Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Latino Voters Raise Alarms Over AI Data Centers’ Water, Energy, and Pollution Impacts

News

Latino Voters Raise Alarms Over AI Data Centers’ Water, Energy, and Pollution Impacts

environmental justice

AI generated

A new national poll finds Latino voters increasingly concerned about the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) data centers — especially when those facilities are built near their communities. The survey, conducted by Blue Rose Research for Climate Power En Acción, shows strong opposition to data‑center development tied to rising utility costs, water shortages, and pollution.

According to the poll, 58% of Latino voters oppose building AI data centers near residential areas when the question is framed around higher electricity bills, compared to just 18% who support it. Concerns remain high even when the focus shifts to water usage: 56% oppose construction if it risks reducing local water supplies.


Antonieta Cádiz, Executive Director of Climate Power En Acción, said the findings reflect what Latino communities have been expressing for years. “Our families live in the most polluted and vulnerable areas. With the expansion of data centers, there is strong concern in the community about the impact on electricity costs, water consumption, and air pollution,” Cádiz said. “This survey confirms what we hear time and time again: our communities want clean, affordable energy that reduces pollution, not empty promises from companies and politicians they don’t trust. Tech companies can’t be given a blank check; they must consider the impact they have on the communities where they build their data centers and act accordingly.”

The poll also shows overwhelming support for clean‑energy requirements: 59% of Latino voters say data centers should be required to run on clean energy, even if that slows construction. Only 19% believe they should be allowed to use any available energy source.

These concerns are emerging as data‑center development accelerates nationwide. Roughly one‑third of all U.S. data centers built or planned are located in communities where people of color make up at least 40% of residents, according to Climate Power’s memo.

Environmental‑justice advocates say this pattern mirrors long‑standing inequities. The Center for Biological Diversity, along with nearly 120 community and climate organizations, recently urged Congress to reject efforts to fast‑track AI data centers through permitting reform. Their letter warns that data‑center expansion is “deepening environmental injustice by concentrating facilities in low‑income communities and communities of color already overburdened by pollution and limited resources.”

LaTricea D. Adams, CEO of Young, Gifted & Green, said the stakes are clear: “Our democratic process was sidelined when our most powerful leaders championed a data center while community voices were shut out. What happens in Memphis can happen in cities and states across the country.”

Across the U.S., local governments are beginning to push back. In June, voters in Monterey Park, California, approved a citywide ban on new data centers with 86.4% support, making it the first city in the country to enact such a prohibition. Residents cited concerns about electricity demand, industrial infrastructure, and environmental impacts associated with AI‑driven data‑center growth. Mayor Elizabeth Yang said the landslide vote reflected “sustained resident organizing and civic engagement” and a commitment to “listening to residents.”

Globally, researchers warn that the boom in AI infrastructure is reshaping communities in ways that echo extractive industries. Ethnographer Steven Gonzalez Monserrate describes the trend as “terraforming,” arguing that tech giants are “taking land” and “natural resources” while influencing political decisions and creating “new colonialism” through digital infrastructure.

For Latino voters, the Climate Power poll suggests the issue is not abstract. It is about the tangible costs of electricity, the availability of water, and the health impacts of pollution — all in communities that already face disproportionate environmental burdens. As AI companies race to build more data centers, Latino voters are signaling they want safeguards, transparency, and clean‑energy commitments before these facilities reshape their neighborhoods.

Latino Voters Raise Alarms Over AI Data Centers’ Water, Energy, and Pollution Impacts was first published by the Latino News Network and republished with permission.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of The Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network, and twice president of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.


Read More

Students sitting at a table listening to a speaker.

Tucson youth members of the Arizona Youth Climate Coalition listen as Rep. Adelita Grijalva talks about the importance of youth voices on the issue of climate change and extreme heat. More than a dozen Arizona youth met with Representative Adelita Grijalva and Ward 5 council member Selina Barajas on Tuesday, at El Pueblo Activity Center in Tucson, to share some of their concerns about climate change, as well as some of the work they are already doing to address these issues.

Credit: Stephanie Casanova

Arizona Youth Tell Lawmakers: Climate Change Can’t Wait

When Carmen De Backer was a toddler, she would sit on the couch staring at photos of wildlife in the worn pages of National Geographic magazines her mom bought at the thrift store. She couldn’t read the articles so she would ask her older sisters to tell her about the wildlife in the photos.

That’s where her love for and curiosity about nature started.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Utah’s H.B. 222 Set the Stage for State-level Climate Liability Shields
A factory with smoke coming out of it
Photo by Anthony Maw on Unsplash

How Utah’s H.B. 222 Set the Stage for State-level Climate Liability Shields

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Background

Keep ReadingShow less
Red rock formations in the "Valley of the Gods."

Red rock formations in the "Valley of the Gods" on April 22, 2026 in Bears Ears National Monument, Utah. Bears Ears has been a controversial Monument since it's creation in December of 2016.

George Frey / Getty Images

When Public Lands Become Real Estate

Last week, in his latest attempted liquidation of our shared heritage, President Trump signed two executive orders eviscerating protections for close to three million acres of our national monuments: Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante. From the Oval Office, a president who has never even seen these sacred sites reduced them by roughly 90%, dwarfing his 2017 attempt at a similar land grab by about a million acres, leaving only 300,000 acres of protected land. These cuts will directly threaten critical wildlife habitats, put nearly 100,000 irreplaceable archaeological sites at risk of destruction, and fracture an interconnected indigenous homeland that has been stewarded by Native tribes since time immemorial. To Trump, it’s just another real estate deal.

The Trump regime has tried to portray this set-up to sell off as an effort to restore public access. During the Oval Office photo op where the president signed the proclamations, he said of the monuments: “You can’t go hunting. You can’t go fishing. You can’t do anything. You can virtually not even walk on it.” That is, to put it mildly, a malicious lie. All your favorite forms of outdoor recreation—from hiking and camping to fishing and hunting—are allowed there, which Trump might know if he had ever visited the land he decided is not worth preserving. In fact, the Antiquities Act doesn’t limit ordinary public use but rather the extent to which an area can be subject to mining and drilling. So much for the land of the free. Trump wants to make it a whole lot easier for extractive industries and private development interests to privatize and pillage these sacred lands for financial gain. Home of the brave? Not an ounce of courage to refuse the fuel lobby when it comes to our public lands. At least the law is on our side. As the President of the National Parks Conservation Association put it, this is both “a betrayal to the American people and illegal.”

Keep ReadingShow less