Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

AI Could Save Thousands—So Why Is Healthcare Still Hitting the Brakes?

Generative AI can cut medical errors and save lives — if leaders stop slowing its adoption.

Opinion

AI Could Save Thousands—So Why Is Healthcare Still Hitting the Brakes?

Discover how generative AI in healthcare could reduce misdiagnoses, improve chronic disease management, and save hundreds of thousands of lives—if policymakers accelerate adoption instead of waiting for risk-free perfection.

Getty Images / Pakorn Supajitsoontorn

Imagine that the only way Americans traveled was on foot or on horseback. And assume that 100,000 people died each year because they couldn’t reach a hospital in time or firefighters arrived too late.

Suddenly, they learned that thanks to a technological breakthrough, cars and trucks will become widely available within three years.


How would our nation’s leaders respond? I predict that elected officials and regulatory agencies would move quickly to build roads, accelerate automotive production, and help people learn to drive, rather than waiting for cars to become 100% risk-free. They’d recognize the nation’s death toll would drop significantly with faster transportation.

This is how American leaders should think about generative AI in medicine.

Medicine’s deadly status quo

Most Americans know healthcare is too expensive and difficult to access. Far fewer understand that hundreds of thousands of people die annually from misdiagnoses, poorly controlled chronic disease, and preventable medical errors. Fewer still can imagine how large language models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini would help prevent those deaths.

Today, diagnostic errors kill or permanently disable nearly 800,000 Americans each year. In addition, chronic diseases like hypertension and diabetes remain poorly controlled for millions of Americans, contributing to at least 50% of the nation’s heart attacks, strokes, and kidney failures each year. And nearly 60% of patients with a family doctor say they can’t get an appointment for weeks.

GenAI’s lifesaving trajectory

When the first generative AI tools reached the public in November 2022, the technology was deemed remarkable but unreliable, and far from safe in clinical settings. Google’s first medical AI model, Med-PaLM, achieved a mere 67% on the U.S. medical licensing exam later that year. Researchers, clinicians, and regulators quickly urged caution. But by March 2023, Med-PaLM 2 had scored 87%: expert doctor level.

Today’s models are even more impressive. A new Harvard-led study tested OpenAI’s o1 preview model on difficult clinical tasks, including 76 real emergency-room cases at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. At three stages of care (initial triage, first physician contact, and hospital admission), the model matched or exceeded the performance of experienced physicians.

Assuming large language models continue to double in power over the next three years, they will become 8 to 16 times more clinically capable than they are today. And yet, healthcare practitioners and leaders continue to view GenAI’s capabilities as limited to administrative tasks such as billing, coding, documentation, and ambient listening. Used to improve clinical outcomes, AI could help prevent hundreds of thousands of deaths each year.

Releasing the brakes

GenAI’s next set of lifesaving tools is already within reach. Existing models are being trained on ever-richer clinical information: real conversations between doctors and patients, millions of medical records, and streams of data from hospital monitors (97% of which goes unanalyzed because there is too much information for humans to process).

Given the toll of lives lost from today’s medical failures, the safest choice for our nation is to move our foot from the brake to the accelerator. Here are three examples where GenAI can help address today’s failures:

1. Chronic disease control

Conditions like hypertension, diabetes, and heart failure affect 75% of American adults and produce many of the nation’s deadliest complications, including heart attacks, strokes, and kidney failure.

Despite effective medications and evidence-based protocols, these diseases remain inadequately controlled. Two major reasons are medical structure and clinician time.

Across the country, chronic diseases are managed episodically, with office visits lasting 18 minutes on average, scheduled three or four months apart. Instead, patients need frequent monitoring to identify clinical trends and allow clinicians to adjust medication quickly when effective control isn’t happening.

A GenAI application connected to a home blood pressure cuff, glucose monitor, or wearable device could continuously track whether a patient’s condition was improving or worsening. Patients would continue their current plan, while doctors would be notified of problematic trends and able to make timely medication adjustments.

2. 24/7 medical guidance

When people develop symptoms at night or on weekends, they must decide whether to wait until the doctor’s office opens or go to an overcrowded emergency department.

Generative AI tools could help people select the best option by providing personalized guidance on the most likely diagnosis, the appropriate treatment, and whether to seek immediate medical care. Often, the problem resolves without additional medical assistance.

3. Ongoing clinical support

Most misdiagnoses and preventable medical errors happen not because clinicians lack knowledge, but because they lack the time to apply it.

During brief office visits, they are expected to evaluate new problems, manage chronic conditions, address preventive care, and comfort anxious patients. It’s not possible.

Technology companies are already building AI tools to reduce administrative burden. They are useful, but insufficient. GenAI could also provide immediate expertise to individuals with straightforward medical problems, freeing clinicians to spend more time with those patients at greatest risk.

The government’s role

To translate these opportunities into practice, the nation needs a coordinated public-private effort.

The federal government needs to ensure that all Americans, regardless of location or income, have access to the most reliable and robust large language models.

NIH researchers, medical societies, and clinicians will need to develop patient education materials that teach people how to prompt GenAI models and ask effective follow-up questions. They would also work with technology companies to ensure LLMs consistently provide reliable, evidence-based answers.

Finally, the FDA and CDC need to ensure that wearable and bedside monitors connect safely with GenAI applications on patients’ phones and computers.

If the United States wants to save the greatest number of lives, now is the time to expand access to GenAI tools, build safe and reliable technological applications for patients, and teach all Americans how to use GenAI to maximize.


Robert Pearl, the author of “ChatGPT, MD,” teaches at both the Stanford University School of Medicine and the Stanford Graduate School of Business. He is a former CEO of The Permanente Medical Group.


Read More

Digital illustration of robot's hand holding and supporting man who is working on his desk using computer, represent themes of artificial intelligence (AI), the future of work, and the intersection of humanity and technology.

Universal basic income would cost trillions. Wage insurance, a bigger child tax credit, and a tax break for work could help workers left behind by AI at a fraction of the price.

Andriy Onufriyenko / Getty Images

AI’s Costs: The Human Element & the Response

The age of AI will be a revolutionary age. In medicine, engineering, and more, there is the possibility of great benefit to humanity. Consider some Wall Street Journal headlines: “The Quest to Use AI to Help Find New Drugs,” and “Fusion Startup Gets an AI Boost.” Already, AI is a substantial portion of GDP growth.

Yet a rising tide will not lift the boats with holes in their hulls, as Jack Kemp once said. Artificial intelligence is challenging our leaders to think about those possibly left behind. Within the AI community itself, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei expresses concern that we could see 5-10% GDP growth with 10% unemployment.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a block with the words, "AI," on it, surrounded by slightly smaller caution signs.

Efficient AI may not mean less energy. The Jevons paradox shows why demand can grow, and why no one can say yet where AI’s real limits will be.

Getty Images, J Studios

The People Selling You the Future Don’t Know It Either

Artificial Intelligence is everywhere and can no longer be avoided. Will there ever be a ceiling for the expansion of this technology? AI companies are not just selling software. The story about the inevitability that AI will have in transforming work, education, medicine, art, government, and daily life is much more profitable. People must accept the transformation or be left behind. They are selling behind a mask of certainty.

The court of public opinion on AI has concluded that this technology is too energy-consuming for the benefits it allegedly brings and the ways many people use it. Therefore, companies have shifted their agendas to presenting efficiency as a solution to the technology’s enormous need for power. Smaller, better models and chips, and more efficient data centers may reduce the energy required for a single text-based request or generated image. If those improvements make AI cheaper to use, it will be invited into more daily life right?

Keep ReadingShow less
AI chip
a computer chip with the letter a on top of it
Photo by Igor Omilaev on Unsplash

We Should Regulate AI to Make It Grow Faster

The debate over artificial intelligence has become divided between two powerful ideas: that we need a “moratorium” to slow AI until we can make it safe, and that regulating AI will slow the innovation we need for our economy and national security. Both concerns are legitimate. But “moratorium” and “slowing AI growth” are divisive terms: they reassure those concerned about AI's safety, economic and environmental consequences while alarming those who see AI competition and national security as urgent priorities. We need a different starting point—meaningful regulation that provides the safeguards necessary to protect people, communities and the environment while creating the conditions for AI to continue growing. The experiences of Europe and China challenge the assumption that regulation must slow AI.

China has combined increasingly detailed, technology-specific AI regulation with substantial government support for AI development. Recent studies provide evidence that this approach can promote innovation. One 2026 study of Chinese companies from 2017 through 2023 found that the creation of national AI innovation and development pilot zones significantly increased corporate digital transformation, in part through increased research and development, human capital and reduced transition costs. Another 2026 study, covering Chinese manufacturing companies from 2014 through 2024, found that the same policy significantly promoted the adoption of intelligent technologies.

Keep ReadingShow less
person reading a computer screen
man using computer inside room

Student-Led AI Initiative Aims to Tackle Misinformation

PRINCETON JUNCTION, NJ — As generative artificial intelligence reshapes the digital landscape, a New Jersey student researcher is using the technology to combat media bias. Shaurya Jindal, an AI researcher and student at West Windsor-Plainsboro High School South, has launched Cogito News, an educational platform designed to build modern media literacy skills.

Cogito News was founded in response to growing concerns about partisan framing and selective sourcing in contemporary journalism. Recognizing that cognitive biases often influence how news is packaged and consumed, Jindal sought to build a tool that helps users critically evaluate the information they encounter daily. The platform's real-world impact and timely relevance were highlighted when Jindal was my guest on The Fulcrum Democracy Forum, an interview series dedicated to civic renewal and examining innovative approaches to strengthening democratic systems.

Keep ReadingShow less