Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Tax-Season Trap: When Refunds Become a Child Care Safety Net

Opinion

The Tax-Season Trap: When Refunds Become a Child Care Safety Net

Man receives a tax refund check from the government; Indoor background

Getty Images

Most parents are more than happy to receive a tax refund. That money can help pay bills, fund a long-overdue vacation, or simply offer breathing room. But for too many families, especially Black families, that refund is not extra. It too often becomes a temporary relief from a child care gap created by school systems that are no longer designed around the realities of working families.

Schools are supposed to be structured in a child’s best interest. In practice, hardships are built into an antiquated design. Seventy percent of Black parents work service-essential nine-to-five roles, yet schools dismiss in the early afternoon. Parents are left scrambling to find and pay for before- and after-school care, babysitters for holidays, teacher workdays, and full-time summer camps. Those gap hours and summer care costs average to about $400 to $500 per week. For many households, that equals an entire paycheck.


While headlines celebrate the “Big Beautiful Bill” and the $2,200 Child Tax Credit (CTC), the reality for many families is a math problem that simply is not mathing. The Child Tax Credit is separate from the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (CDCTC), which offsets only a portion of child care expenses against taxes owed and does not provide a broad refund for most families. Schools create an expensive care gap with half days, holidays, professional development days, and extended breaks. Add in sick days, and they rarely align with the average 11 days of PTO most workers receive each year. For African American parents, the situation is even more fragile. One report shows that 30 to 40 percent of Black parents have no paid sick days at all.

On average, parents spend between $4,000 and $6,600 per year covering care during school closures. That number alone explains why so many families feel squeezed. The broader tax credit story makes the gap clearer. In 2021, during the height of the pandemic, families received up to $3,000 per child, which is closer to filling the actual child care gap. By 2024, that support dropped to $2,000. Now, this administration wants us to celebrate a $200 increase that brings the total to $2,200 in 2026.

This small increase does not bridge the $4,000 minimum child care gap. A once-a-year check does not pay a once-a-month childcare bill. Some might say this sounds like it is about entitlement. No, it is about infrastructure to support a robust workforce. The current tax system has retreated from families while child care costs continue to climb.

Staying home with a child who has a runny nose is often framed as a simple parenting decision, but for many African American families, it is a financial risk. One survey shows that 76 percent of African American households report living paycheck to paycheck. Missing work to cover child care gaps can mean missing rent, utilities, and a financial spiral that takes months to recover from.

That is not entitlement. It is a broken system, and if we want real change, we have to address the design flaws. We need to bridge the hours between 7 AM and 7 PM for working families. Teacher professional development can happen after school or online. Half days should be eliminated completely. Weeklong breaks should be aligned in schools across the state, so families with children in multiple districts do not have to juggle different calendars. When schools are closed, affordable full-day care options should exist.

Families earning under $100,000 per year need meaningful subsidies that reduce monthly costs. Child care centers also need accessible funding to lower tuition without compromising quality.

Employers must also adapt. Workplace holidays should better align with school calendars. Parents who can work remotely should be allowed to do so. The pandemic proved that remote work is possible in many industries. At the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic, an estimated 60 to 70 percent of full-time employees were working from home. Also, paid parental leave must be standard if employers require in-office work. Some companies offer monthly child care perks for employees on websites like Care.com as part of their benefit package. Employers cannot continue to demand full availability from parents while ignoring the structural gaps that make availability barely possible.

Tax refunds mean you overpaid taxes and were never meant to be survival checks. Yet for many working families, especially Black families, that is exactly what they have become. Until we redesign school schedules, workplace expectations, or tax policies to reflect the real cost of raising children, that annual refund will continue to serve as a reimbursement for a predictable failure we Americans keep pretending is normal.

Janice Robinson-Celeste is a former educator and the founder of Successful Black Parenting Magazine, a multi-award-winning publication that empowers Black families. She is a Public Voices fellow of the OpEd Project in partnership with the National Black Child Development Institute.



Read More

Congress at sunset

America's national debt is projected to reach $45 trillion by 2029. Explore Congress's constitutional "Power of the Purse," federal spending, appropriations, and the policies contributing to rising deficits.

Bill Clark/Getty Images

Congress Must Enforce the Power of the Purse as Debt Soars

“No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law” (Appropriations Clause, Article I, Section 9, Clause 7, U.S. Constitution). Congress’s “Power of the Purse” means the President cannot spend money or authorize expenditures unless Congress has passed a specific law funding it (Congress.gov).

According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the non-partisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, the total federal debt held by Americans is on track to hit $40 trillion by the end of 2026. Currently, every resident in America carries a $122,642 share of this debt.

Keep ReadingShow less
​A Lebanese girl returns with her family to live amid the ruins of an apartment wrecked by Israeli strikes.

A Lebanese girl returns with her family to live amid the ruins of an apartment wrecked by Israeli strikes in the Houch neighborhood, after being displaced for weeks by war between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah militia that has displaced 1.2 million Lebanese, on April 28, 2026, in Tyre, Lebanon.

Scott Peterson / Getty Images

Please Don't Feed the Warmongers

I was recently catching up with an old friend from my Navy Reserve Officer Training Corps days who told me about some young sailors he knew in Bahrain tasked with intercepting hostile drones. Critically, as highly disciplined professionals, they have become extraordinarily good at it. My friend and I, with over twenty years of active duty service as military officers between us, discussed the extent to which their competence and vigilance are keeping them, and other Americans deployed in the area, alive, all while their leadership in Washington treats war with an increasingly terrifying callousness.

As brave servicemembers risk their lives on the front lines, Trump brags about how much money he’s making as president. It is true that for those invested in the types of industries that thrive during armed conflict, this war in Iran is a windfall. Trump himself invested between $9.7 million and $24.3 million in arms manufacturers and Pentagon contractors in 2025. Why would he end the war?

Keep ReadingShow less
A father voting, with his young son standing by him, watching him.

Citizens cast their vote during the 2026 presidential runoff in Colombia on June 21, 2026 in Barranquilla, Colombia. Ivan Cepeda, candidate for the Pacto Historico party and Abelardo de la Espriella, candidate for the Salvación Nacional, face in a tight runoff to rule Colombia from 2026 to 2030.

Leonardo Castañeda/Getty Images

Colombia’s Election Matters—Especially to Ecuador and the U.S.

In a closely fought election on June 21, conservative outsider Abelardo De La Espriella prevailed over Iván Cepeda, an ally of current leftist president, Gustavo Petro. Central to the electorate’s choice were distinct policy proposals to fight criminality and the drug cartels, who control large swaths of Colombian territory. The policies president-elect De La Espriella will bring to the fight against these issues matter greatly, not only to Colombia, but to neighboring Ecuador and the United States.

Earlier in March, Ecuadorian President Noboa, desperate to gain traction in his own drug war, announced a partnership with the U.S. to conduct joint operations against drug cartels. The partnership quickly went awry. A New York Times investigation of the first strike indicates that what the joint militaries considered a drug camp was in fact a dairy farm, with no drug connection. Then, on March 17, Colombia accused Ecuador of bombing within its territory with U.S. involvement. These incidents resulted in U.S. lawmakers calling for a suspension of joint operations on May 13. Very quickly, the U.S. partnership has reopened the scars of the Plan Colombia era of the early 2000s, where an overly militaristic approach to the drug war funded by the U.S. resulted in human rights abuses and false positives.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult grandson teaching his grandfather to use laptop, close-up.

Social Security faces a funding crisis by 2032 that could cut retirement benefits by 22%. Learn what's driving the shortfall and how it could be fixed.

Westend61 / Getty Images

Social Security Faces a 2032 Crisis with Deep Benefit Cuts Ahead

A financial tsunami of giant proportions is heading our way. And it is due to arrive in about six years. Policymakers have known about this tsunami for some time, but in June, we found out the Big Wave is taller than anyone knew.

That’s when the Social Security Trustees released their latest report on the financial health of the popular Social Security retirement program. According to the trustees’ report, the outlook is not good – Social Security’s solvency is in danger. By 2032, the Social Security fund will fall short by about $2.5 trillion of the money needed to pay the 52 million American retirees their full retirement benefits. Previously, it was thought that the tsunami would make landfall in 2034, but the finances are deteriorating faster than expected. If no presidential and congressional intervention is mounted, retirees will take about a 22 percent haircut, meaning any senior beneficiary who was receiving $3000 per month will see that chopped to about $2300 per month, a loss of about $8000 per year.

Keep ReadingShow less