Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Macbeth’s Warning: How Ambition and Power Threaten Our Democracy

Shakespeare’s tragedy shows how unchecked ambition and rising power can erode democratic norms and stability.

Opinion

Macbeth’s Warning: How Ambition and Power Threaten Our Democracy

Engraving of three witches around a bubbling cauldron in a cave summoning an apparition of a rising demon in the background recalling a scene from Shakespeare's Macbeth..Image found in an 1881 book: "Zig Zag Journeys in the Orient" Published by John Wilson & Son, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Getty Images, KenWiedemann

“Something wicked this way comes…” chant the three witches in Shakespeare’s Macbeth, hailing the former general, now the new king of Scotland.

And indeed, something wicked this way has come to us, in the threat that we are facing to our democracy.


Macbeth is one of William Shakespeare’s shortest and darkest plays, a tragedy written over 400 years ago. It may seem odd to compare our current times with a play written in 1606, yet, as the stories from our past reveal, human nature has not changed. Shakespeare was a master of ascertaining character and chronicling the forces that act upon it, which in turn determine the fate of individuals and of nations.

Considered one of Shakespeare’s many masterpieces, Macbeth is the story of the man who would be king. Sound familiar?

It is an exploration of the devastating consequences of unbridled political ambition. This arrogance is considered so frightening that even the actors in the play are afraid of its unleashing. It is bad luck to say the play’s name in the theatre, and instead, Macbeth is referred to as “The Scottish Play.”

At the beginning of the play, the three witches have divined General Macbeth’s future and have predicted that he is going to be king. Once Macbeth gets a glimpse of the power he will wield and a taste of his predicted future glory, he will not be satiated until he has claimed the crown. To do so, he must kill the legitimate king. With his wife’s cajoling and assistance, he does. More murders must then be committed to cover up his first crime and to keep his hold on power.

During his reign of tyranny, Macbeth becomes paranoid, oblivious to his blind ambition. He expresses himself in soliloquies, as he does not have a “platform” for his rants, like “Truth Social.”

The witches have helped create the “monster” Macbeth has become, but “ego” plus the quest for power is a fatal potion with or without witches. If there are witches in our modern story, the press played the part in our current president’s accession. Back in 2016, there were 17 major candidates for the Republican nomination for president, and most political pundits thought his candidacy was largely a joke. But, after each of the 12 debates (except one he skipped in Des Moines), the media were far more interested in a sensational sound bite than any context. Fitting their bill was Donald Trump, with his penchant for controversy, dependably orchestrating a press conference that looked more like the final of a UFC Championship than a commentary on national issues.

We once did have a general who did ascend to power, our first president and the “father of our country,” George Washington. He refused to be a king, refused even to serve more than two terms as president, a voluntary ceding of power, which was basically unheard of at the time. And pretty much unheard of now as well, as the current concept of “public service” might more accurately be called “political service.” In a quote attributed to Washington, he said, “I did not overthrow George III (the King of England during the Revolutionary War) to become George I (or the first king of our newly formed democracy)." Washington lived that quote, proving his belief in its essence by his actions. He was tremendously popular and a war hero—he could have been king.

The theme of ambition and the corrupting nature of power is played out daily in our national arena. Unchecked ambition leads to destruction.

Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely. (Lord Acton)

We in this country have a system of checks and balances to right us when we go too far left or too far right, or just too far. Will we demand that those we elected uphold these balances and do their jobs? Or, will we, like Lady Macbeth, after helping her husband murder the king, suffer the consequences and be forever washing the blood off our hands?

The story of Macbeth warns us that unchallenged authority degrades moral authority, very often leading to unethical behavior. And in its extreme, it leads to total corruption.

The “wicked coming this way” is this abuse of power.

So, here we are, 250 years after the inception of our nation, ready to celebrate its Semiquincentennial. And we have never, and do not—yet—have a king.

But we do have a “ruler.”

It is our Constitution.


Amy Lockard is an Iowa resident who regularly contributes to regional newspapers and periodicals. She is working on the second of a four-book fictional series based on Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice."


Read More

Allies United Holds Cross‑Community Meetings to Protect Civil Rights Across Chicagoland

Fight For Today For A Better Tomorrow sign

Canva

Allies United Holds Cross‑Community Meetings to Protect Civil Rights Across Chicagoland

En español

Operation Midway Blitz outraged much of the Chicagoland community last September when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents raided neighborhoods, arrested thousands of individuals, and fatally shot Mexican immigrant Silverio Villegas González.

Witnessing these injustices across the country and in Chicago, two local coalitions came together last year to form Allies United, a Chicago-based coalition initially focused on responding to immigration raids, and now prioritizing protecting civil rights and building long-term cross‑community solidarity.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Republic at 250: What History Teaches — and What Americans Must Choose
white red and blue textile

A Republic at 250: What History Teaches — and What Americans Must Choose

As the United States approaches both a consequential election cycle and the 250th anniversary of its founding, Americans stand at a crossroads the framers anticipated but hoped we would never reach: a moment when citizens must decide whether to allow the Republic to erode or restore it through vigilance. This is not about left or right. It is about whether we still share a common vision of the country we want to be — and whether we still believe in the same Republic.

The Founders never imagined “the land of the free” as a place dependent on benevolent leaders. They built a system in which the people — not the government — were the safeguards against overreach. James Madison warned that “the accumulation of all powers…in the same hands…may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny,” a reminder that freedom depends on restraint, not trust in any single individual. George Washington pledged that the Constitution would remain “the guide which I will never abandon,” signaling that loyalty to the Republic must always outweigh loyalty to any leader. These were not ceremonial lines. They were instructions — a blueprint for preventing institutional strain, polarization, and distrust we see today.

Keep ReadingShow less
A document representing the Declaration of Independence.

As trust in institutions declines, America’s 250th anniversary offers a chance to rediscover the civic lessons, leadership principles, and democratic values that sustain a republic.

Getty Images

America at 250: Will We Learn from Our Past?

We call it the American Experiment. Yet too often we celebrate it without studying it, invoke it without interrogating it, and inherit it without improving it. A republic designed to learn from experience cannot afford to ignore its own lessons from history.

As the United States approaches the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, the country faces a deeper question than how to celebrate its founding. Do we still know how to learn from it?

Keep ReadingShow less
Person holding a sign in front of the U.S. capitol that reads, "We The People."

The nation has reached a divide in the road—a moment when Americans must decide whether to accept a slow weakening of the Republic or insist on the principles that have held it together for more than two centuries

Getty Images

A Republic Under Strain—And a Choice Ahead

Americans feel something shifting beneath their feet — quieter than crisis but unmistakably a strain. Many live with a steady sense of uncertainty, conflict, and the emotional weight of issues that seem impossible to escape. They feel unheard, unsafe, or unsure whether the Republic they trust is fading. Friends, relatives, and former colleagues say they’ve tried to look away just to cope, hoping the turmoil will pass. And they ask the same thing: if the framers made the people the primary control on government, how will they help set the Republic back on a steadier path?

Understanding the strain Americans are experiencing is essential, but so is recognizing the choice we still have. Madison’s warning offers the answer the framers left us: when trust erodes and power concentrates, the Constitution turns back to the people—not as a slogan, but as a structural reality.

Keep ReadingShow less