Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

President Trump and His Allies Are Trying to Make It Harder for Americans to Vote

A raft of new legislation threatens Americans’ most basic right to the ballot

Opinion

President Trump and His Allies Are Trying to Make It Harder for Americans to Vote
two stickers with the words i vote on them
Photo by Mockup Free on Unsplash

President Trump and his administration have been working diligently to try to undermine Americans’ trust in our elections. The steady drumbeat of lies and disinformation is intended to give cover to their efforts to interfere in our elections and stack the deck in their own favor. Time and time again, we see them justify their actions by making false claims of widespread fraud from noncitizens voting (something that is exceedingly rare). Back in 2020, we saw secretaries of state from both parties hold the line and protect our elections from executive branch interference. However, this year, President Trump is prepared to go further. From deploying the FBI to raid local elections offices in Fulton County, Georgia, to the President’s repeated claim that the only way the opposing party can win is by “cheating,” the administration has been working overtime to sow doubt in our elections.

That’s bad enough. But now, the President’s allies in Congress are getting in on the act with a raft of new legislation that would trample Americans’ most basic right: the right to vote. As former members of Congress, we are deeply concerned.


This bundle of so-called “election security” bills consists of the SAVE Act, the SAVE America Act, and the MEGA Act. Advocates for these bills argue that they are necessary to combat voter fraud, but the truth is that voter fraud is already extremely rare, and this legislation would make it harder for millions of American citizens to vote. Perhaps even more worrisome, one bill in particular — the MEGA Act — would effectively nationalize elections, violating states’ rights and concentrating unprecedented power over elections in the executive branch.

But that’s exactly what President Trump and his allies want.

Mere days after the FBI’s Fulton County raid, the President called on Republicans to “nationalize” elections, which conservatives would’ve thought unimaginable just a few short years ago. Nationalizing America’s elections would be a flagrant violation of Article I of the U.S. Constitution, which gives the states control of our elections. If the MEGA Act were to become law, it would come with sweeping consequences for voters: opaque purges from voter rolls, stricter ballot deadlines, restricted registration and voting methods, voter eligibility screening by political appointees with flawed federal databases, new executive branch authority over sensitive voter data and election systems, and more. The consequences would be disastrous: disenfranchising eligible voters, imposing serious, unfunded burdens on overworked state and local officials, and violating states’ Constitutional right to administer their own elections.

Similarly, the SAVE and SAVE America Acts would implement stringent documentation requirements, forcing voters to bring a birth certificate or U.S. passport in person just to register to vote, and requiring them to update their registration every time they move or change their name. This is an attack on married women who have changed their last names and have a discrepancy with what is on their birth certificate. And, these bills take away the conventional option to register or update registration online or by mail. The SAVE America Act would go further by tacking on federally mandated on-site citizenship re-verification and strict voter identification rules that would shift authority away from local election administrators and into the hands of Washington. Last year, nearly 60 bipartisan election officials sent a letter to Congress opposing the SAVE Act.

Some of these may seem like reasonable requirements at first glance. But this is not about common-sense election improvements. It is about placing the machinery of voter registration and list maintenance — including the power to purge voters and control sensitive personal data — under the executive branch's political control. And it is about making registration and voting much harder for millions of American citizens who do not readily have access to these documents. Seniors, newlyweds, military service members, rural voters, citizens in the process of moving — there are any number of reasons why someone may not have immediate access to all the necessary, up-to-date documents. The Constitution protects the right of American citizens to vote. It must not be undermined or weaponized based on unreasonably high hurdles that prevent eligible voters from casting a ballot.

Election security and access are not mutually exclusive. Americans deserve free and fair elections without unnecessary, politically motivated restrictions. We must protect the integrity of our elections. And in so doing, we must ensure eligible citizens are not discouraged from exercising their civic duties.

This week, the Senate will debate the SAVE America Act. And in the coming weeks, Congress will likely continue to vote on one or more of these pieces of legislation. Call your senators and representatives to demand that they reject these bills and any attempt to centralize political control over elections. Instead, insist that they uphold the Constitution and the rights of the citizens they serve. Let us be abundantly clear: these are dangerous bills designed to undermine the Constitution and make it harder for more Americans to vote.
Peter Smith, a Republican, served in Congress representing Vermont’s at-large district from 1989-1991.

Elizabeth Holtzman, a Democrat, served in Congress representing New York’s 16th congressional district from 1973-1981. Both are now members of Issue One's ReFormers Caucus.


Read More

Foreign Influence vs. Foreign Interference in Elections

Person wearing a hoodie, typing on a computer in the dark.

Xijian/Getty

Foreign Influence vs. Foreign Interference in Elections

Working alongside election denier activists, the Trump administration is reportedly exploring how to use the power of the federal government to take over elections from the states. One of the justifications for this takeover is based on allegations of foreign interference in the 2020 presidential race.

Experts agree that there is no evidence of foreign interference in 2020, although there were instances of influence by countries such as Russia and Iran. Subsequent elections have been subject to a range of foreign influence efforts. Influence and interference are not the same, but President Trump and his supporters conflate the two concepts when raising the specter of foreign meddling in U.S. elections. This confusion is evident in a purported draft executive order that outlines how the administration may seek to violate the Constitution and federalize the administration of elections.

Keep ReadingShow less
Primaries Are Already Shaping the 2026 Election – Here’s What We’re Seeing So Far
a person is casting a vote into a box

Primaries Are Already Shaping the 2026 Election – Here’s What We’re Seeing So Far

Primary elections are already underway across the United States, and this year’s contests are giving early clues about what voters may prioritize in the general election.

Several states have recently held high-profile primary races that could influence the balance of power in Congress over the next two years, in both state-wide and local elections. Many of these races involve open seats or competitive districts, making the outcomes especially significant as parties prepare for November.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fulcrum Roundtable: Election Interference
a group of people outside a building

Fulcrum Roundtable: Election Interference

President Donald Trump’s comments urging Republicans to “nationalize” elections have intensified debate over the future of U.S. election administration. In an interview last month on Dan Bongino’s podcast, Trump repeated disproven claims of widespread voter fraud and argued that the GOP should “take over” voting operations in multiple states.

Amherst College professor and legal scholar Austin Sarat joined Executive Editor Hugo Balta on this month's edition of The Fulcrum Roundtable for a wide‑ranging conversation on the state of American democracy and the challenges facing the nation’s electoral system.

Keep ReadingShow less
Three candidates vie to become the first Latino Representative for Illinois Congressional District

(left to right): 1. Anabel Mendoza speaking at the Forum for 7th US Congressional District Democratic Candidates at Harry Caray’s 7th Inning Stretch in Streeterville. Video still. By Britton Struthers-Lugo, February 26, 2026.2. Jazmin Robinson (left) sitting at the Forum for 7th US Congressional District Democratic Candidates at Harry Caray’s 7th Inning Stretch in Streeterville. By Britton Struthers-Lugo, February 26, 2026. 3. Felix Tello speaking at the Forum for 7th US Congressional District Democratic Candidates at Harry Caray’s 7th Inning Stretch in Streeterville.

Video still. By Britton Struthers-Lugo, February 26, 2026. Illinois Latino News

Three candidates vie to become the first Latino Representative for Illinois Congressional District

United States Representative Danny Davis announced in July 2025 that he would not be seeking re-election in Illinois’s 7th Congressional District, motivating 13 Democrats and two Republicans to compete for the seat.

As the Illinois primary on March 17 approaches, three Latino candidates hope to become the Democratic nominee: Anabel Mendoza, Jazmin J. Robinson, and Felix Tello. The district has never had a Latino representative, and former Rep. Cardiss Collins remains the only woman to have served the district.

Keep ReadingShow less