Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Ongoing Fight for Bread and Roses

Opinion

Cropped shot of a group of people joining their hands in solidarity

A new union political director explains why labor membership has halved since 1983 even as public approval hits record highs—and what's driving the gap.

LumiNola/Getty Images

Last Monday, I started a new job as the political director for IBEW 569, a local electrical workers' union based here in San Diego. In talking to friends about what I’m doing—while learning, fast, in real time, how to do the job myself—it occurred to me that there’s actually quite a knowledge gap in society today regarding an understanding of what unions are and what they’re supposed to do. So let’s get into it.

A union is, at its core, a group of workers who agree to negotiate together instead of alone. One worker asking a boss for a raise has almost no leverage. A thousand workers asking together hits different. That leverage of teamwork, that collective bargaining, is how the overtime pay, workplace safety standards, and employer-sponsored health insurance all came to exist in this country. None of it was handed down out of corporate goodwill. Fair wages (bread) and dignity (roses) were won, often at real cost. In 1890, the average workweek for manufacturing employees and building tradesmen was around 100 hours or more. Workers in Chicago who rallied for an eight-hour workday faced police violence, but we have that and weekends now because people were willing to lose their jobs, and sometimes their lives, to organize for it.


In short, organized labor is the best check and balance we have on capitalism. Capitalism is very good at rewarding capital. Unions are the mechanism that makes it answer to workers too.

Unfortunately, membership is down. In 1983, one in five American workers belonged to a union. Today, it's one in ten. But it’s not that they’re not popular. Gallup reported in September 2026 that 71% of Americans approve of labor unions and a record-high 47% of folks want unions to have more influence. So union membership has roughly halved while public approval of unions is historically high. If people like the idea of unions so much, why aren't more people in them? Well, it’s an uphill battle when those in power are so aggressively union busting.

President Trump may be the biggest union-buster this country has ever seen. Immediately after taking office again, he fired National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) member Gwynne Wilcox, explaining that Wilcox had “unduly disfavored” employers. Then, he issued executive orders to strip collective bargaining rights from more than a million federal workers. Meanwhile, at Starbucks, baristas have been organizing for years against a company notorious for labor law violations, who continue to stonewall them.

But union busting isn’t just bad for workers–it’s bad for communities. Sociologists like Robert Putnam have warned that when people stop showing up to associations that bring people together–like bowling leagues, PTAs, and, of course, unions–civic power diminishes. Unions are good for democracy. And labor-friendly policies are investments that pay the whole neighborhood back.

I live in San Diego, which was not always a union town. In 2012, it became the largest city in the country to ban project labor agreements. Ten years later, voters tossed that ban out, and this week, as thousands of delegates from across North America gather here for our union's international convention, they witness a city whose relationship with labor has transformed. In ten short years, 569 has just about doubled their working hours from around 3.3 million hours a year to 6 million. Since 1997, the number of apprentices has tripled. That’s thanks to people power.

Indeed, San Diego now has a project labor agreement covering an estimated $63 billion in construction work with the building trades. That means steady, well-paid work with benefits for working-class San Diegans, as well as projects built right. Wages have an economic multiplier effect; disposable income generally changes hands a handful of times before leaving the local economy. Agreements like these mean the whole region wins, not just the workers on the job site.

One of my predecessors told me that when she was hired, she was given one instruction: go get more work for our members. That's our attitude, because work is how people pay their mortgages, raise their families, and build lives in the communities they call home. Meanwhile, Congress just sent itself home for a recess that will stretch a month, on a year when the House has logged some of the fewest working days in recent memory. While public trust in government is so incredibly low, I hear from a lot of people that they think voting doesn’t matter. It’s hard to blame anyone with that idea as politicians repeatedly make promises and fail to live up to them. But if you're struggling to trust your government right now, try putting some of that trust in unions instead.

Labor unions put out voting guides, and I'm inclined to trust the judgment of an organization whose mission is to serve a membership of working people. Progress can be slow, but voting for ballot measures and people vetted by labor unions can help speed it along. Wherever you live, look up your local unions. Which candidates have they endorsed? Which ballot measures? This November, in Oceanside, California, for example, voters have an opportunity to revoke the city’s ban on project labor agreements. Similar fights may be happening in your town, too. Your vote can make an immediate difference.

I am proud to stand alongside my working brothers and sisters. This fight can only be won together. I hope you join us.

In solidarity.


Julie Roland was a Naval Officer for ten years, deploying to both the South China Sea and the Persian Gulf as a helicopter pilot before separating in June 2025 as a Lieutenant Commander. She has a law degree from the University of San Diego, a Master of Laws from Columbia University, and is a member of the Truman National Security Project.


Read More

​Utah Governor Spencer Cox

Utah Governor Spencer Cox

Getty Images

Spencer Cox’s Off Ramp and Utah’s Tradition of Bipartisan Leadership

Utah has long impressed me as a place where governors take bipartisan leadership seriously, and my own experience confirms it. I first saw this more than a decade ago when I met former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman through No Labels. In January 2013, Huntsman, then a Republican, joined Democrat Joe Manchin as national co‑chairs of the organization, a partnership built on the belief that durable solutions require leaders willing to cross the aisle. Working with both of them during that period left a lasting impression on me. Their partnership embodied a simple but powerful truth: when leaders choose cooperation over contempt, they expand what’s possible for the country. Huntsman and Manchin worked deliberately to model cross‑partisan problem‑solving—demonstrating that principled disagreement can coexist with shared purpose.

That experience left a lasting impression on me, and it’s one reason Governor Spencer Cox’s new book Off Ramp: How to Be a Peacemaker in an Age of Contempt resonates so strongly with me today.

Keep Reading Show less
Windows of a house

Low-angle view of two dormer windows protruding from townhouse roof

Grace Cary, Getty Images

Go Home

The distance from Washington, D.C., to my hometown of York, Pennsylvania, is 100 miles. When I worked as a Congressional staffer in D.C., I could get out of town and be back where I grew up in about an hour and a half, at least so long as I avoided rush hour traffic. Those last miles as I crossed the Pennsylvania-Maryland border brought a sense of gratitude for the relationships I would be keeping up. At my nephew’s soccer game, at an English-style pub with my long-time best friends, with my mother at the breakfast table having a local newspaper in her hands, life was ordinary.

I would return to work in D.C. feeling grounded. I felt better connected to

Keep Reading Show less
U.S. Capitol with a flag waving in front of it.

As Washington stalls, young bipartisan lawmakers in Alaska, Mississippi, and beyond are proving that cross-partisan collaboration still wins.

Douglas Rissing/Getty Images

The Politicians Who Can Fix America's Polarization Problem Will Win

Political predictions are notoriously unreliable, but here is one I am willing to stand behind: the elected officials who figure out how to govern across difference will dominate the next decade of American politics. With dysfunction and paralysis having become the status quo in Washington, elected officials who work together to get things done will turn heads, offering desperate voters a much-needed alternative to a broken system.

Consider what happened in Alaska last year. The state’s lawmaking structure does not encourage political independence. Alaska has the nation's highest veto-override threshold: three-quarters. So when a popular education bill promising smaller class sizes, a cellphone ban, and vocational training funding cleared the legislature, only to be vetoed twice by the governor, it looked dead in the water.

Keep Reading Show less
Two children playing baseball during the Little League World Series Consolation Game at Howard J. Lamade Stadium on August 25, 2024 in South Williamsport, Pennsylvania.

Jonathan Landaeta #9 of the Latin America Region team from Barquisimeto, Venezuela slides into third base past Dylan Burke #9 of the Southwest Region team from Boerne, Texas in the fifth inning during the Little League World Series Consolation Game at Howard J. Lamade Stadium on August 25, 2024 in South Williamsport, Pennsylvania

Dylan Buell/Getty Images

For Two Weeks in August, Sports Still Belong to the Kids

Late August in America has a certain sound and scene. For me, it is an ESPN broadcast and the persistent drone of a camera somewhere above a baseball diamond in Williamsport, Pennsylvania. Beneath it: a collection of 11- and 12-year-olds doing something completely ordinary and, these days, increasingly extraordinary. They are playing baseball.

The Little League World Series, as I understood it as a kid, wasn't merely a sporting event. It was a fever dream. Kids from Seoul, Tokyo, Curaçao, and Texas suddenly occupied the same outfield. Different uniforms. Different languages. Same sweat. Same tears. Same inexplicable desire to chase a high fastball with two strikes.

Keep Reading Show less