Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Who Told You You Weren’t Already Free?

Opinion

Who Told You You Weren’t Already Free?

Mural of child blindfolded

Photo provided

As part of a collaboration between The Fulcrum's NextGen initiative and Made By Us, The Fulcrum is publishing Letters to America, a series created through the Youth250 project that invites Gen Z to reflect on the nation’s past, present, and future as the United States approaches its 250th anniversary.

Juneteenth. The nation’s 250th anniversary. Two celebrations of freedom, arriving in a season where many of us are quietly wondering whether we feel “free” at all. Our citizens are living through conditions that resemble the very terms that nearly caused our divorce. Economic freedom wanes. Our own citizens are somehow being terrorized. Elites and their technocratic allies advance their priorities while ordinary Americans absorb the fallout. Candidly, an anniversary only means something if the relationship has been maintained. No one gets credit for 250 years of marriage when the work stopped decades ago. So before these milestones arrive, we must ask ourselves: how committed are we to actualized democracy?


I grew up believing that my peers and I were the next iteration of the American experiment. That my unique life experience would augment the quest for a “more perfect Union.” Now, as I approach my three-decade mark, I find myself at an impasse. Academia taught us that, as Americans, we are inherently free. Free to express our minds, free to elect representatives who capture our voice. The truth is harder to sit with: democracy was an idea our citizens never fully enforced. We inherited the deed to a house, enjoyed every amenity, and assumed it would need minimal upkeep.

Part of the problem is the modern connotation of the word itself. We’ve become desensitized to the notion of “democracy.” For some, it’s a symbol of government, for others an affiliation with party politics. It’s been used to sell so much for so long that it stopped registering as something we’ve always owned. Try replacing it with “individual agency,” your actual ability to shape the conditions of your own life, and the stakes get more dire. Each rollback of voting rights or increase in executive power is a withdrawal from your account. So is watching the 1% get richer while your paycheck covers less than it did last year. Imagine asking permission to spend your own money while every transaction that clears covers someone else’s rent.

So what changed? The political process became something we followed rather than nurtured. Not long ago, conservatives balked at federal overreach, the mention of reparations, and excessive government spending. The narrative looks very different today. Federal hands reaching into state elections. Billion-dollar proposals that serve the connected rather than the public. The White House itself altered with little accountability, few guardrails, and no consideration for the citizens it was meant to serve. We didn’t sign anything over. We just stopped opening the statements. We politicized the process until participation shrank to picking a side once a year and arguing about it the rest of the time, and a withdrawal nobody reviews clears every single time. The people who benefit are counting on exactly that. We gave away our agency for no incentive, and we continue to, quite literally, pay the price.

So at what point did we, as Americans, decide we were powerless? Who told us we weren’t already free? Powerlessness was never announced. It was marketed gradually until it felt like the natural order. Remember that “we’re not going back” was never just a slogan. It was meant to be a boundary. Black southerners like my grandparents understood that long before it became a chant, navigating a freedom issued with conditions and learning to read the fine print the country pretended wasn’t there. They had every documented reason to believe they were powerless, yet they enforced their freedom anyway. That instinct is an inheritance, available to anyone who still believes their voice carries weight.

In a few days, grills will fire up and fireworks will go off either way. What’s actually undecided is whether we show up to our 250th as people who hold the deed or people still waiting on a landlord who was never coming. Ownership is unglamorous, and the upkeep is constant. It looks like knowing your state legislators by name, since that’s where most decisions about your daily life actually get made. It looks like reading the full ballot before election day, instead of in the parking lot. It looks like sitting through a school board meeting or a public comment period, the rooms where agency gets exercised or quietly forfeited. But maintenance is the difference between an anniversary and a postmortem.

Nobody is coming to hand you your freedom, because it was never anyone’s to take. It’s been sitting in your name this whole time.

So again I ask: who told you that you weren’t already free? No matter what your answer may be, they never truly had the authority to.

T. Malik Ross, 29, Jackson, MS


Read More

Voter receives a pen from poll worker at polling station.

A civic petition calling for constitutional restraint, civil discourse, bipartisan cooperation, and equal justice to strengthen American democracy and national unity.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

A Contemporary Olive Branch Petition

To the President of the United States, the Leaders of the Congress, and Our Fellow Americans Entrusted with the Powers of Government:

When, in the ordinary course of a free republic, disagreements arise among citizens concerning the proper exercise of power, it is neither unusual nor dishonorable that earnest convictions should differ. Such diversity has long been the strength of our nation, for liberty has never depended upon unanimity of opinion, but upon mutual respect under a common Constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close-up shot of a Black woman's hands receiving a mail-in ballot to vote in a USA Presidential, Senatorial, Congressional, or local election

Federal investigators spent eight months reviewing the Allied Pilots Association election, examining ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and transparency before allowing the results to stand.

Jeremy Poland/Getty Images

What a Federal Investigation of a Union Election Can Teach Us About Democratic Trust

For eight months, federal investigators examined allegations involving ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and reporting procedures in a contested union election before allowing the result to stand.

Following a disputed election within the Allied Pilots Association (APA), complaints led to a formal review by the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Labor-Management Standards. Investigators spent months going through election records, audit logs, witness testimony and technical documentation before reaching their conclusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
50501 Movement – Thomas Paine’s Political Philosophy in the 21st Century

circa 1770: The English-born American revolutionary philosopher Thomas Paine, (1737 - 1809), who wrote and published 'The Rights of Man', (1791 - 1792), in England. In it he expressed his support for the French Revolution and called for the overthrow of the British monarchy.

(Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

50501 Movement – Thomas Paine’s Political Philosophy in the 21st Century

The 50501 Movement can be viewed as a 21st-century manifestation of the anti-authoritarian, pro-egalitarian framework that Thomas Paine championed in Common Sense. Both movements share a core belief in challenging entrenched power and mobilizing the collective voice of everyday people to defend democracy. By utilizing decentralized, nationwide grassroots mobilization to challenge executive overreach and billionaire consolidation, the 50501 movement directly echoes Paine’s anti-authoritarianism, his belief in collective civic power, and his demand that power remains in the hands of the people.

The 50501 Movement mirrors the spirit of Paine’s Common Sense through three primary parallels:

Keep ReadingShow less
  Creative Images & Video Creative Images & Video Images Creative Editorial Video Creative Editorial  Search by image or video I Voted Today paper sticker on mans finger on rustic wooden table

How class, identity, and political recognition shaped the Democratic Party's relationship with rural white working-class voters over two decades.

BackyardProduction/Getty Images

The Thousand Injuries: The Not-Qwhite Voter and the Politics of Recognition

In the fall of 2003, Howard Dean said he wanted to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in the back windows of their pickup trucks. It was clumsy but not dishonest. He meant that his party had written off a whole category of American voter and wanted to change that. He was attacked at once, mostly by his own side, and walked it back within forty-eight hours. The lesson his party drew was not that the outreach had been badly phrased; It was that the outreach itself was impermissible, that to pursue the rural white working class voter was to be complicit with everything he was presumed to represent. Dean was the last major Democrat to try, and the consequences have accumulated in the shape of the electoral map.

Edgar Allan Poe understood something the party still does not. "The Cask of Amontillado" opens with a line that ought to hang in every campaign office: the thousand injuries of Fortunato the narrator had borne as best he could, but when Fortunato ventured upon insult, he vowed revenge. Injuries can be borne as long as the injured man believes his tormentors still regard his suffering as real. The insult is different. It reframes the injuries as deserved, telling the sufferer he is the kind of person who deserves to suffer. Poe's narrator does not recalculate his interests; he takes his revenge at great cost to himself. That is not irrational but human, and it is the most precise framework we have for what has happened to rural white working-class voters over the last twenty years.

Keep ReadingShow less