Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Data Crisis Deepens as Agencies Face Cuts, Disruptions, and Declining Trust

Cuts and chaos in federal data systems leave policymakers struggling for facts.

Opinion

Digital generated image of multiple white cubes with abstract economy graphs and charts.

Policy experts discuss how funding cuts, agency disruptions, and declining trust are affecting U.S. public data—and the innovative solutions emerging to fill critical gaps.

Andriy Onufriyenko/Getty Images

Policy experts at every level of government require solid facts and data to come to the best decisions for their constituencies. However, especially as the second Trump Administration took over executive agencies in 2025, the data world has faced unprecedented new challenges. These include funding cuts that limit agencies' ability to gather and maintain data, frequent leadership changes that disrupt continuity, increased constraints on accountability and oversight, and disruptions in key statistical divisions. The combination of these challenges has made it significantly harder for policy professionals to rely on consistent, high-quality data.

Some of these issues were explored recently in an illuminating webinar which is part of the Democracy and Public Service Initiative, a partnership between the National Academy of Public Administration and the Bridge Alliance. The panel was moderated by Democracy and Public Service Initiative Fellow Joel Gurin, President and Founder of Center for Open Data Enterprise (CODE). “It is a fraught issue and one where we need to seek a lot of creative solutions,” Gurin said.


Beth Jarosz, Vice President of the Association of Public Data Users, observed that the field faced significant challenges even prior to 2025, but conditions have deteriorated markedly in the past two years. Jarosz stated, “We went from slowly eroding budgets and not being able to modernize to wholesale disruption of entire statistical divisions like the National Center for Education Statistics, the removal of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, major cuts in agency staffing, and increasing rules that constrain the accountability and oversight of those agencies.”

A pollster by training, Chris Jackson, SSRS Civil Society Research Lead, referenced surveys his group has conducted with the “data user community,” including businesses, academics, local governments, and nonprofits. He said 93 percent of those surveyed noted they were impacted in some fashion. It ranged from “delayed programs they were working on because the data wasn’t accessible, or canceling of programs because the data wasn’t available.

Francesa Perucci, Director of Policy and Partnership at Open Data Watch, is an expert in international data research and “citizen data,” the practice of public participation and collaboration in scientific research, where everyday volunteers collect, analyze, or report data. She noted that citizen data is one potential solution to a data crisis. “Citizen data responds to the erosion of trust in data. You provide agency to citizens, so you engage them. You get better representation and inclusion, stronger relevance, and overall fill the data gaps,” Perucci said.

Stefaan Verhulst, Co-Founder of GovLab, noted that while the world may be enjoying an “AI Summer,” we’re also experiencing a “data winter.” “We’re seeing a decline of trust but also accessibility,” he said. But Verhulst, an expert in “nontraditional data,” also noted that we’re experiencing an explosion in the sheer volume of data available as the world converts to a digital age. “How do we reuse this massive amount of data that has resulted from digital instrumentation and transactions for public interest purposes and complementing official statistics?” Verhulst said.

You can watch the entire webinar recording here:

Meeting the Challenge of Measurement;” A NAPA Technology Standing Panel, CODE, and Bridge Alliance Webinar


Bradford Fitch is a Senior Advisor to the Bridge Alliance, former CEO of the Congressional Management Foundation, and author of “Citizen’s Handbook for Influencing Elected Officials."


Read More

An Iranian flag and the message "No King" graffitied on the ruins of the data center building of Sharif University of Technology after a U.S.-Israeli missile strike on April 7, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

How has the meaning of military victory changed? Explore Iran, deterrence, nuclear weapons, and why modern wars are fought with limited objectives.

Kaveh Kazemi/Getty Images

The Last War We Understood

Every modern conflict seems to produce the same debate.

Supporters argue that military action achieved its objectives. Critics ask why the enemy still exists. Iran is only the latest example.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Enduring Illusion of Article the first
a large white building with a flag on top of it

The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

This is the third and final installment of our series on “Article the first.” Previous parts examined the history of the single inverted word that turned an intended floor into a ceiling and its impact on the amendment’s failed ratification. This concluding part outlines the path forward for enlarging the House today.

Part 3 — The Path Forward

Keep ReadingShow less
The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

Painting from 1856 by Junius Brutus Stearns of George Washington at the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

This is the second of a three-part series on the First Amendment proposed by Congress in 1789—often called “Article the first”—which was never ratified. Part 1 explained how a single inverted word in the text created a mathematical absurdity that has been misread for 237 years. This second part explores the untold history of how that defect affected the original ratification process in state legislatures.

Part 2 — The Untold History

Keep ReadingShow less
Bill of Rights
Happy 230th birthday, Bill of Rights
leezsnow/Getty Images

The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

This is the first of three parts exploring “Article the First,” the forgotten proposal in the original Bill of Rights. For 237 years, a single, inverted word has created a “semantic illusion,” leading historians and policymakers to misread the founders' intended guarantee of a growing House as a ceiling. This series uncovers the error, tracks its consequences, and explores why reclaiming the founders’ original vision is the path to meaningful representation reform.

Part 1 — The Inverted Word

Keep ReadingShow less