Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

AI Could Save Thousands—So Why Is Healthcare Still Hitting the Brakes?

Generative AI can cut medical errors and save lives — if leaders stop slowing its adoption.

Opinion

AI Could Save Thousands—So Why Is Healthcare Still Hitting the Brakes?

Discover how generative AI in healthcare could reduce misdiagnoses, improve chronic disease management, and save hundreds of thousands of lives—if policymakers accelerate adoption instead of waiting for risk-free perfection.

Getty Images / Pakorn Supajitsoontorn

Imagine that the only way Americans traveled was on foot or on horseback. And assume that 100,000 people died each year because they couldn’t reach a hospital in time or firefighters arrived too late.

Suddenly, they learned that thanks to a technological breakthrough, cars and trucks will become widely available within three years.


How would our nation’s leaders respond? I predict that elected officials and regulatory agencies would move quickly to build roads, accelerate automotive production, and help people learn to drive, rather than waiting for cars to become 100% risk-free. They’d recognize the nation’s death toll would drop significantly with faster transportation.

This is how American leaders should think about generative AI in medicine.

Medicine’s deadly status quo

Most Americans know healthcare is too expensive and difficult to access. Far fewer understand that hundreds of thousands of people die annually from misdiagnoses, poorly controlled chronic disease, and preventable medical errors. Fewer still can imagine how large language models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini would help prevent those deaths.

Today, diagnostic errors kill or permanently disable nearly 800,000 Americans each year. In addition, chronic diseases like hypertension and diabetes remain poorly controlled for millions of Americans, contributing to at least 50% of the nation’s heart attacks, strokes, and kidney failures each year. And nearly 60% of patients with a family doctor say they can’t get an appointment for weeks.

GenAI’s lifesaving trajectory

When the first generative AI tools reached the public in November 2022, the technology was deemed remarkable but unreliable, and far from safe in clinical settings. Google’s first medical AI model, Med-PaLM, achieved a mere 67% on the U.S. medical licensing exam later that year. Researchers, clinicians, and regulators quickly urged caution. But by March 2023, Med-PaLM 2 had scored 87%: expert doctor level.

Today’s models are even more impressive. A new Harvard-led study tested OpenAI’s o1 preview model on difficult clinical tasks, including 76 real emergency-room cases at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. At three stages of care (initial triage, first physician contact, and hospital admission), the model matched or exceeded the performance of experienced physicians.

Assuming large language models continue to double in power over the next three years, they will become 8 to 16 times more clinically capable than they are today. And yet, healthcare practitioners and leaders continue to view GenAI’s capabilities as limited to administrative tasks such as billing, coding, documentation, and ambient listening. Used to improve clinical outcomes, AI could help prevent hundreds of thousands of deaths each year.

Releasing the brakes

GenAI’s next set of lifesaving tools is already within reach. Existing models are being trained on ever-richer clinical information: real conversations between doctors and patients, millions of medical records, and streams of data from hospital monitors (97% of which goes unanalyzed because there is too much information for humans to process).

Given the toll of lives lost from today’s medical failures, the safest choice for our nation is to move our foot from the brake to the accelerator. Here are three examples where GenAI can help address today’s failures:

1. Chronic disease control

Conditions like hypertension, diabetes, and heart failure affect 75% of American adults and produce many of the nation’s deadliest complications, including heart attacks, strokes, and kidney failure.

Despite effective medications and evidence-based protocols, these diseases remain inadequately controlled. Two major reasons are medical structure and clinician time.

Across the country, chronic diseases are managed episodically, with office visits lasting 18 minutes on average, scheduled three or four months apart. Instead, patients need frequent monitoring to identify clinical trends and allow clinicians to adjust medication quickly when effective control isn’t happening.

A GenAI application connected to a home blood pressure cuff, glucose monitor, or wearable device could continuously track whether a patient’s condition was improving or worsening. Patients would continue their current plan, while doctors would be notified of problematic trends and able to make timely medication adjustments.

2. 24/7 medical guidance

When people develop symptoms at night or on weekends, they must decide whether to wait until the doctor’s office opens or go to an overcrowded emergency department.

Generative AI tools could help people select the best option by providing personalized guidance on the most likely diagnosis, the appropriate treatment, and whether to seek immediate medical care. Often, the problem resolves without additional medical assistance.

3. Ongoing clinical support

Most misdiagnoses and preventable medical errors happen not because clinicians lack knowledge, but because they lack the time to apply it.

During brief office visits, they are expected to evaluate new problems, manage chronic conditions, address preventive care, and comfort anxious patients. It’s not possible.

Technology companies are already building AI tools to reduce administrative burden. They are useful, but insufficient. GenAI could also provide immediate expertise to individuals with straightforward medical problems, freeing clinicians to spend more time with those patients at greatest risk.

The government’s role

To translate these opportunities into practice, the nation needs a coordinated public-private effort.

The federal government needs to ensure that all Americans, regardless of location or income, have access to the most reliable and robust large language models.

NIH researchers, medical societies, and clinicians will need to develop patient education materials that teach people how to prompt GenAI models and ask effective follow-up questions. They would also work with technology companies to ensure LLMs consistently provide reliable, evidence-based answers.

Finally, the FDA and CDC need to ensure that wearable and bedside monitors connect safely with GenAI applications on patients’ phones and computers.

If the United States wants to save the greatest number of lives, now is the time to expand access to GenAI tools, build safe and reliable technological applications for patients, and teach all Americans how to use GenAI to maximize.


Robert Pearl, the author of “ChatGPT, MD,” teaches at both the Stanford University School of Medicine and the Stanford Graduate School of Business. He is a former CEO of The Permanente Medical Group.


Read More

America's New and Dangerous Gilded Age

A NASA logo is displayed at the entrance to the Mary W. Jackson NASA Headquarters building on May 30, 2026, in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

America's New and Dangerous Gilded Age

As part of a collaboration between The Fulcrum's NextGen initiative and Made By Us, The Fulcrum is publishing Letters to America, a series created through the Youth250 project that invites Gen Z to reflect on the nation’s past, present, and future as the United States approaches its 250th anniversary.

On June 4, 1876, on the eve of our Nation’s centennial, the Transcontinental Express completed its inaugural voyage across America’s newly constructed coast-to-coast railroad, traveling from the Atlantic to the Pacific in just 83 hours. This milestone marked the end of the Railroad Race and the beginning of the Gilded Age, epitomized by its rail barons and drastic wealth disparity.

Keep ReadingShow less
ICE agents wearing gear that reads, "POLICE ICE." Their faces are covered, they are wearing helmets, and one of them is holding a weapon.

ICE agents stand guard in front of protesters outside the federal immigration center at Delaney Hall in Newark, where ICE is housing detained immigrants on May 26, 2026 in Newark, New Jersey.

Spencer Platt / Getty Images

Your Face Is in a Federal Database and ICE Put It There

Last week, while the world watched JD Vance fly to Switzerland to negotiate an Iran deal, a quieter document surfaced from inside the Department of Homeland Security that may matter more to the daily lives of Americans than anything that happened at Lake Lucerne. A DHS Privacy Threshold Analysis, obtained and reported by NPR, outlines plans to give approximately 1,300 local police forces access to the same facial recognition technology that federal ICE agents currently use in the field. The app is called the ICE Task Force Module. It allows an officer to photograph any person they stop, run the image against federal databases, and receive an identity match in seconds. Every photograph taken is stored in a DHS system for fifteen years. The document states plainly that this surveillance will sweep up American citizens. The DHS knows this. It is proceeding anyway.

This is not an immigration story. It is a surveillance infrastructure story, and the distinction is the most important thing to understand about what is being built.

Keep ReadingShow less
America’s Data Crisis: Restoring Trust in the Facts That Unite Us
a close up of a window with a building in the background

America’s Data Crisis: Restoring Trust in the Facts That Unite Us

At a moment when Americans can’t even agree on the basic facts that mold our public life, the nation faces a deeper crisis than polarization alone. We are living through a collapse of shared reality. When people lose confidence in the numbers, surveys, and official information that once anchored civic debate, democracy itself begins to drift. Trustworthy government data isn’t a technical issue — it is core infrastructure that holds a self‑governing society together. And right now, that infrastructure is under strain.

The public has lost trust in government information on many levels and across the political spectrum. To restore that trust, we need to address the challenges facing government data — including low survey response rates, data protection concerns, and outdated or flawed statistical methods.

Keep ReadingShow less
Keeping Kids Safe Online?: Understanding the Debate Over AI Age Verification
boy in gray shirt using black laptop computer
Photo by Thomas Park on Unsplash

Keeping Kids Safe Online?: Understanding the Debate Over AI Age Verification

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

Keep ReadingShow less