Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

First Tax Season With Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill Tax Cuts Disproportionately Harms Black Community

Despite having the nickname “The Working Families Tax Cut,” reports are showing the bill has had negative effects on marginalized communities.

News

First Tax Season With Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill Tax Cuts Disproportionately Harms Black Community
Calendar shows "tax day" circled on the 15th.

WASHINGTON – According to President Donald Trump, this tax day should be a relief to working families as they see lower taxes. However, experts cautioned that many Black working-class Americans will face many negative consequences during the first tax season when the effects of President Trump’s “One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act” will take effect.

Also known as “H.R. 1,” the bill included hundreds of provisions that changed tax rates, increased the federal deficit, and cut social aid programs like Medicaid and SNAP benefits. Over the past eight months, reports have found that the bill disproportionately harms the working and middle-class Black community.


“We see that, with the passage of H.R. 1, that even with race-neutral attempts at policy change, that Black people uniquely bear many of the costs,” Portia Allen-Kyle, a civil rights attorney and social justice advocate, said in a recent webinar hosted by the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. “We’re thinking about affordability for Black families, thinking beyond wages, housing, food, childcare, and accounting for the ways that Black people interact with government.”

One of the most significant ways the bill accomplished this is through extending Trump’s 2017 “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” also known as the Trump Tax Cuts. Previously set to expire in 2025, the budget extended these changes to 2028.

“This really is a second part, or a sequel, to the 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act,” Goldburn P. Maynard Jr., a law professor at the University of Connecticut, said. “The two pieces of legislation should be beaded together.”

The Trump Tax Cuts increased the amount of State and Local Income Tax deductions an individual can take from their taxable income, raising it from $10,000 to $40,000. This results in the federal government having less revenue to use on social services. In the case of Trump’s budget, less social service revenue led to cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, and other food assistance programs.

“When you combine these policy choices with tariffs, the decision to tax consumer goods and refuse to extend healthcare credits, Black households continue to feel the squeeze,” Allen-Kyle said. “We know that regressive tax schemes always hit Black households the hardest.”

In a Tuesday interview on Capitol Hill, Sen.Raphael Warnock, D-Georgia, expressed his concerns. “This is Donald Trump’s economy – it’s not working for anybody except his billionaire friends,” he said.

At a recent White House event celebrating Black History Month, Trump claimed the opposite. “Our bill, our Beautiful Bill… this will help millions of African American children and ensure that no child is condemned to a failing government,” he said. One of the biggest ways this will manifest, according to Trump, is through families paying less in taxes.

With the federal government paying for fewer social services, states will now have to bear the burden of covering these additional costs if they want the services to continue, according to Whitney Jemison, the director of state fiscal policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

“We’re really facing dual threats coming into 2026. There’s H.R. 1, and all of the fallout from H.R. 1 based on all of the new costs and responsibilities that the bill shifted onto states,” Jemison said.

With states either having to pay more to support social services or cut them altogether, a secondary consequence is often higher prices and fees for services and goods. “Increased fees on various services… fall disproportionately on low-income households that are most often, in most states, Black households,” Jemison said.

One such example is DC native Malleek Williams. After experiencing homelessness and unemployment for the past two years and relying on social services, such as Medicaid and SNAP, Williams is worried about what cuts to these services would mean for him.

“The cost of life is becoming more expensive for the low-income/disadvantaged, such as myself,” Williams said. “I don’t want to go out there and commit a crime or steal. I don’t want to do any of that nonsense to survive…food stamps are the better route to take.”

Williams is not alone in facing recent unemployment. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the cost of living rose 2.4% in the past year, and Black unemployment currently stands at 7.1%, compared to the overall unemployment rate of 4.3%.

“There’s no question that the wealth gap is increasing under Donald Trump, impacting communities of color, other marginalized communities,” Warnock said. “Black women literally lost hundreds of thousands of jobs as a result of the Draconian cuts under DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency).”

Trump claims opposing statistics. “And since I took office, African American employment has increased by 182,000, the highest ever, jobs -- 182,000. Nearly half a million Black Americans have rejoined the labor force since we took office. Half a million,” he said.

According to the Economic Policy Institute, unemployment has increased for Black Americans by around 1.1% under the Trump administration so far. However, many experts remain hopeful that despite new challenges, affected families will persevere.

“What I see ahead is immense possibility. It will require imagination, courage, and resources, but appreciate this timely conversation, focusing on the unique experiences of Black households,” Latoya B. Parker, a senior researcher at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, concluded.

Olivia Ardito is a graduate student in journalism with Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism.


Read More

​A Lebanese girl returns with her family to live amid the ruins of an apartment wrecked by Israeli strikes.

A Lebanese girl returns with her family to live amid the ruins of an apartment wrecked by Israeli strikes in the Houch neighborhood, after being displaced for weeks by war between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah militia that has displaced 1.2 million Lebanese, on April 28, 2026, in Tyre, Lebanon.

Scott Peterson / Getty Images

Please Don't Feed the Warmongers

I was recently catching up with an old friend from my Navy Reserve Officer Training Corps days who told me about some young sailors he knew in Bahrain tasked with intercepting hostile drones. Critically, as highly disciplined professionals, they have become extraordinarily good at it. My friend and I, with over twenty years of active duty service as military officers between us, discussed the extent to which their competence and vigilance are keeping them, and other Americans deployed in the area, alive, all while their leadership in Washington treats war with an increasingly terrifying callousness.

As brave servicemembers risk their lives on the front lines, Trump brags about how much money he’s making as president. It is true that for those invested in the types of industries that thrive during armed conflict, this war in Iran is a windfall. Trump himself invested between $9.7 million and $24.3 million in arms manufacturers and Pentagon contractors in 2025. Why would he end the war?

Keep ReadingShow less
A father voting, with his young son standing by him, watching him.

Citizens cast their vote during the 2026 presidential runoff in Colombia on June 21, 2026 in Barranquilla, Colombia. Ivan Cepeda, candidate for the Pacto Historico party and Abelardo de la Espriella, candidate for the Salvación Nacional, face in a tight runoff to rule Colombia from 2026 to 2030.

Leonardo Castañeda/Getty Images

Colombia’s Election Matters—Especially to Ecuador and the U.S.

In a closely fought election on June 21, conservative outsider Abelardo De La Espriella prevailed over Iván Cepeda, an ally of current leftist president, Gustavo Petro. Central to the electorate’s choice were distinct policy proposals to fight criminality and the drug cartels, who control large swaths of Colombian territory. The policies president-elect De La Espriella will bring to the fight against these issues matter greatly, not only to Colombia, but to neighboring Ecuador and the United States.

Earlier in March, Ecuadorian President Noboa, desperate to gain traction in his own drug war, announced a partnership with the U.S. to conduct joint operations against drug cartels. The partnership quickly went awry. A New York Times investigation of the first strike indicates that what the joint militaries considered a drug camp was in fact a dairy farm, with no drug connection. Then, on March 17, Colombia accused Ecuador of bombing within its territory with U.S. involvement. These incidents resulted in U.S. lawmakers calling for a suspension of joint operations on May 13. Very quickly, the U.S. partnership has reopened the scars of the Plan Colombia era of the early 2000s, where an overly militaristic approach to the drug war funded by the U.S. resulted in human rights abuses and false positives.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult grandson teaching his grandfather to use laptop, close-up.

Social Security faces a funding crisis by 2032 that could cut retirement benefits by 22%. Learn what's driving the shortfall and how it could be fixed.

Westend61 / Getty Images

Social Security Faces a 2032 Crisis with Deep Benefit Cuts Ahead

A financial tsunami of giant proportions is heading our way. And it is due to arrive in about six years. Policymakers have known about this tsunami for some time, but in June, we found out the Big Wave is taller than anyone knew.

That’s when the Social Security Trustees released their latest report on the financial health of the popular Social Security retirement program. According to the trustees’ report, the outlook is not good – Social Security’s solvency is in danger. By 2032, the Social Security fund will fall short by about $2.5 trillion of the money needed to pay the 52 million American retirees their full retirement benefits. Previously, it was thought that the tsunami would make landfall in 2034, but the finances are deteriorating faster than expected. If no presidential and congressional intervention is mounted, retirees will take about a 22 percent haircut, meaning any senior beneficiary who was receiving $3000 per month will see that chopped to about $2300 per month, a loss of about $8000 per year.

Keep ReadingShow less
 Lego Bricks in child hands

How imagination shapes our future and the American spirit.

Ekaterina79 / Getty Images

The Dreams That Built America—and Will Carry Us Forward

Ah love, let us be true

To one another! For the world, which seems

Keep ReadingShow less