Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Juneteenth: Delayed Not Denied

Opinion

Juneteenth National Holiday Celebrated In Brooklyn, New York

People attend a Juneteenth event in Brower Park on June 19, 2026 in the Crown Heights neighborhood of the Brooklyn borough in New York City.

Michael M. Santiago / Getty Images

Juneteenth is not merely a commemoration of June 19, 1865, when Union soldiers arrived in Galveston, Texas, and announced to the last enslaved Black Americans that they were free, more than two years after the Emancipation Proclamation. What began as local community gatherings to mark the end of slavery has evolved into a national holiday, with traditions including parades, prayer services, family reunions, and reflection on the enduring struggle for freedom. Juneteenth serves as a mirror held up to the nation, compelling us to engage in self-examination. What have we been? Who are we? What might we yet become?

As the United States approaches its 250th anniversary, we are called to celebrate a quarter-millennium of democracy. Yet, what form of democracy are we being asked to honor? Is it the kind that repeatedly inscribes the word “liberty” only to erase it through violence? Or is it the kind that confronts its own failures and strives toward a justice that has been too long deferred?


The attacks on democratic rule and practices observed today are not unprecedented. Such actions are as old as the Republic itself. Familiar tactics, such as voter suppression at the ballot box and systematic rollbacks of civil and electoral rights, consistently target marginalized groups. For instance, this year, several states enacted laws restricting early voting hours and limiting the use of mail-in ballots—measures that disproportionately burden communities of color and working-class voters. These are not isolated incidents of bigotry or cynicism; rather, they are foundational elements of a society that has never fully reconciled its founding contradictions. Regrettably, this has been a persistent pattern in American history.

We observe state legislatures systematically eroding the hard-won gains of the Civil Rights Movement, witnessing historical patterns of exclusion reemerge in contemporary forms. The ongoing exclusion of Black, Brown, Indigenous, poor, and immigrant voices from public discourse demonstrates that the mechanisms of denial remain active and effective, continually undermining progress. Nevertheless, delayed is NOT denied. This is the enduring lesson of Juneteenth.

This lesson has left a profound impact on those who believe in a freedom they have yet to experience. It is reflected in the persistent conviction that the arc of the moral universe bends toward justice, but only through collective effort. The narrative of Juneteenth is not one of arrival; rather, it is a historical account of prolonged, agonizing, and unjust waiting. Juneteenth also embodies a community’s faith—a steadfast belief that refused to be constrained by legal limitations. Their story demonstrates that the promise of America has always been contested, that the work of democracy remains ongoing, and that progress has consistently been met with resistance from those intent on denying others.

As the nation prepares to celebrate its 250th year, we must avoid indulging in sentimental narratives about progress. We should not conflate patriotic pageantry with genuine justice. Instead, we ought to confront the discomfort that Juneteenth evokes and critically examine how democracy can be claimed when many individuals continue to struggle for recognition, representation, and freedom.

To genuinely honor the spirit of Juneteenth, we must undertake the following actions:

  • Acknowledge the falsehood that delayed freedom constitutes true freedom. Justice that arrives belatedly inflicts harm.
  • Defend the right to vote with the same determination as those who seek to undermine it.
  • Commit to a rigorous honesty regarding the ways in which race, class, gender, and other differences are exploited to create division.
  • Recognize that democracy is not a passive inheritance but an ongoing obligation that must be renewed, protected, and expanded by each generation.

Juneteenth is not solely a Black American holiday; it is a national historical observance. It provides an opportunity to assess the gap between national promises and realities, and to solemnly celebrate while acknowledging the ongoing pursuit of freedom.

Delayed is NOT denied. However, delay is not without consequence; it is a wound that persists and a debt unpaid. Juneteenth challenges us to undertake the demanding work of democracy, not only for ourselves but also for all who have waited, and continue to wait, for the realization of freedom’s promise.


Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.


Read More

What the World Cup Teaches Us About Democracy

Charles De Ketelaere #17 of Belgium scores his team’s first goal past Unai Simon #23 of Spain during the FIFA World Cup 2026 Quarter Final match between Spain and Belgium at Los Angeles Stadium on July 10, 2026, in Inglewood, California.

(Photo by David Ramos/Getty Images)

What the World Cup Teaches Us About Democracy

As live sporting events go, nothing comes close to the World Cup. I was in the stands when South Africa, my birth country, hosted the event in 2010 after decades of exclusion from global athletics. In June of this year, I had a full-circle moment when South Africa played in the knockout rounds for the first time, and I stood with my two American sons, arms around them, singing South Africa's anthem — the only national anthem that weaves multiple languages into a single, unifying song. Later in the week, I was in the stands again, cheering Spain's win over Austria, a country to which my only connections are a brief holiday…and the fact that my mother's family fled from there during the Inquisition.

The magic of the World Cup is that everyone in the stands wears the flags and shirts of countries that are “theirs” in some way. For some, it’s where they were born; for others, where they live or where their ancestors hailed from. For some, it is simply a country they have adopted for the afternoon. It is impossible to know how deep a person’s connection runs simply by looking at them. And next to a person waving one team’s colors is a stranger, family member, or close friend supporting the opposing team—or wearing the jersey of a team that isn’t playing that day at all.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Former President Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama, former President George W. Bush, and former President Bill Clinton pose together.

Former President Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama, former President George W. Bush, and former President Bill Clinton pose ahead of the dedication ceremony for the opening of the Barack Obama Presidential Center, in John Lewis Plaza, on June 18, 2026, in Chicago, Illinois.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais - Pool / Getty Images

America Shouldn't Need a Political Savior to Hold It Together

America is waiting for a political savior, but the problem is structural.

This dynamic was illustrated during two recent broadcast appearances by journalist Katy Tur. Discussing modern secessionist movements on June 15, 2026, Tur found optimism in a poll showing 54 percent of Americans still believe we share core values, and she later expressed hope that future leaders could reunite the country.

Keep ReadingShow less
Constitution of the United State with the U.S. flag in the background.

The Framers designed a republic with the intention to manage factionalism through deliberate compromise and institutional guardrails, whereas 21st-century polarization often treats compromise as a moral failing.

Douglas Sacha, Getty Images

Our Framers on 21st Century Primaries and Polarization

The Framers would view 21st-century closed primaries and political polarization as the exact manifestation of "factionalism" they spent the 1787 Constitutional Convention trying to prevent. They would argue these systems force candidates to appeal to ideological extremes rather than the broad, moderate consensus required for stable governance.

The Danger of Factionalism: In Federalist No. 10, James Madison defined a "faction" as a group of citizens united by a passion or interest adverse to the rights of others. He argued that while factions are inevitable, their effects must be controlled. The Framers would recognize 21st-century hyper-polarization as the dominance of unyielding factions that prioritize absolute ideological purity over democratic compromise.

Keep ReadingShow less