Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

AI Could Save Thousands—So Why Is Healthcare Still Hitting the Brakes?

Generative AI can cut medical errors and save lives — if leaders stop slowing its adoption.

Opinion

AI Could Save Thousands—So Why Is Healthcare Still Hitting the Brakes?

Discover how generative AI in healthcare could reduce misdiagnoses, improve chronic disease management, and save hundreds of thousands of lives—if policymakers accelerate adoption instead of waiting for risk-free perfection.

Getty Images / Pakorn Supajitsoontorn

Imagine that the only way Americans traveled was on foot or on horseback. And assume that 100,000 people died each year because they couldn’t reach a hospital in time or firefighters arrived too late.

Suddenly, they learned that thanks to a technological breakthrough, cars and trucks will become widely available within three years.


How would our nation’s leaders respond? I predict that elected officials and regulatory agencies would move quickly to build roads, accelerate automotive production, and help people learn to drive, rather than waiting for cars to become 100% risk-free. They’d recognize the nation’s death toll would drop significantly with faster transportation.

This is how American leaders should think about generative AI in medicine.

Medicine’s deadly status quo

Most Americans know healthcare is too expensive and difficult to access. Far fewer understand that hundreds of thousands of people die annually from misdiagnoses, poorly controlled chronic disease, and preventable medical errors. Fewer still can imagine how large language models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini would help prevent those deaths.

Today, diagnostic errors kill or permanently disable nearly 800,000 Americans each year. In addition, chronic diseases like hypertension and diabetes remain poorly controlled for millions of Americans, contributing to at least 50% of the nation’s heart attacks, strokes, and kidney failures each year. And nearly 60% of patients with a family doctor say they can’t get an appointment for weeks.

GenAI’s lifesaving trajectory

When the first generative AI tools reached the public in November 2022, the technology was deemed remarkable but unreliable, and far from safe in clinical settings. Google’s first medical AI model, Med-PaLM, achieved a mere 67% on the U.S. medical licensing exam later that year. Researchers, clinicians, and regulators quickly urged caution. But by March 2023, Med-PaLM 2 had scored 87%: expert doctor level.

Today’s models are even more impressive. A new Harvard-led study tested OpenAI’s o1 preview model on difficult clinical tasks, including 76 real emergency-room cases at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. At three stages of care (initial triage, first physician contact, and hospital admission), the model matched or exceeded the performance of experienced physicians.

Assuming large language models continue to double in power over the next three years, they will become 8 to 16 times more clinically capable than they are today. And yet, healthcare practitioners and leaders continue to view GenAI’s capabilities as limited to administrative tasks such as billing, coding, documentation, and ambient listening. Used to improve clinical outcomes, AI could help prevent hundreds of thousands of deaths each year.

Releasing the brakes

GenAI’s next set of lifesaving tools is already within reach. Existing models are being trained on ever-richer clinical information: real conversations between doctors and patients, millions of medical records, and streams of data from hospital monitors (97% of which goes unanalyzed because there is too much information for humans to process).

Given the toll of lives lost from today’s medical failures, the safest choice for our nation is to move our foot from the brake to the accelerator. Here are three examples where GenAI can help address today’s failures:

1. Chronic disease control

Conditions like hypertension, diabetes, and heart failure affect 75% of American adults and produce many of the nation’s deadliest complications, including heart attacks, strokes, and kidney failure.

Despite effective medications and evidence-based protocols, these diseases remain inadequately controlled. Two major reasons are medical structure and clinician time.

Across the country, chronic diseases are managed episodically, with office visits lasting 18 minutes on average, scheduled three or four months apart. Instead, patients need frequent monitoring to identify clinical trends and allow clinicians to adjust medication quickly when effective control isn’t happening.

A GenAI application connected to a home blood pressure cuff, glucose monitor, or wearable device could continuously track whether a patient’s condition was improving or worsening. Patients would continue their current plan, while doctors would be notified of problematic trends and able to make timely medication adjustments.

2. 24/7 medical guidance

When people develop symptoms at night or on weekends, they must decide whether to wait until the doctor’s office opens or go to an overcrowded emergency department.

Generative AI tools could help people select the best option by providing personalized guidance on the most likely diagnosis, the appropriate treatment, and whether to seek immediate medical care. Often, the problem resolves without additional medical assistance.

3. Ongoing clinical support

Most misdiagnoses and preventable medical errors happen not because clinicians lack knowledge, but because they lack the time to apply it.

During brief office visits, they are expected to evaluate new problems, manage chronic conditions, address preventive care, and comfort anxious patients. It’s not possible.

Technology companies are already building AI tools to reduce administrative burden. They are useful, but insufficient. GenAI could also provide immediate expertise to individuals with straightforward medical problems, freeing clinicians to spend more time with those patients at greatest risk.

The government’s role

To translate these opportunities into practice, the nation needs a coordinated public-private effort.

The federal government needs to ensure that all Americans, regardless of location or income, have access to the most reliable and robust large language models.

NIH researchers, medical societies, and clinicians will need to develop patient education materials that teach people how to prompt GenAI models and ask effective follow-up questions. They would also work with technology companies to ensure LLMs consistently provide reliable, evidence-based answers.

Finally, the FDA and CDC need to ensure that wearable and bedside monitors connect safely with GenAI applications on patients’ phones and computers.

If the United States wants to save the greatest number of lives, now is the time to expand access to GenAI tools, build safe and reliable technological applications for patients, and teach all Americans how to use GenAI to maximize.


Robert Pearl, the author of “ChatGPT, MD,” teaches at both the Stanford University School of Medicine and the Stanford Graduate School of Business. He is a former CEO of The Permanente Medical Group.


Read More

Back view of crop anonymous female talking to a chatbot of computer while sitting at home

AI chatbots and online therapy promise easier mental health care, but technology may be eroding the boundaries, privacy and human connection that make psychotherapy effective.

David Espejo/Getty Images

Big Tech’s Solutions to Mental Health Bring Bigger Problems

While America is suffering a mental health crisis, the good news is that tens of millions of people are getting help. In 2023, 60 million adults reported having sought counseling or treatment in the previous year, and the numbers continue to rise.

Psychotherapy works because of what’s known as the therapeutic frame, a set of boundaries that create safety and structure for patients and clinicians. Sessions last 50 minutes. Fees are agreed upon prior to the start of treatment. The therapist remains neutral, shares little of their personal life, and holds confidentiality sacred.

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Standard for Ethical Immigration Reporting
people holding flag of U.S.A miniature
Photo by Frank Kastle on Unsplash

A New Standard for Ethical Immigration Reporting

Seven months ago, I attended the first day of my Reporting on Race class at USC. Taught by journalist and immigration reporting expert Jean Guerrero, the course offered growth I hadn’t yet imagined, showing me how much I could evolve as a journalist in just one semester.

For the next five months, I researched and reported on an immigration story of my choosing. I wrote about how educators in Los Angeles protect and advocate for students and communities living in fear of ICE deportations. These educators organized community street patrols to keep their neighborhoods safe. Finding sources and producing the final draft took months, but it was one of the most rewarding experiences of my journalism studies so far.

Keep ReadingShow less
Artificial intelligence chip, AI processor, Backgrounds 3D rendered image.

AI is transforming finance, government, and society. As Congress considers new technology laws, the future of democratic oversight depends on wisdom, foresight, and political will.

ispyfriend/Getty Images

Can Congress Govern Disruptive Technology?

Imagine waking up one day to find your bank account frozen because an AI system has incorrectly identified you as a fraud risk. There is no human to call, only another algorithm reviewing your appeal. Hours later, the error is corrected, but the damage has already been done.

Who is actually in charge?

Keep ReadingShow less
The Case for Intergenerational AI Advocacy
The letters ai are displayed on a blurred background.
Photo by Zach M on Unsplash

The Case for Intergenerational AI Advocacy

If Allison Baker and Maria Garcia apply for the same job against Matthew Owens or Joe Alvarez, and Matthew or Joe gets the job despite everything else being the same, that would seem to be a typical case of gender discrimination by the employer.

However, the names and scenarios I described were not drawn from a human example, but from AI. ChatGPT generated female candidates who were, on average, 1.6 years younger than their male counterparts and considered them less qualified than male applicants. Given AI’s pervasiveness in hiring decisions, these biases pose a significant concern.

Keep ReadingShow less