Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Nevada moves to send mail ballots to all; Trump threatens to sue to stop that

Welcome to Nevada sign

The vote-by-mail bill also expands ballot harvesting, which proponents say is critical to boosting turnout in Nevada's poor, rural communities.

Tony Emmett/Getty Images

President Trump on Monday threatened to sue to stop Nevada from delivering absentee ballots to all active voters, just hours after the Legislature voted to conduct the state's presidential election mainly by mail because of the coronavirus.

Solidly blue California and Vermont have made similar decisions this summer, joining five states that were going to be almost wholly vote-by-mail before the pandemic.

Nevada becomes the first somewhat purple place on the roster, however, and the president asserted without evidence the switch will make it impossible for him to carry its six electoral votes. It was the latest of at least six dozen statements he's made seeking to rattle confidence in the democratic process by asserting mailed ballots will magnify fraud and minimize GOP electoral strength.


"In an illegal late night coup, Nevada's clubhouse Governor made it impossible for Republicans to win the state," Trump declared on Twitter. "Post Office could never handle the Traffic of Mail-In Votes without preparation. Using Covid to steal the state. See you in Court!"

Gov. Steve Sisolak is planning to sign the measure, which his fellow Democrats in Carson City pushed through over the weekend on back-to-back party-line votes. Sunday's Senate vote clearing he bill was 13-8.

Trump offered no hint about his legal argument for blocking the impending law, and so far this year the federal courts — including a steady stream of rulings from the Supreme Court — have largely left it to the states to decide election regulations for themselves.

Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske, the only Republican statewide elected official, told lawmakers Friday that she was not aware of any fraud in the June primary, the first time the state mailed all active voters absentee ballots.

Although just 2 percent of votes were cast in person, the main complaint was about lines as long as eight hours because only a handful of polling places were open in Las Vegas and Reno, where seven of eight Nevadans live. Just 19 were open statewide. The new legislation will mandate 140 polling stations on Nov. 3, almost as many as two years ago.

Cegavske nonetheless opposed the bill, which she said was written without her input, mainly because it has a provision broadly expanding permission for the collection and return of absentee envelopes by non-family members including political operatives. Republicans say this "ballot harvesting" can also incubate election theft. Voting rights groups say it helps turnout in poorer rural communities, especially on Native American reservations.

The bill provides $3 million to proactively distribute mail ballots. But Cegavske said that was not enough to cover the expense for equipment, education, printing and postage for delivering 1.6 million of them — and provided nothing to counties for opening and tabulating them.

That problem would be solved if the next economic recovery package from Congress includes more money to help states conduct their elections, but negotiations on the package are at an impasse.

Nevada got 1 percent of the $400 million in election grants Congress approved this spring and used that money mainly on the primary, though some equipment purchased for that election can be used again.

Just 9 percent of Nevada votes were cast by mail two years ago, so the president is on to something in suggesting the challenges — to get ready in three months for that number to multiply perhaps tenfold — are daunting.

Since the pandemic took hold and the county started looking to on rely mail ballots as never before, Trump has asserted that the system "doesn't work out well for Republicans." But his party's operatives have been embracing it for decades, and a recent study concluded it does not benefit one party over another.

And experts say there is no evidence of meaningful election fraud associated with mail-in voting.

Election officials and voting rights groups also universally contradict Trump's claim that there's a meaningful difference between absentee ballots, which he approves of and has used several times himself, and vote-by-mail ballots. The two are synonymous because they are processed the same way.

Monday's tweet comes a month after the Trump campaign sued to stop officials in battleground Pennsylvania from relaxing some of their vote-by-mail rules. The national GOP is fighting lawsuits over voting rules in at least 18 other states.

And last week he floated the idea of delaying the election – which he has no authority to do — as the best way to counter the rise of mail voting. The suggestion was met with unusually clear and quick rejection from Republicans.

Four years ago Hillary Clinton won Nevada by 3 points, or 27,000 votes — the third straight Democrat to do so as the state's Latino and suburban white-collar populations expand. But the Trump campaign had been talking of spending there this fall, along with just two other states that he lost narrowly but asserted he was in position to flip this time: Minnesota and New Hampshire.


Read More

U.S. Capitol.
As government shutdowns drag on, a novel idea emerges: use arbitration to break congressional gridlock and fix America’s broken budget process.
Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

Congress's productive 2025 (And don't let anyone tell you otherwise)

The media loves to tell you your government isn't working, even when it is. Don't let anyone tell you 2025 was an unproductive year for Congress. [Edit: To clarify, I don't mean the government is working for you.]

1,976 pages of new law

At 1,976 pages of new law enacted since President Trump took office, including an increase of the national debt limit by $4 trillion, any journalist telling you not much happened in Congress this year is sleeping on the job.

Keep ReadingShow less
Someone using an AI chatbot on their phone.

AI-powered wellness tools promise care at work, but raise serious questions about consent, surveillance, and employee autonomy.

Getty Images, d3sign

Why Workplace Wellbeing AI Needs a New Ethics of Consent

Across the U.S. and globally, employers—including corporations, healthcare systems, universities, and nonprofits—are increasing investment in worker well-being. The global corporate wellness market reached $53.5 billion in sales in 2024, with North America leading adoption. Corporate wellness programs now use AI to monitor stress, track burnout risk, or recommend personalized interventions.

Vendors offering AI-enabled well-being platforms, chatbots, and stress-tracking tools are rapidly expanding. Chatbots such as Woebot and Wysa are increasingly integrated into workplace wellness programs.

Keep ReadingShow less
Women holding signs to defend diversity at Havard

Harvard students joined in a rally protesting the Supreme Courts ruling against affirmative action in 2023.

Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images

Diversity Has Become a Dirty Word. It Doesn’t Have to Be.

I have an identical twin sister. Although our faces can unlock each other’s iPhones, even the two of us are not exactly the same. If identical twins can differ, wouldn’t most people be different too? Why is diversity considered a bad word?

Like me, my twin sister is in computing, yet we are unique in many ways. She works in industry, while I am in academia. She’s allergic to guinea pigs, while I had pet guinea pigs (yep, that’s how she found out). Even our voices aren’t the same. As a kid, I was definitely the chattier one, while she loved taking walks together in silence (which, of course, drove me crazy).

Keep ReadingShow less
The Domestic Sting: Why the Tariff Bill is Arriving at the American Door
photo of dollar coins and banknotes
Photo by Mathieu Turle on Unsplash

The Domestic Sting: Why the Tariff Bill is Arriving at the American Door

America's tariff experiment, now nearly a year old, is proving more painful than its architects anticipated. What began as a bold stroke to shield domestic industries and force concessions from trading partners has instead delivered a slow-burning rise in prices, complicating the Federal Reserve's battle against inflation. As the policy grinds on, economists warn that the real damage lies ahead, with consumers and businesses absorbing costs that erode purchasing power and economic momentum. This is not the quick victory promised but a protracted burden that risks entrenching higher prices just as the economy seeks stability.

The tariffs, rolled out in phases since early March 2025, have jacked up the average import duty from 2 percent to around 17 percent. Imported goods prices have climbed 4 percent since then, outpacing the 2 percent rise in domestic equivalents. Items like coffee, which the United States cannot produce at scale, have seen the sharpest hikes, alongside products from heavily penalized countries such as China. Retailers and importers, far from passing all costs abroad as hoped, have shouldered much of the load initially, limiting immediate sticker shock. Yet daily pricing data from major chains reveal a creeping pass-through: imported goods up 5 percent overall, domestic up 2.5 percent. Cautious sellers absorb some hit to avoid losing market share, but this restraint is fading as tariffs are embedded in supply chains.

Keep ReadingShow less