Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Macbeth’s Warning: How Ambition and Power Threaten Our Democracy

Shakespeare’s tragedy shows how unchecked ambition and rising power can erode democratic norms and stability.

Opinion

Macbeth’s Warning: How Ambition and Power Threaten Our Democracy

Engraving of three witches around a bubbling cauldron in a cave summoning an apparition of a rising demon in the background recalling a scene from Shakespeare's Macbeth..Image found in an 1881 book: "Zig Zag Journeys in the Orient" Published by John Wilson & Son, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Getty Images, KenWiedemann

“Something wicked this way comes…” chant the three witches in Shakespeare’s Macbeth, hailing the former general, now the new king of Scotland.

And indeed, something wicked this way has come to us, in the threat that we are facing to our democracy.


Macbeth is one of William Shakespeare’s shortest and darkest plays, a tragedy written over 400 years ago. It may seem odd to compare our current times with a play written in 1606, yet, as the stories from our past reveal, human nature has not changed. Shakespeare was a master of ascertaining character and chronicling the forces that act upon it, which in turn determine the fate of individuals and of nations.

Considered one of Shakespeare’s many masterpieces, Macbeth is the story of the man who would be king. Sound familiar?

It is an exploration of the devastating consequences of unbridled political ambition. This arrogance is considered so frightening that even the actors in the play are afraid of its unleashing. It is bad luck to say the play’s name in the theatre, and instead, Macbeth is referred to as “The Scottish Play.”

At the beginning of the play, the three witches have divined General Macbeth’s future and have predicted that he is going to be king. Once Macbeth gets a glimpse of the power he will wield and a taste of his predicted future glory, he will not be satiated until he has claimed the crown. To do so, he must kill the legitimate king. With his wife’s cajoling and assistance, he does. More murders must then be committed to cover up his first crime and to keep his hold on power.

During his reign of tyranny, Macbeth becomes paranoid, oblivious to his blind ambition. He expresses himself in soliloquies, as he does not have a “platform” for his rants, like “Truth Social.”

The witches have helped create the “monster” Macbeth has become, but “ego” plus the quest for power is a fatal potion with or without witches. If there are witches in our modern story, the press played the part in our current president’s accession. Back in 2016, there were 17 major candidates for the Republican nomination for president, and most political pundits thought his candidacy was largely a joke. But, after each of the 12 debates (except one he skipped in Des Moines), the media were far more interested in a sensational sound bite than any context. Fitting their bill was Donald Trump, with his penchant for controversy, dependably orchestrating a press conference that looked more like the final of a UFC Championship than a commentary on national issues.

We once did have a general who did ascend to power, our first president and the “father of our country,” George Washington. He refused to be a king, refused even to serve more than two terms as president, a voluntary ceding of power, which was basically unheard of at the time. And pretty much unheard of now as well, as the current concept of “public service” might more accurately be called “political service.” In a quote attributed to Washington, he said, “I did not overthrow George III (the King of England during the Revolutionary War) to become George I (or the first king of our newly formed democracy)." Washington lived that quote, proving his belief in its essence by his actions. He was tremendously popular and a war hero—he could have been king.

The theme of ambition and the corrupting nature of power is played out daily in our national arena. Unchecked ambition leads to destruction.

Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely. (Lord Acton)

We in this country have a system of checks and balances to right us when we go too far left or too far right, or just too far. Will we demand that those we elected uphold these balances and do their jobs? Or, will we, like Lady Macbeth, after helping her husband murder the king, suffer the consequences and be forever washing the blood off our hands?

The story of Macbeth warns us that unchallenged authority degrades moral authority, very often leading to unethical behavior. And in its extreme, it leads to total corruption.

The “wicked coming this way” is this abuse of power.

So, here we are, 250 years after the inception of our nation, ready to celebrate its Semiquincentennial. And we have never, and do not—yet—have a king.

But we do have a “ruler.”

It is our Constitution.


Amy Lockard is an Iowa resident who regularly contributes to regional newspapers and periodicals. She is working on the second of a four-book fictional series based on Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice."


Read More

Constitution of the United State with the U.S. flag in the background.

The Framers designed a republic with the intention to manage factionalism through deliberate compromise and institutional guardrails, whereas 21st-century polarization often treats compromise as a moral failing.

Douglas Sacha, Getty Images

Our Framers on 21st Century Primaries and Polarization

The Framers would view 21st-century closed primaries and political polarization as the exact manifestation of "factionalism" they spent the 1787 Constitutional Convention trying to prevent. They would argue these systems force candidates to appeal to ideological extremes rather than the broad, moderate consensus required for stable governance.

The Danger of Factionalism: In Federalist No. 10, James Madison defined a "faction" as a group of citizens united by a passion or interest adverse to the rights of others. He argued that while factions are inevitable, their effects must be controlled. The Framers would recognize 21st-century hyper-polarization as the dominance of unyielding factions that prioritize absolute ideological purity over democratic compromise.

Keep ReadingShow less
Thoughts on an Anniversary
A table with many books and candles on it
Photo by Ryan Wallace on Unsplash

Thoughts on an Anniversary

As part of a collaboration between The Fulcrum's NextGen initiative and Made By Us, The Fulcrum is publishing Letters to America, a series created through the Youth250 project that invites Gen Z to reflect on the nation’s past, present, and future as the United States approaches its 250th anniversary.

In small towns across the nation, in accordance with ours of Madison New Jersey, we will gather to recognize an anniversary. Though this milestone has been one of many, I ask that it not be a mere nod to the curiosities of the past, but the spark of an ongoing admiration for all that led us here.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Annual 4th of July Fireworks show at North lake, Michigan.

As America approaches its 250th birthday, a reflection on patriotism, political division, resilience, and why the nation is greater than any party.

Kathy Dorsey / Getty Images

A Nation Larger Than Its Politics

As America approaches its 250th birthday, I find myself wondering whether we have lost sight of something that earlier generations understood instinctively.

Americans have never agreed on politics.

Keep ReadingShow less