Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Data Crisis Deepens as Agencies Face Cuts, Disruptions, and Declining Trust

Cuts and chaos in federal data systems leave policymakers struggling for facts.

Opinion

Digital generated image of multiple white cubes with abstract economy graphs and charts.

Policy experts discuss how funding cuts, agency disruptions, and declining trust are affecting U.S. public data—and the innovative solutions emerging to fill critical gaps.

Andriy Onufriyenko/Getty Images

Policy experts at every level of government require solid facts and data to come to the best decisions for their constituencies. However, especially as the second Trump Administration took over executive agencies in 2025, the data world has faced unprecedented new challenges. These include funding cuts that limit agencies' ability to gather and maintain data, frequent leadership changes that disrupt continuity, increased constraints on accountability and oversight, and disruptions in key statistical divisions. The combination of these challenges has made it significantly harder for policy professionals to rely on consistent, high-quality data.

Some of these issues were explored recently in an illuminating webinar which is part of the Democracy and Public Service Initiative, a partnership between the National Academy of Public Administration and the Bridge Alliance. The panel was moderated by Democracy and Public Service Initiative Fellow Joel Gurin, President and Founder of Center for Open Data Enterprise (CODE). “It is a fraught issue and one where we need to seek a lot of creative solutions,” Gurin said.


Beth Jarosz, Vice President of the Association of Public Data Users, observed that the field faced significant challenges even prior to 2025, but conditions have deteriorated markedly in the past two years. Jarosz stated, “We went from slowly eroding budgets and not being able to modernize to wholesale disruption of entire statistical divisions like the National Center for Education Statistics, the removal of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, major cuts in agency staffing, and increasing rules that constrain the accountability and oversight of those agencies.”

A pollster by training, Chris Jackson, SSRS Civil Society Research Lead, referenced surveys his group has conducted with the “data user community,” including businesses, academics, local governments, and nonprofits. He said 93 percent of those surveyed noted they were impacted in some fashion. It ranged from “delayed programs they were working on because the data wasn’t accessible, or canceling of programs because the data wasn’t available.

Francesa Perucci, Director of Policy and Partnership at Open Data Watch, is an expert in international data research and “citizen data,” the practice of public participation and collaboration in scientific research, where everyday volunteers collect, analyze, or report data. She noted that citizen data is one potential solution to a data crisis. “Citizen data responds to the erosion of trust in data. You provide agency to citizens, so you engage them. You get better representation and inclusion, stronger relevance, and overall fill the data gaps,” Perucci said.

Stefaan Verhulst, Co-Founder of GovLab, noted that while the world may be enjoying an “AI Summer,” we’re also experiencing a “data winter.” “We’re seeing a decline of trust but also accessibility,” he said. But Verhulst, an expert in “nontraditional data,” also noted that we’re experiencing an explosion in the sheer volume of data available as the world converts to a digital age. “How do we reuse this massive amount of data that has resulted from digital instrumentation and transactions for public interest purposes and complementing official statistics?” Verhulst said.

You can watch the entire webinar recording here:

Meeting the Challenge of Measurement;” A NAPA Technology Standing Panel, CODE, and Bridge Alliance Webinar


Bradford Fitch is a Senior Advisor to the Bridge Alliance, former CEO of the Congressional Management Foundation, and author of “Citizen’s Handbook for Influencing Elected Officials."


Read More

Protestors on one side of a caution tape line and people in mis-matching military gear on the other side.

Protesters clash with law enforcement after a federal agent shot and killed Alex Pretti on January 24, 2026 in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Arthur Maiorella/Anadolu/Getty Images

Single Mothers Lost Months of Income Hiding From Ice — and Now Can’t Afford To Renew Immigration Papers

It was a frigid January morning in Minneapolis. Alexa quietly stepped outside her apartment to heat her car for her baby, who was waiting inside in her crib.

They immediately spotted her.

Keep Reading Show less
Court’s Slaughter Decision Hands Presidents Sweeping New Authority

U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office at the White House on July 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Photo by Eric Lee/Getty Images)

Court’s Slaughter Decision Hands Presidents Sweeping New Authority

This series from Lawyers Defending American Democracy connects the words of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution to current events that threaten democracy and the justice system. Each piece highlights the unique responsibility lawyers carry—through their oath, professional obligations, and roles in their communities—to help the public understand what’s at risk and to speak out when democratic principles are under threat. LDAD’s call to action is straightforward: as the Founders once did, we must recognize threats to constitutional values, demand accountability, and act to defend them.

In its recent decision in Trump v. Slaughter, a divided Supreme Court approved an expansive use of presidential power that upsets the Constitutional balance between Congress and the President. The Court approved the President’s summary dismissal of agency leaders (in this case, commissioners of the Federal Trade Commission), notwithstanding a statute signed by a former President and the Court's own precedent specifically forbidding such dismissals. This decision will further politicize and weaponize much of our federal government.

Keep Reading Show less
Reclassifying Faith?: Inside the Department of War’s Revision to Its List of Religions
man holding his hands on open book
Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

Reclassifying Faith?: Inside the Department of War’s Revision to Its List of Religions

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

How Are Religions Recognized in the U.S. Military?

Keep Reading Show less
Anti-gerrymandering sign

Anti-gerrymandering sign

Bill Clark/Getty Images

Don't Hold Your Breath Waiting for Politicians or Their Consultants to Fix Gerrymandering

2018, a nonprofit worker in Michigan named Katie Fahey posted a message online asking if anyone else was tired of politicians drawing their own districts. She had no campaign experience and no political base.

Within two years, the ballot initiative she built, called Voters Not Politicians, had written an independent redistricting commission into the Michigan constitution. Hollywood eventually made a documentary about it, Slay the Dragon, which is a fairly accurate description of what she had actually done.

Keep Reading Show less