliated super PAC United Democracy Project, which has spent over $30 million backing Stevens, has aired ads and sent out mailers asserting El-Sayed has “a pattern of disrespecting women,” a claim El-Sayed disputes and that fact-checks from local outlets have found is misleading and takes his past statements out of context.

“I’ve worked in public health where all of my coworkers, all of the deputies I’ve ever had in public health were women, and if there was a history of that, you would have heard about it,” he told The 19th.

Voters supporting El-Sayed also saw the AIPAC-funded ads as unconvincing. Dana Creighton, a 53-year-old graduate student in gender studies from Manchester who attended an El-Sayed rally and canvass launch in the Detroit suburb of Ferndale on Saturday, described the environment as a “a shitshow” and El-Sayed as “more of a feminist than Haley Stevens.”

“I missed the part where critiquing a woman’s policies is sexist,” she said. “He criticized a political decision.”

El-Sayed has also faced attacks based on his faith and ethnicity. At the Stevens event Friday, Farmington school board member Angie Smith sparked a firestorm when she told local reporter Sam Robinson that El-Sayed’s campaign was alienating other groups by “speaking Arabic” and putting “Arabic music” on. Stevens’ campaign denounced her remarks, and Smith later apologized.

“They always use this word around me: ‘dangerous,’” El-Sayed told the crowd in Ferndale. “I always wonder, why would you call someone like me dangerous? It’s not like people who look like me have ever been called dangerous. It’s not like you’re falling into a well-worn groove that’s been around for 25 years, calling people who look like me with names like mine dangerous.”

Stevens and her supporters have also charged his other criticisms of her as being gendered.

“It was offensive to hear my opponent say I can’t string together two sentences,” Stevens told reporters on Friday, referring to comments El-Sayed made in an interview with Semafor earlier this month. “I certainly did that on the auto rescue. I certainly have been doing that as I’ve been standing up to Trump’s abuses of power and our energy company that’s just raising rates right now.”

Stevens, who served as chief of staff on the federal rescue of the U.S. auto industry following the 2008 financial crisis before being elected to a seat in the Detroit suburbs in 2018, is a policy wonk and self-described “manufacturing geek” running a campaign hyper-focused not on national celebrity, she says, but on Michigan.

Haley Stevens, wearing safety glasses and a reflective vest, speaks with workers on a factory floor as other employees stand nearby.Rep. Haley Stevens talks to women working on the line as she tours the Webasto Plymouth Plant on May 1, 2026 in Plymouth, Michigan. (Sarah Rice/Getty Images)

Speaking to reporters before the first of two visits to Black church services Sunday, Stevens lit up with excitement as she told a reporter from The Economist about her 100-page-long legislation aiming to lessen U.S. dependence on critical minerals from China.

And when The 19th asked her what she thought the “cool kids on the internet” and “coastal elites” were missing about the race, Stevens said Michigan is a “unique” state as one of the few in the nation whose economy is reliant on domestic manufacturing, making its voters especially sensitive to high energy prices and tariffs.

“Nobody here in Detroit and throughout Michigan is making fun of the way I sound,” she added. “They are telling me that their bills are too darn high, that they deserve better, particularly in the halls of power, that we need to be understood.”

Stevens’ supporters, including some of the Black local elected officials who have endorsed her, see her as the most electable choice to beat Rogers.

“I’m a centrist Democrat. I’m a moderate Democrat, and I’m proud of that fact,” Detroit Council Member Scott Benson told reporters outside Plymouth United Church of Christ on Sunday. “That’s what we need to be competitive in the state of Michigan. Those views, [El-Sayed’s] views, they are very well-accepted in other places, but when we have a purple state, I’m not sure that’s going to play well here.”

Matt Grossman, head of the Institute for Public Policy and Social Research at Michigan State University, said that argument isn’t completely unfounded.

“There is a long-standing, small but real benefit for more moderate candidates in general elections — everybody believes that about the other party but not about their own party,” he said. “There is also a benefit for previously elected politicians.”

Michigan has a long history of electing pragmatic, results-focused Democratic women in the mold of Whitmer, who defeated El-Sayed in the 2018 Democratic primary for governor; former Sen. Debbie Stabenow; Rep. Debbie Dingell; and former Rep. Barbara Lawrence, whom Stevens counts as one of her mentors.

From left, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Abdul El-Sayed and Sen. Bernie Sanders raise their joined hands onstage as supporters cheer behind them.The crowd cheers as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Senate candidate Dr. Abdul El-Sayed and Sen. Bernie Sanders raise their hands during the “People vs. the Powerful” rally at the Lansing Center in Lansing, Michigan, on July 19, 2026. (Rosem Morton for The 19th)

But the broader trends benefiting more moderate candidates, Grossman noted, don’t necessarily apply in every single election.

And this year’s Senate contest comes amid widespread discontent and anger among the Democratic base with its leadership, heightened skepticism toward the role of corporate money in politics, opposition to data centers and souring sentiment toward Israel after its yearslong war in Gaza — all factors that have powered El-Sayed.

El-Sayed’s run is the first big test of whether the ascendant left can win statewide in a battleground state.

And national progressives see it as critical in an existential fight against AIPAC and corporate influence, with major progressive figures like Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Chris Van Hollen of Maryland hitting the campaign trail with El-Sayed. In interviews in Davison, Warren and Van Hollen said they saw the race as much bigger than a contest between El-Sayed and Stevens.

“I’ve known Abdul for a long time, but the key here is the scam in all of it. This outside spending is fundamentally dishonest,” Warren told The 19th of the outside groups opposing him.

“The outfits that are putting millions and millions of dollars into this race want to own a senator, and they know they can’t own Abdul, so they’re throwing everything they’ve got into blocking him.”


Who Is Electable? Michigan’s Senate Primary Asks a Familiar Question. was originally published by The 19th and is republished with permission.


Read More

Voter receives a pen from poll worker at polling station.

A civic petition calling for constitutional restraint, civil discourse, bipartisan cooperation, and equal justice to strengthen American democracy and national unity.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

A Contemporary Olive Branch Petition

To the President of the United States, the Leaders of the Congress, and Our Fellow Americans Entrusted with the Powers of Government:

When, in the ordinary course of a free republic, disagreements arise among citizens concerning the proper exercise of power, it is neither unusual nor dishonorable that earnest convictions should differ. Such diversity has long been the strength of our nation, for liberty has never depended upon unanimity of opinion, but upon mutual respect under a common Constitution.

Keep Reading Show less
Close-up shot of a Black woman's hands receiving a mail-in ballot to vote in a USA Presidential, Senatorial, Congressional, or local election

Federal investigators spent eight months reviewing the Allied Pilots Association election, examining ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and transparency before allowing the results to stand.

Jeremy Poland/Getty Images

What a Federal Investigation of a Union Election Can Teach Us About Democratic Trust

For eight months, federal investigators examined allegations involving ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and reporting procedures in a contested union election before allowing the result to stand.

Following a disputed election within the Allied Pilots Association (APA), complaints led to a formal review by the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Labor-Management Standards. Investigators spent months going through election records, audit logs, witness testimony and technical documentation before reaching their conclusion.

Keep Reading Show less
50501 Movement – Thomas Paine’s Political Philosophy in the 21st Century

circa 1770: The English-born American revolutionary philosopher Thomas Paine, (1737 - 1809), who wrote and published 'The Rights of Man', (1791 - 1792), in England. In it he expressed his support for the French Revolution and called for the overthrow of the British monarchy.

(Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

50501 Movement – Thomas Paine’s Political Philosophy in the 21st Century

The 50501 Movement can be viewed as a 21st-century manifestation of the anti-authoritarian, pro-egalitarian framework that Thomas Paine championed in Common Sense. Both movements share a core belief in challenging entrenched power and mobilizing the collective voice of everyday people to defend democracy. By utilizing decentralized, nationwide grassroots mobilization to challenge executive overreach and billionaire consolidation, the 50501 movement directly echoes Paine’s anti-authoritarianism, his belief in collective civic power, and his demand that power remains in the hands of the people.

The 50501 Movement mirrors the spirit of Paine’s Common Sense through three primary parallels:

Keep Reading Show less
  Creative Images & Video Creative Images & Video Images Creative Editorial Video Creative Editorial  Search by image or video I Voted Today paper sticker on mans finger on rustic wooden table

How class, identity, and political recognition shaped the Democratic Party's relationship with rural white working-class voters over two decades.

BackyardProduction/Getty Images

The Thousand Injuries: The Not-Qwhite Voter and the Politics of Recognition

In the fall of 2003, Howard Dean said he wanted to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in the back windows of their pickup trucks. It was clumsy but not dishonest. He meant that his party had written off a whole category of American voter and wanted to change that. He was attacked at once, mostly by his own side, and walked it back within forty-eight hours. The lesson his party drew was not that the outreach had been badly phrased; It was that the outreach itself was impermissible, that to pursue the rural white working class voter was to be complicit with everything he was presumed to represent. Dean was the last major Democrat to try, and the consequences have accumulated in the shape of the electoral map.

Edgar Allan Poe understood something the party still does not. "The Cask of Amontillado" opens with a line that ought to hang in every campaign office: the thousand injuries of Fortunato the narrator had borne as best he could, but when Fortunato ventured upon insult, he vowed revenge. Injuries can be borne as long as the injured man believes his tormentors still regard his suffering as real. The insult is different. It reframes the injuries as deserved, telling the sufferer he is the kind of person who deserves to suffer. Poe's narrator does not recalculate his interests; he takes his revenge at great cost to himself. That is not irrational but human, and it is the most precise framework we have for what has happened to rural white working-class voters over the last twenty years.

Keep Reading Show less