Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Protestors, Representatives Raise Concerns about the President’s FY 2027 Budget Cuts to Healthcare

News

Protestors, Representatives Raise Concerns about the President’s FY 2027 Budget Cuts to Healthcare

Protestors raised signs reading, “PROTECT PEPFAR FROM VOUGHT” and “VOUGHT’S CUTS KILLS PEOPLE WITH AIDS” at the president’s FY 2027 budget request hearing on April 15.

Credit: Amy L. Wong

WASHINGTON — Tensions erupted during Wednesday’s House hearing on President Donald Trump’s budget, as several representatives and protestors pressured a top White House official about their healthcare concerns.

The hearing featured Russell Vought, the director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, to discuss the president’s plans to defund many programs and move money to fight the war abroad.


Within the first half hour, protesters began chanting about their discontent with Trump’s plans to cut the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief program.

“PEPFAR saves lives, spend the money,” several people repeated. Some of their signs read, “PROTECT PEPFAR FROM VOUGHT” and “VOUGHT’S CUTS KILL PEOPLE WITH AIDS.”

U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, also referred to as PEPFAR, was created in 2003 by Republican President George W. Bush. According to the U.S. Department of State, PEPFAR is credited with saving 26 million lives. Congress provided over $4.6 billion in FY 2026.

The administration, in its budget request, declared that 60% of PEPFAR funds were misused and announced its plans to “eliminate disease-specific accounts.”

Congress has authority over spending, according to the Constitution, and can accept parts of the budget request, none, or all of it.

Members of Congress questioned Vought about cuts to health care. He often redirected the conversation to fraud when Democrats questioned him about the pain deep cuts could cause.

For example, Rep. Brendan Boyle, D-PA, referred to the Congressional Budget Office’s estimate that 16 million Americans would lose healthcare because of the “One Big Beautiful Act” and two other policies under the second Trump administration.

“Are they really all, according to you, really, you’re going to sit here with a straight face and say, ‘They’re all illegals. They’re all defrauding the system.’ That’s actually your position?”

Vought responded by saying, “Yes, with regard to people who—” Boyle interjected by saying, “That’s laughable.”

Vought clarified that he does not think all 16 million who will lose health care are illegal, but he thought that the rest are able-bodied and should not receive subsidized health care.

Boyle later asked, “Okay, so they’re all either illegals or defrauding the system?”

“Well, that’s certainly not a provocative statement that we got fraud all over the country,” Vought said.

Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman, D-NJ, asked Vought if he would apologize to the people who died because of cuts to international aid.

Worldwide, over 300,000 people have died due to USAID cuts, according to a tracker created by Brooke Nichols, an associate professor of global health at Boston University and an infectious disease mathematical modeler.

She also pressed Vought about children in poor countries who lack health care because the U.S. government stopped providing it.

“If a mother came before you, and told you that her child died because she didn’t have access to healthcare or medicine that usually would be available because of the kindness of the United States of America, that you and this administration have eliminated, would you have anything of empathy, compassion, and humanity to say to her?” Coleman asked. “Would you say to her, ‘I am sorry that was a mistake?’”

Vought responded with, “I always have empathy for individuals, including those that get improper and false information from the media that pumps this false and ignorant information out to the American people.”

Rep. Josh Brecheen, R-OK, asked if Vought had any suggestions on how Congress can address healthcare fraud.

“Are there further reforms that Congress should consider to help reduce fraud in the healthcare system?” Brecheen said.

Vought said that a review should be done to check “whether agencies have enough resources to do the fraud hunting.” He also said there are obstacles to consider that make it “impossible” to identify fraud. The example he provided states withholding information about the recipients on their “roles” He did not clarify which roles he was referring to.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-WA, said the “One Big Beautiful Bill” was unpopular because of its impact on healthcare and the national budget.

“Congratulations, Mr. Vought, both you and Donald Trump have managed to successfully take the futures of millions of Americans. It is not beautiful to strip healthcare for millions of Americans,” Jayapal said.

Amy L. Wong is a graduate student in journalism with Northwestern University’s Medill School of Journalism.


Read More

economics graph on blackboard

economics graph on blackboard

Getty Images

What Post-1971 Supply-side Economics Has Done to Veterans

Post-1971 supply-side economics—often referred to as "trickle-down economics" or "Reaganomics” fundamentally transformed the relationship between the federal government and military veterans. The year 1971 marked the end of the Bretton Woods system, the closing of the gold window, and a pivot toward neoliberal economic frameworks that prioritized deregulation, sweeping tax cuts, and aggressive federal deficit reduction via domestic spending cuts.

For veterans, who had previously benefited from the expansive, New Deal-style social investments of the original G.I. Bill, this macroeconomic paradigm shift led to four distinct structural consequences:

Keep ReadingShow less
Bank sign
The bank of ornate classical columns and facade
Photo by Leo_Visions on Unsplash

A Bank Account Should Not Come with a Political Litmus Test

The ongoing appetite for "debanking"—pressuring financial institutions to cut off customers because of who they are, what they believe, or with whom they associate—should concern everyone. Why? Because in the end, anyone can become an easy target.

One pressure point has been protests against private banks whose customers are companies who build or operate immigration detention facilities under contracts with the Trump administration. The Boston area saw such protests earlier this year, and there have been others.

Keep ReadingShow less
Oil and Energy Crisis Concept on chart over a world map

Oil and Energy Crisis Concept on chart over a world map , Stock price fell, Stock Market Volatility

Getty Images

The Oil Crisis Is an Opportunity to Develop a Different Kind of Politics

On September 14, American oil executives delivered some alarming news. “The great oil crisis is here.”

As the Wall Street Journal explained, “Commercial fuel stocks around the world have been depleting for more than six months, and strategic crude reserves can’t be tapped much further. Attacks last week shut down a crucial crude pipeline in Saudi Arabia that bypassed the Strait, stranding at least 2.5 million barrels a day from an already tight global oil market….”

Keep ReadingShow less
A male senior stands in the shadow of a Social Security card with bite missing.

Social Security faces automatic cuts in 2032 and Medicare in 2033. New polling suggests that gives Democrats a powerful election issue. Here’s the case.

DNY59 / Getty Images

Will the Debt Crisis Engineered by Republicans Succeed in Cutting Social Security and Medicare?

Overview

The Republican Party’s long game to reduce administrative state entitlement spending centers on creating a debt crisis to provide an excuse for limiting such spending. It may soon pay off. That strategy involved a quarter-century of engineered tax cuts responsible for the stunning rise in sovereign U.S. debt, threatening an eventual economic crisis.

Social Security benefits are projected under current law to be automatically cut in 2032. And Medicare benefits are projected to be automatically cut in 2033. Congressional Republicans intend for those automatic cuts to occur, opposing new taxes to prevent cuts. And they are using the ballooning national debt as an excuse to also oppose new general revenue spending to prevent benefit cuts.

Keep ReadingShow less