Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

AI Could Save Thousands—So Why Is Healthcare Still Hitting the Brakes?

Generative AI can cut medical errors and save lives — if leaders stop slowing its adoption.

Opinion

AI Could Save Thousands—So Why Is Healthcare Still Hitting the Brakes?

Discover how generative AI in healthcare could reduce misdiagnoses, improve chronic disease management, and save hundreds of thousands of lives—if policymakers accelerate adoption instead of waiting for risk-free perfection.

Getty Images / Pakorn Supajitsoontorn

Imagine that the only way Americans traveled was on foot or on horseback. And assume that 100,000 people died each year because they couldn’t reach a hospital in time or firefighters arrived too late.

Suddenly, they learned that thanks to a technological breakthrough, cars and trucks will become widely available within three years.


How would our nation’s leaders respond? I predict that elected officials and regulatory agencies would move quickly to build roads, accelerate automotive production, and help people learn to drive, rather than waiting for cars to become 100% risk-free. They’d recognize the nation’s death toll would drop significantly with faster transportation.

This is how American leaders should think about generative AI in medicine.

Medicine’s deadly status quo

Most Americans know healthcare is too expensive and difficult to access. Far fewer understand that hundreds of thousands of people die annually from misdiagnoses, poorly controlled chronic disease, and preventable medical errors. Fewer still can imagine how large language models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini would help prevent those deaths.

Today, diagnostic errors kill or permanently disable nearly 800,000 Americans each year. In addition, chronic diseases like hypertension and diabetes remain poorly controlled for millions of Americans, contributing to at least 50% of the nation’s heart attacks, strokes, and kidney failures each year. And nearly 60% of patients with a family doctor say they can’t get an appointment for weeks.

GenAI’s lifesaving trajectory

When the first generative AI tools reached the public in November 2022, the technology was deemed remarkable but unreliable, and far from safe in clinical settings. Google’s first medical AI model, Med-PaLM, achieved a mere 67% on the U.S. medical licensing exam later that year. Researchers, clinicians, and regulators quickly urged caution. But by March 2023, Med-PaLM 2 had scored 87%: expert doctor level.

Today’s models are even more impressive. A new Harvard-led study tested OpenAI’s o1 preview model on difficult clinical tasks, including 76 real emergency-room cases at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. At three stages of care (initial triage, first physician contact, and hospital admission), the model matched or exceeded the performance of experienced physicians.

Assuming large language models continue to double in power over the next three years, they will become 8 to 16 times more clinically capable than they are today. And yet, healthcare practitioners and leaders continue to view GenAI’s capabilities as limited to administrative tasks such as billing, coding, documentation, and ambient listening. Used to improve clinical outcomes, AI could help prevent hundreds of thousands of deaths each year.

Releasing the brakes

GenAI’s next set of lifesaving tools is already within reach. Existing models are being trained on ever-richer clinical information: real conversations between doctors and patients, millions of medical records, and streams of data from hospital monitors (97% of which goes unanalyzed because there is too much information for humans to process).

Given the toll of lives lost from today’s medical failures, the safest choice for our nation is to move our foot from the brake to the accelerator. Here are three examples where GenAI can help address today’s failures:

1. Chronic disease control

Conditions like hypertension, diabetes, and heart failure affect 75% of American adults and produce many of the nation’s deadliest complications, including heart attacks, strokes, and kidney failure.

Despite effective medications and evidence-based protocols, these diseases remain inadequately controlled. Two major reasons are medical structure and clinician time.

Across the country, chronic diseases are managed episodically, with office visits lasting 18 minutes on average, scheduled three or four months apart. Instead, patients need frequent monitoring to identify clinical trends and allow clinicians to adjust medication quickly when effective control isn’t happening.

A GenAI application connected to a home blood pressure cuff, glucose monitor, or wearable device could continuously track whether a patient’s condition was improving or worsening. Patients would continue their current plan, while doctors would be notified of problematic trends and able to make timely medication adjustments.

2. 24/7 medical guidance

When people develop symptoms at night or on weekends, they must decide whether to wait until the doctor’s office opens or go to an overcrowded emergency department.

Generative AI tools could help people select the best option by providing personalized guidance on the most likely diagnosis, the appropriate treatment, and whether to seek immediate medical care. Often, the problem resolves without additional medical assistance.

3. Ongoing clinical support

Most misdiagnoses and preventable medical errors happen not because clinicians lack knowledge, but because they lack the time to apply it.

During brief office visits, they are expected to evaluate new problems, manage chronic conditions, address preventive care, and comfort anxious patients. It’s not possible.

Technology companies are already building AI tools to reduce administrative burden. They are useful, but insufficient. GenAI could also provide immediate expertise to individuals with straightforward medical problems, freeing clinicians to spend more time with those patients at greatest risk.

The government’s role

To translate these opportunities into practice, the nation needs a coordinated public-private effort.

The federal government needs to ensure that all Americans, regardless of location or income, have access to the most reliable and robust large language models.

NIH researchers, medical societies, and clinicians will need to develop patient education materials that teach people how to prompt GenAI models and ask effective follow-up questions. They would also work with technology companies to ensure LLMs consistently provide reliable, evidence-based answers.

Finally, the FDA and CDC need to ensure that wearable and bedside monitors connect safely with GenAI applications on patients’ phones and computers.

If the United States wants to save the greatest number of lives, now is the time to expand access to GenAI tools, build safe and reliable technological applications for patients, and teach all Americans how to use GenAI to maximize.


Robert Pearl, the author of “ChatGPT, MD,” teaches at both the Stanford University School of Medicine and the Stanford Graduate School of Business. He is a former CEO of The Permanente Medical Group.


Read More

This 3D rendered image shows a central AI processing chip sitting atop a glowing blue printed circuit board.

Can AI profit-sharing help workers? Examining public wealth funds, AI taxes, economic transition policies, and the future of work.

Jason marz / Getty Images

There’s No Easy Path Through the AI Transition

“Trending” policy ideas tend to garner attention for all the wrong reasons: they seem like silver bullet solutions that will save us from taking on much harder reforms. Proposals to share profits from leading AI companies with the public are the latest example. It’s the rare policy scheme that seems to have united President Donald Trump, Senator Bernie Sanders, and CEOs at the leading AI labs. While the proposals for AI profit sharing vary in their precise details, a quick review of their likely outcomes should quickly deflate the popular excitement that has formed in response to calls for new taxes, public wealth funds, and the like. It’s important to reveal such limitations so that the AI policy discourse can move on to mechanisms more likely to address the real concerns of the American people.

In our first hypothetical world, the two leading AI labs—Anthropic and OpenAI—give away 3% of their equity. That’s not nothing! Based on current figures, such a contribution could kickstart a public wealth fund of about $55 billion. Let’s then imagine that fund earns 10% a year (a big “if” but let’s run with it). Per The Economist, this AI would reach a staggering $140 billion within ten years. How much would that benefit Americans? If annual payouts were 4% — what the publication reports is a proper amount to keep the fund going and growing — Americans would have an extra $20 in their pocket.

Keep Reading Show less
For Imre Huss, Fixing Democracy Starts With Talking to a Stranger
a couple of people sitting at a table with cups of coffee

For Imre Huss, Fixing Democracy Starts With Talking to a Stranger

The Democracy Architects Council, presented by The Bridge Alliance Education Fund and Civics Unplugged, offers a paid, one-year fellowship for eight fellows ages 18 to 28, each selected for their work across a distinct sector of democratic life.

The youngest member of the Democracy Architects Council is building AI-powered civic tech, but he says the real work of democracy still happens face to face.

Keep Reading Show less
Vote Badge with Rising Social Media Like Icons and Hearts – Digital Engagement and Online Voting
J Studios / Getty Images

Democratic Autopsy and AI

After every defeat, organizations conduct autopsies. The good ones are honest, like NASA’s Rogers Commission report after the Space Shuttle Challenger exploded shortly after takeoff. In addition to identifying the infamous O-rings as the proximal culprit, it looked at organizational culture, communication failures, normalization of risk, management pressures, and institutional blind spots. The best ones are uncomfortable, and make a serious effort to understand “why did we mess this up so badly?” I’ve personally seen both good “autopsies” and bad ones throughout my decades of experience in true life-or-death realms: the SEAL Teams and as an Emergency Medicine physician.

Following the 2024 election, the Democratic National Committee produced a lengthy report titled Build to Win. Build to Last. Yet it is not a serious document because it does nothing to prepare for the unstoppable and very near future staring us right in the face. It is nearly 200 pages long and attempts to explain what went wrong and how the party should prepare for the future. It discusses organizing, communications, coalition building, fundraising, digital strategy, and voter outreach. It is filled with references to data, analytics, and technology.

Keep Reading Show less
My Generation Can Spot the Deepfake. That’s Not Enough.
Smartphone with ai text in jeans pocket
Photo by Immo Wegmann on Unsplash

My Generation Can Spot the Deepfake. That’s Not Enough.

Thomas Massie, a seven-term Republican congressman from Kentucky, lost his primary on May 19. The race cost $32.6 million, making it the most expensive congressional primary in U.S. history. Among the weapons deployed against him: an AI-generated video showing him checking into a hotel room with Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar, with their hands clasped. The narrator called it "worse than adultery." A disclaimer at the bottom of the screen, in small text, read: "This satirical ad was created with artificial intelligence."

I watched the ad. It looks ridiculous. The movements are slightly too smooth, the lighting is off, and the scenario is so cartoonish that I genuinely could not tell at first whether it was meant to be taken seriously. But I'm 17, and I've spent the last four years watching AI-generated content get better in real time. I know what the seams look like. Massie, in his post-loss interview on Meet the Press, was blunt about who the ad actually reached: "It was actually very effective on the boomers."

Keep Reading Show less