Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

First Tax Season With Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill Tax Cuts Disproportionately Harms Black Community

Despite having the nickname “The Working Families Tax Cut,” reports are showing the bill has had negative effects on marginalized communities.

News

First Tax Season With Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill Tax Cuts Disproportionately Harms Black Community
Calendar shows "tax day" circled on the 15th.

WASHINGTON – According to President Donald Trump, this tax day should be a relief to working families as they see lower taxes. However, experts cautioned that many Black working-class Americans will face many negative consequences during the first tax season when the effects of President Trump’s “One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act” will take effect.

Also known as “H.R. 1,” the bill included hundreds of provisions that changed tax rates, increased the federal deficit, and cut social aid programs like Medicaid and SNAP benefits. Over the past eight months, reports have found that the bill disproportionately harms the working and middle-class Black community.


“We see that, with the passage of H.R. 1, that even with race-neutral attempts at policy change, that Black people uniquely bear many of the costs,” Portia Allen-Kyle, a civil rights attorney and social justice advocate, said in a recent webinar hosted by the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. “We’re thinking about affordability for Black families, thinking beyond wages, housing, food, childcare, and accounting for the ways that Black people interact with government.”

One of the most significant ways the bill accomplished this is through extending Trump’s 2017 “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” also known as the Trump Tax Cuts. Previously set to expire in 2025, the budget extended these changes to 2028.

“This really is a second part, or a sequel, to the 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act,” Goldburn P. Maynard Jr., a law professor at the University of Connecticut, said. “The two pieces of legislation should be beaded together.”

The Trump Tax Cuts increased the amount of State and Local Income Tax deductions an individual can take from their taxable income, raising it from $10,000 to $40,000. This results in the federal government having less revenue to use on social services. In the case of Trump’s budget, less social service revenue led to cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, and other food assistance programs.

“When you combine these policy choices with tariffs, the decision to tax consumer goods and refuse to extend healthcare credits, Black households continue to feel the squeeze,” Allen-Kyle said. “We know that regressive tax schemes always hit Black households the hardest.”

In a Tuesday interview on Capitol Hill, Sen.Raphael Warnock, D-Georgia, expressed his concerns. “This is Donald Trump’s economy – it’s not working for anybody except his billionaire friends,” he said.

At a recent White House event celebrating Black History Month, Trump claimed the opposite. “Our bill, our Beautiful Bill… this will help millions of African American children and ensure that no child is condemned to a failing government,” he said. One of the biggest ways this will manifest, according to Trump, is through families paying less in taxes.

With the federal government paying for fewer social services, states will now have to bear the burden of covering these additional costs if they want the services to continue, according to Whitney Jemison, the director of state fiscal policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

“We’re really facing dual threats coming into 2026. There’s H.R. 1, and all of the fallout from H.R. 1 based on all of the new costs and responsibilities that the bill shifted onto states,” Jemison said.

With states either having to pay more to support social services or cut them altogether, a secondary consequence is often higher prices and fees for services and goods. “Increased fees on various services… fall disproportionately on low-income households that are most often, in most states, Black households,” Jemison said.

One such example is DC native Malleek Williams. After experiencing homelessness and unemployment for the past two years and relying on social services, such as Medicaid and SNAP, Williams is worried about what cuts to these services would mean for him.

“The cost of life is becoming more expensive for the low-income/disadvantaged, such as myself,” Williams said. “I don’t want to go out there and commit a crime or steal. I don’t want to do any of that nonsense to survive…food stamps are the better route to take.”

Williams is not alone in facing recent unemployment. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the cost of living rose 2.4% in the past year, and Black unemployment currently stands at 7.1%, compared to the overall unemployment rate of 4.3%.

“There’s no question that the wealth gap is increasing under Donald Trump, impacting communities of color, other marginalized communities,” Warnock said. “Black women literally lost hundreds of thousands of jobs as a result of the Draconian cuts under DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency).”

Trump claims opposing statistics. “And since I took office, African American employment has increased by 182,000, the highest ever, jobs -- 182,000. Nearly half a million Black Americans have rejoined the labor force since we took office. Half a million,” he said.

According to the Economic Policy Institute, unemployment has increased for Black Americans by around 1.1% under the Trump administration so far. However, many experts remain hopeful that despite new challenges, affected families will persevere.

“What I see ahead is immense possibility. It will require imagination, courage, and resources, but appreciate this timely conversation, focusing on the unique experiences of Black households,” Latoya B. Parker, a senior researcher at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, concluded.

Olivia Ardito is a graduate student in journalism with Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism.


Read More

economics graph on blackboard

economics graph on blackboard

Getty Images

What Post-1971 Supply-side Economics Has Done to Veterans

Post-1971 supply-side economics—often referred to as "trickle-down economics" or "Reaganomics” fundamentally transformed the relationship between the federal government and military veterans. The year 1971 marked the end of the Bretton Woods system, the closing of the gold window, and a pivot toward neoliberal economic frameworks that prioritized deregulation, sweeping tax cuts, and aggressive federal deficit reduction via domestic spending cuts.

For veterans, who had previously benefited from the expansive, New Deal-style social investments of the original G.I. Bill, this macroeconomic paradigm shift led to four distinct structural consequences:

Keep ReadingShow less
Bank sign
The bank of ornate classical columns and facade
Photo by Leo_Visions on Unsplash

A Bank Account Should Not Come with a Political Litmus Test

The ongoing appetite for "debanking"—pressuring financial institutions to cut off customers because of who they are, what they believe, or with whom they associate—should concern everyone. Why? Because in the end, anyone can become an easy target.

One pressure point has been protests against private banks whose customers are companies who build or operate immigration detention facilities under contracts with the Trump administration. The Boston area saw such protests earlier this year, and there have been others.

Keep ReadingShow less
Oil and Energy Crisis Concept on chart over a world map

Oil and Energy Crisis Concept on chart over a world map , Stock price fell, Stock Market Volatility

Getty Images

The Oil Crisis Is an Opportunity to Develop a Different Kind of Politics

On September 14, American oil executives delivered some alarming news. “The great oil crisis is here.”

As the Wall Street Journal explained, “Commercial fuel stocks around the world have been depleting for more than six months, and strategic crude reserves can’t be tapped much further. Attacks last week shut down a crucial crude pipeline in Saudi Arabia that bypassed the Strait, stranding at least 2.5 million barrels a day from an already tight global oil market….”

Keep ReadingShow less
A male senior stands in the shadow of a Social Security card with bite missing.

Social Security faces automatic cuts in 2032 and Medicare in 2033. New polling suggests that gives Democrats a powerful election issue. Here’s the case.

DNY59 / Getty Images

Will the Debt Crisis Engineered by Republicans Succeed in Cutting Social Security and Medicare?

Overview

The Republican Party’s long game to reduce administrative state entitlement spending centers on creating a debt crisis to provide an excuse for limiting such spending. It may soon pay off. That strategy involved a quarter-century of engineered tax cuts responsible for the stunning rise in sovereign U.S. debt, threatening an eventual economic crisis.

Social Security benefits are projected under current law to be automatically cut in 2032. And Medicare benefits are projected to be automatically cut in 2033. Congressional Republicans intend for those automatic cuts to occur, opposing new taxes to prevent cuts. And they are using the ballooning national debt as an excuse to also oppose new general revenue spending to prevent benefit cuts.

Keep ReadingShow less