Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Canceled and Silenced: From Instagram Ban to Fears of Censorship

Canceled and Silenced: From Instagram Ban to Fears of Censorship

A civil rights attorney reflects on being banned from Instagram, rising censorship, and her parents’ escape from Cuba—drawing chilling parallels between past authoritarian regimes and growing threats to free speech in America.

Getty Images, filo

I have often discussed my parents' fleeing Cuba, in part, for free speech.

The Washington Post just purged one third of their team, including reporters who are stationed in Ukraine and the middle east, reporting on critical international affairs.


A Washington Post reporter's home was raided by the FBI.

Don Lemon, a former CNN anchor, was arrested.

Instagram banned me - twice.

I became a feminist in the 90s (I was probably one sooner, but didn’t know the meaning). I was an immediate fan of Ms. Magazine, specifically the principle that the magazine had no advertisements because of the sexism, expectations, and pressure that women feel by looking at unrealistic images of models.

I immediately subscribed to the notion to try to do everything I can to stay away from advertising and from propaganda.

For the same reason I love Ms. Magazine; I hate social media. It is not real. It creates a semblance of perfection or pressure to keep up with standards that are not accurate or possible. It allows bullying. It causes depression in teens. It violates privacy and sells your data. The list goes on.

But social media can feel like a necessary evil. Most places I go, people connect over their Instagram accounts. Businesses advertise, and social action is taken on social media.

I created an Instagram account using my business email, hoping to highlight the work of my organization and to stay apprised of things that were happening for survivors across the country. A couple of weeks into having an account, never having posted, using a professional headshot and my professional email - I was banned.

I had to prove that I was real. I had to upload a picture of my driver’s license. I had to upload a copy of my passport. And when that still wasn’t enough, I had to record an image of me looking at the camera and looking to the left, to the right, up, and down. I remained banned. Silenced.

I went to an event later that week where a CEO of a migrant farm worker immigrant rights group told me that her account was banned. I felt like there was a connection there and wondered if we were being monitored and targeted.

I filed an appeal. Nothing. I emailed Instagram. Nothing. I ChatGPT’d “how do I file an appeal with Instagram.” Nothing.

My friend said, "What did you do?” Nothing--except follow groups pursuing survivors and social justice.

A few months later, I thought I would attempt again. I was feeling disconnected from not having access to Instagram. Using an email I had previously used for a now deactivated Facebook account, I created a new Instagram account.

I started following the protests of the national strike for January 30, and that same day, January 30, 2026, I got banned. I again uploaded a video of me turning my head to the left, to the right, up and down. I uploaded my driver’s license and my passport, and I was told I had violated community standards - permanently banned, again.

Silenced. I have never posted one thing. I once reposted something from my organization. I think my account lasted about a week.

Now I wonder: do I have free speech? I am not sure if I was banned because I lead a nonprofit, but outspoken leaders across the country are being silenced. Reporters are being arrested and attacked. Legal observers have been assassinated. First responders were assassinated. Nonprofit leaders silenced.

I can’t help but see a pattern.

My job as a lawyer is to advise people of their rights. We are proud at Survivor Justice Center to give “voice and choice.” We do not tell our clients what to do, but provide them with their legal options. This is a core tenent of being an attorney and a guiding principle to my beliefs.

As an attorney, I must give this advice: it is imperative we continue to speak out and exercise our right to free speech. We must not be complicit. We must continue to fight for those rights of others, even when our voices are silenced.

However, for the first time, I feel afraid to be on the streets exercising this right. I have asked my board for a plan if I am arrested. Was banning me on Instagram only the start? Am I now a target due to my job, my beliefs, or the fact that I’m a daughter of immigrants?

I encourage my staff to speak out against injustice; when my friends express hesitancy at attending rallies or gatherings, I remind them of their rights and encourage them to utilize them. But the recent silencing of critics has made me doubt my own advice. Should I encourage people to use their voice when I know the potential consequences?

My parents fled a communist dictatorship where their rights to free speech were stripped. I have a staff member who was born into a regime with a dictator in Chile; she recently remarked that what we are facing now feels like what she experienced and what her family fled.

The stories of my parents' escape from Cuba linger in my head; I’m reminded of their struggles when I see news of people being punished just for standing up for what they believe in. Even now, journalists in Cuba face harsh penalties for sharing the truth, often dismissed as “fake news” (sound familiar?).

The reality of my parents' past and my future are colliding, and it’s terrifying.

Carmen McDonald is an attorney who serves as executive director of the Survivor Justice Center; she is a former Public Voices Fellow of the OpEd Project and Blue Shield California.


Read More

The Democrat Is Out in Idaho Senate Race. Now It’s Independent Todd Achilles vs. Jim Risch

Todd Achilles

Obtained from Achilles' Facebook post.

The Democrat Is Out in Idaho Senate Race. Now It’s Independent Todd Achilles vs. Jim Risch

BOISE, Idaho—David Roth, the Democratic nominee for US Senate in Idaho, ended his campaign Tuesday evening, leaving independent Todd Achilles as the only well-funded challenger to Republican Sen. Jim Risch.

Roth's statement did not mention Achilles. It did not mention Risch either. Instead, the Idaho Falls consultant said he had "concluded that I can make the greatest difference by focusing my time and energy on helping Democrats win up and down the ballot."

Keep ReadingShow less
Military education. Student in soldier uniform learning at wooden table indoors, selective focus

Millions join the military to afford college. This essay examines military education benefits, student debt, and why higher education shouldn't depend on military service.

Liudmila Chernetska/Getty Images

You Shouldn't Have to Go To War to Go To College

There are many reasons to join the military, but one of the most enticing is education. Indeed, a 2017 poll conducted by the Department of Defense found that 49% of Army recruits signed up to pay for their education. It makes sense. Military education packages are incredibly attractive, which is quite the recruitment carrot. For a huge number of recruits, joining the military means finding a way to pay for school they couldn’t otherwise afford. That may say less about the luster of military benefits and more about a problem in our public policy. As education scholar William Ayers wrote back in 2006, as recruitment fell short of quotas, “High schools have thus become battlefields for the hearts and minds of young people…recruiters dangle gifts and promises of future benefits before teenagers in an effort to fill the ranks of an all-volunteer military.” Is our country making it hard to get an education on purpose?

Some critics suggest military recruitment strategies have sought to weaponize poverty. By the 1980s, the term "poverty draft" had gained traction, articulating the idea that the enlisted ranks of the military were composed of young people with limited economic opportunities. There is speculation that the Pentagon even embraced programs like No Child Left Behind as part of a broader strategy to improve recruitment by targeting low-income youth. Though these may be cynical perspectives on a simple matter of correlation, it does appear that the military struggles to draw youth to join the ranks whenever more attractive alternative economic pathways emerge. After a long recruitment drought, last year’s numbers finally climbed, but Army officials link it to “a higher unemployment rate among people aged 16 to 24…” In other words, if the economy is depressed enough, as long as the military is one of the few employers still hiring, a recruitment drought won’t be so obvious.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two people sitting next to each other as one person works with clay.

Global civic education helps students build trust, navigate ambiguity, and work across differences. Research shows it can strengthen civic leadership and reduce polarization.

Photo Courtesy of Tilting Futures

Why Fixing Polarization Requires Students to Cross Borders

I've been running global civic education programs for twelve years, and I keep seeing the same pattern: college-age students arrive believing they know how the world works and that their perspective is fact. Months later, after sustained global engagement, they return home fundamentally different, with their walls down and having gained a visceral understanding that their perspective is just that: a perspective, not the truth.

There's a reason this transformation matters so much at this age. This is the moment when mental models solidify into frameworks about how the world works, about who deserves trust, and about what's possible across difference. But without exposure to people and cultures that have alternative perspectives, those frameworks harden into us-versus-them certainties rather than nurture curiosity, further entrenching the polarization that is fracturing our country. Too often this polarization is framed as a knowledge problem rather than a moral perception problem.

Keep ReadingShow less
Voter receives a pen from poll worker at polling station.

A civic petition calling for constitutional restraint, civil discourse, bipartisan cooperation, and equal justice to strengthen American democracy and national unity.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

A Contemporary Olive Branch Petition

To the President of the United States, the Leaders of the Congress, and Our Fellow Americans Entrusted with the Powers of Government:

When, in the ordinary course of a free republic, disagreements arise among citizens concerning the proper exercise of power, it is neither unusual nor dishonorable that earnest convictions should differ. Such diversity has long been the strength of our nation, for liberty has never depended upon unanimity of opinion, but upon mutual respect under a common Constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less