Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Best Utility Is a Public Utility

Opinion

The Best Utility Is a Public Utility
black and white electric meter
Photo by Jon Moore on Unsplash

Utilities are boring until the power goes out. US Census data shows that one in three households struggles to pay their energy bills, resulting in millions of electricity shut-offs each year. Poor management by electric companies leads to more outages and wildfires. At the same time, many of us feel that we have little say in energy decisions that affect us. In Utah, the recent approval of a data center twice the size of Manhattan has left residents struggling with the real cost of growing electricity demand—on the environment and on our wallets.

Often overlooked in the conversation about cost is the fact that most of our utility sector is run for profit. There is a better way. I’m a public power organizer in New York’s Hudson Valley, and people like me from St. Petersburg, Florida, to Ann Arbor, Michigan, are fighting to take control of our investor-owned utilities and turn them public. Making electricity not-for-profit and community-owned means lower bills for customers and more say in our shared resources.


Public utilities work as a division of local government. Some utilities are traditionally public, like water. It’s not hard to understand why ensuring equitable, safe, and reliable access to water is not something we want competing with a profit motive. Electricity should be run similarly.

Where public electric utilities exist—the entire state of Nebraska, for example, as well as cities like LA and San Antonio—customers pay lower rates. Over the last three years, the American Economic Liberties Project reports that residential electricity rates for privately owned utilities have increased by 49% more than inflation, while those for publicly owned utilities have increased by 44% less than inflation.

Savings from public utilities come from different sources, such as cutting shareholder profits. There are other benefits of going public, too: Investor-owned utilities often charge customers for lobbyists and lawyers that help them secure high rates. Public utilities can borrow money more cheaply - they have access to municipal bonds – and those savings are passed along to customers, too.

The real advantage of a public electric company, though, is that its incentives are aligned with its customers, not its shareholders. For-profit utilities are rewarded for building the most expensive systems possible, and they often defer cheap maintenance and low-cost efficiency upgrades that would better serve customers and keep us online. We already know that there are several simple, cost-effective ways to improve utility performance: replacing old lines, installing distributed energy resources like batteries and solar panels, and implementing programs to adjust energy use during peak hours. But investing in maintenance means fewer shareholder profits.

The consequences of this deferred maintenance are easy to spot. People with public utilities have 90 fewer minutes without power each year than people with for-profit electric. This year alone, five states—Texas, Louisiana, Alabama, Tennessee, and Mississippi—face the risk of blackouts from storms and heat waves.

The increasing fights over data centers highlight the risk of leaving our electricity decisions in the hands of executives who live far from the territories they serve. In publicly run utilities, community members form a board that oversees the utility, giving them a voice in rates and the sources of our electricity.

Private utilities - and the industry associations representing them- oppose the transition to cheap and clean energy like solar, even when it means customers’ bills could plummet. This is because when energy is cheap, utility companies won’t be able to deliver high returns to shareholders or make money by building more expensive infrastructure.

Some may wonder what’s so bad about utilities making a profit; after all, even small businesses need to earn more than they spend. But electric utilities are state-granted monopolies. You don’t have a choice about whether you are served by PG&E in San Francisco or ConEd in New York. You can’t opt out of an exploitative for-profit electricity company or shop around for better rates or cleaner energy. This makes electric utilities particularly liable to abuse their power.

Private utilities’ profits are soaring while we struggle with our bills, and many investor-owned companies are using their money to try to crush campaigns to take investor-owned utilities public. But it doesn’t have to be that way.

Movements for public power are gathering momentum, pointing the way to cheaper, cleaner energy. People can join these fights where they are already happening and start them elsewhere. Write to your local elected officials, support existing campaigns, and connect with local organizers.

Electricity powers hospitals, schools, and homes. It is a public good, and we should treat it that way.

Shivani Radhakrishnan is an assistant professor of political philosophy at Vassar and a Public Voices Fellow with The OpEd Project in partnership with the Paul and Daisy Soros Foundation.


Read More

People talking near a river

Enjoying the Wild Mile in Chicago, Illinois

Jerry Attere

How a Floating Eco-Park Is Bringing Wildlife Back to the Chicago River

If you were to walk next to the Chicago River on North Ave, you’d find a ramp tucked away between venues and restaurants, seemingly leading down to river itself. Walking down it, you wouldn’t just find the river, but a sprawling park full of lush wildlife—the Wild Mile, a planned 17-acre floating eco-park along the North Branch Canal of the Chicago River.

Collin Quinn comes to the Wild Mile a few times a year to canoe along the river with his friends. “We go other places, but this is a real easy, convenient place for us,” he said. “Occasionally, we’ll see ducks or fish or animals in there. I like seeing it grow every year.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Students sitting at a table listening to a speaker.

Tucson youth members of the Arizona Youth Climate Coalition listen as Rep. Adelita Grijalva talks about the importance of youth voices on the issue of climate change and extreme heat. More than a dozen Arizona youth met with Representative Adelita Grijalva and Ward 5 council member Selina Barajas on Tuesday, at El Pueblo Activity Center in Tucson, to share some of their concerns about climate change, as well as some of the work they are already doing to address these issues.

Credit: Stephanie Casanova

Arizona Youth Tell Lawmakers: Climate Change Can’t Wait

When Carmen De Backer was a toddler, she would sit on the couch staring at photos of wildlife in the worn pages of National Geographic magazines her mom bought at the thrift store. She couldn’t read the articles so she would ask her older sisters to tell her about the wildlife in the photos.

That’s where her love for and curiosity about nature started.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Utah’s H.B. 222 Set the Stage for State-level Climate Liability Shields
A factory with smoke coming out of it
Photo by Anthony Maw on Unsplash

How Utah’s H.B. 222 Set the Stage for State-level Climate Liability Shields

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Background

Keep ReadingShow less