Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Inherited Stage

Opinion

Declaration of Independence
When, in 2026, the United States marks the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, we should take pride in our collective journey.
Douglas Sacha/Getty Images

A friend recently asked if I was optimistic about the future. Not in any particular context - just one of those casual what kind of person are you kind of questions. I stopped what I was doing. Little did this inquirer know that I was in the midst of a months-long journey into the Founding era of America, and that this particular question was among the first things considered by the people we recognize as our founders. My free time had been enveloped by nonfiction, documentaries, podcasts, and reflective writing. And here, in advance of the country's 250th birthday, was the right question for, as it turned out, the right person. I took a breath and lobbed my answer back -

“Do I really have a choice?”


War moved across America’s Eastern seaboard, and one of the hottest summers on record gripped Philadelphia. The Second Continental Congress convened in early July to decide whether to approve the Declaration of Independence. The Continental Army waited in New York for the approaching full force of the Empire. The moment was upon the Congressional delegates. Some demanded independence, others hesitated. After hours of back-and-forth in the steamy State House, the delegates unanimously approved the Declaration of Independence.

Utter jubilation followed. Church bells rang, choirs sang, as a newly independent people danced in the street. John Adams promptly remarked that this was to “be celebrated, by succeeding Generations, as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance...with Pomp and Parade, with...Bonfires and Illuminations from one End of the Continent to the other from this Time forward forever more.”

The American experiment was underway. It was the first true step in the Founders’ vision of self-governance. No longer did government mean kings, queens, crowns, or inherited titles passed without a nod from the governed. In an instant, the Declaration turned that world upside down. It was the first time any nation, country, kingdom, or empire was to implement a government where the power to govern is derived from the people. Today, I am one of over 340 million hereditary participants - born into a political experiment unlike any before it.

The Declaration was a product of the Enlightenment - specifically the argument that government ought to derive its legitimacy from the consent of the governed. A radical idea, brought forth by the Founders from Thomas Jefferson’s pen, ultimately reached new heights. The Declaration did two things. First, it severed America's colonial relationship with the British Empire by explicitly announcing America's independence. This was the political purpose of the Declaration. But this part of the document merely cut the cord – it was not the ink that birthed the nation. America sprang to life when Jefferson put to paper the following words:

We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal...

This is where America took its first breath.

Even more remarkable than the uniqueness of such an assertion during an age of monarchy is the self-awareness of these words. Imagine if Jefferson had instead written, We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all white land-owning males are created equal…But he didn’t write that. The Founders understood they were confined by time and space and that they, themselves, were incapable of ever fulfilling the equality clause of the Declaration they had crafted.

But they believed future Americans could.

Newly-elected President George Washington wrote in 1790:

As mankind become more liberal they will be more apt to allow, that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the Community are equally entitled to the protection of civil Government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations in examples of justice and liberality.

Jefferson echoed the President, also in 1790, that, “the ground of liberty is to be gained by inches, that we must be contented to secure what we can get from time to time, and eternally press forward for what is yet to get.”

The Founders called it the great stage of life. It is the same stage we walk today - in our cities and towns, our neighborhoods, among ourselves. Transcending time and political order, the Founders’ words remind us that those inches are ours to find. It is built into the bedrock of our lives. Where do we find them on the stage we walk today?

The great play we find ourselves a part of is never complete because the Founders’ great promise can never be fully achieved. The human condition resists any final settling of that promise. Our ability to create and nurture is matched by our capacity to tear down - total equality remains an unreachable horizon. The Founders’ task will never be completed.

And yet it is precisely this awareness, born in 1776, that makes the Declaration’s words so extraordinary. They are eternal, even as our concept of equality has evolved. So long as a single child’s face is stained by the tears of neglect - so long as a single door is shut to the beggar - so long as a single person is judged not for who they are but for what they appear to be – the stage remains beneath our feet, and we play our part as the light slowly shifts from us to the next generation.

Ours is a struggle created by, of, and for the people. All of them. It is the lives of real human beings – living and dead, then and now. It is a legacy of self-evident truths revealed only through the most twisting prejudice and excruciating pain. The broken ships of slavery. The unmarked graves on taken land. The hush of a thousand songs. We face that cracked mirror, always showing how far we can go. And we are still finding our way.

On the last day of his presidency, George Washington reflected on 40 years of public service and the hope that generations to come would take up the nation’s laboring oar:

I trust...that the good sense of our countrymen will guard the public [interest]…and that, altho[ugh] we may be a little wrong now and then, we shall return to the right path with more [vigor].

This lasting trust rests on a simple belief: neither the Founders nor the government alone could fulfill the Declaration’s bold claim of equality. It would take the people, generation after generation. Person after person.

On this Fourth of July, this trust lives on - in ourselves and through each other - as we together briefly stand on this inherited stage.

[A]n abstract truth, applicable to all men and all times, and so embalm it there, that to-day, and in all coming days, it shall be a rebuke and a stumbling-block to the very harbingers of re-appearing tyranny and oppression.

-Abraham Lincoln, 1859

Kevin Tibolt is a resident of Portland, Oregon.


Read More

Voter receives a pen from poll worker at polling station.

A civic petition calling for constitutional restraint, civil discourse, bipartisan cooperation, and equal justice to strengthen American democracy and national unity.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

A Contemporary Olive Branch Petition

To the President of the United States, the Leaders of the Congress, and Our Fellow Americans Entrusted with the Powers of Government:

When, in the ordinary course of a free republic, disagreements arise among citizens concerning the proper exercise of power, it is neither unusual nor dishonorable that earnest convictions should differ. Such diversity has long been the strength of our nation, for liberty has never depended upon unanimity of opinion, but upon mutual respect under a common Constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close-up shot of a Black woman's hands receiving a mail-in ballot to vote in a USA Presidential, Senatorial, Congressional, or local election

Federal investigators spent eight months reviewing the Allied Pilots Association election, examining ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and transparency before allowing the results to stand.

Jeremy Poland/Getty Images

What a Federal Investigation of a Union Election Can Teach Us About Democratic Trust

For eight months, federal investigators examined allegations involving ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and reporting procedures in a contested union election before allowing the result to stand.

Following a disputed election within the Allied Pilots Association (APA), complaints led to a formal review by the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Labor-Management Standards. Investigators spent months going through election records, audit logs, witness testimony and technical documentation before reaching their conclusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
50501 Movement – Thomas Paine’s Political Philosophy in the 21st Century

circa 1770: The English-born American revolutionary philosopher Thomas Paine, (1737 - 1809), who wrote and published 'The Rights of Man', (1791 - 1792), in England. In it he expressed his support for the French Revolution and called for the overthrow of the British monarchy.

(Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

50501 Movement – Thomas Paine’s Political Philosophy in the 21st Century

The 50501 Movement can be viewed as a 21st-century manifestation of the anti-authoritarian, pro-egalitarian framework that Thomas Paine championed in Common Sense. Both movements share a core belief in challenging entrenched power and mobilizing the collective voice of everyday people to defend democracy. By utilizing decentralized, nationwide grassroots mobilization to challenge executive overreach and billionaire consolidation, the 50501 movement directly echoes Paine’s anti-authoritarianism, his belief in collective civic power, and his demand that power remains in the hands of the people.

The 50501 Movement mirrors the spirit of Paine’s Common Sense through three primary parallels:

Keep ReadingShow less
  Creative Images & Video Creative Images & Video Images Creative Editorial Video Creative Editorial  Search by image or video I Voted Today paper sticker on mans finger on rustic wooden table

How class, identity, and political recognition shaped the Democratic Party's relationship with rural white working-class voters over two decades.

BackyardProduction/Getty Images

The Thousand Injuries: The Not-Qwhite Voter and the Politics of Recognition

In the fall of 2003, Howard Dean said he wanted to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in the back windows of their pickup trucks. It was clumsy but not dishonest. He meant that his party had written off a whole category of American voter and wanted to change that. He was attacked at once, mostly by his own side, and walked it back within forty-eight hours. The lesson his party drew was not that the outreach had been badly phrased; It was that the outreach itself was impermissible, that to pursue the rural white working class voter was to be complicit with everything he was presumed to represent. Dean was the last major Democrat to try, and the consequences have accumulated in the shape of the electoral map.

Edgar Allan Poe understood something the party still does not. "The Cask of Amontillado" opens with a line that ought to hang in every campaign office: the thousand injuries of Fortunato the narrator had borne as best he could, but when Fortunato ventured upon insult, he vowed revenge. Injuries can be borne as long as the injured man believes his tormentors still regard his suffering as real. The insult is different. It reframes the injuries as deserved, telling the sufferer he is the kind of person who deserves to suffer. Poe's narrator does not recalculate his interests; he takes his revenge at great cost to himself. That is not irrational but human, and it is the most precise framework we have for what has happened to rural white working-class voters over the last twenty years.

Keep ReadingShow less