Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Why I’m Using My Influence to Defend Democracy Now

Why silence from influential voices now fuels America’s slide toward autocracy

Opinion

Why I’m Using My Influence to Defend Democracy Now

A group of people waving small American flags at sunset.

Getty stock photo

It was about this time of year in 1997 that I moved across the country and took my first job in the sector broadly known as “civil society.”

Since then, I have grown in my career. I have developed a profile. By dint of sheer survival and longevity, I have accumulated seniority.


For most of that time, I have worked in the field of democracy. It is a broad field, yet in its way a narrow one. It consists, for the most part — though not exclusively — of people who have devoted themselves to learning about and improving the structures that enable self-governance.

I have been comfortable in that field for decades.

Now, democracy in the United States faces a new threat, and so does the field. For many of us, it is hard to know what to do. Our training runs toward bridging divides, toward creating collective solutions to shared problems.

A malevolent force is now actively undermining and pulling down our democratic structures, and that training feels insufficient to the new task.

This malevolent force has set about creating new facts on the ground that will permit autocracy. It has also energized an exclusionary, racist, retrograde stream of American culture. A segment of our population is actively working to build a white Christian theocracy.

In my professional realm, where I carry some personal influence, my profile is one of institutionalism and centrism. Recently, I have begun speaking up in ways that those who have known me for years may find surprising. This includes blog posts about being a dissident and regular videos chronicling our slide into autocracy.

I am much more angular. Why?

Part of the answer is an awakening. As Donald Trump and the MAGA movement have targeted people of color, gay people, trans people, immigrants, and more, I have come closer to the personal stories of the people being targeted. I have learned how excruciating these times are for people I know and work alongside. For years, I thought of democracy as neutral toward equity — a set of structures that would serve everyone, so long as we maintained them well. I now see questions of equity and inclusion as central. A democracy that excludes some of its people is not a democracy at all. And so I see the race away from the gains of the civil rights era as fundamentally antidemocratic – as much so as the current administration’s overt attacks on journalism, civil society, and governance itself.

I am also convinced that people like me — specifically those with a similar professional profile — must speak up now and act more than ever.

What do I mean by people like me? In my case: senior, male, White, holding some positional authority and a measure of influence. I do not fool myself that I have great sway. But through the years, I have collected little bits of political, social, and professional capital.

It is my obligation, and the obligation of those similarly situated, to spend that capital in every way I can imagine, with as much energy as I can muster — to join the coalition of those working to hold back autocracy, and to hold back our shameful rush toward a white Christian nationalist society.

What might happen if more people like me speak up and act? It gives permission. Others who are similarly situated are watching. Many of them see what I see. They may hold back because the risks are real — to their institutions, their funding, their standing — and because the ingrained reflex of balance is so strong. I do not blame them. But when a colleague, someone with a similar profile, speaks plainly and remains standing, the calculation may change. It may become easier for the next person to say, too, what they see, and then to act.

That is what I am hoping for. I cannot move the country. Perhaps I can help move people like me.

For what, after all, am I saving my accumulated capital? If it remains unspent at a moment like this, it is wasted.

I intend to spend mine.

Brad Rourke is the Kettering Foundation's chief external affairs officer and director of DC operations. This piece was originally published on his personal blog. The opinions contained are his individual views and do not represent those of the Kettering Foundation.


Read More

Historical documents representing founding principles of United States on flag backdrop

As the US Constitution turns 250, one expert argues it was designed as an antidote to tyranny — and warns that antidote is now at risk.

photovs/Getty Images

Why the Constitution Remains Our Defense Against Tyranny

There are many analogies for constitutions, for example, a social contract, a blueprint, a roadmap. But as we mark the 250th birthday of the United States of America, I propose another: constitution as antidote.

Constitutions are always intentionally and carefully designed, more often than not as antidotes to heal and ward off ills that a country wishes - or existentially needs - to avoid. This is, and has historically been, true all around the world, although the study of how constitutions and constitutional change can address root causes of conflict and instability has evolved greatly, allowing us to harness their healing power more effectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
A rose stands on the 9/11 Memorial for the North Tower in front of 3 and 4 World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

A rose stands on the 9/11 Memorial for the North Tower in front of 3 and 4 World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

Gary Hershorn/Getty Images

The 9/11 Town Hall That Helped Rebuild Ground Zero—and Democracy

As the nation and the world pause this week to honor and reflect on the 25th Anniversary of the terrorist attack that brought down the twin towers of the World Trade Center and killed more than 3,000 people, I am moved to share a very personal reflection.

After serving as Chief of Staff to Governor Celeste of Ohio and in the Clinton-Gore Administration, where I experienced firsthand how the major institutions in our country interact to favor the powerful over we the people, I became deeply concerned about the health of our democracy. It was clear to me that, beyond voting and national polling, the American people were not at the table to influence the decisions that most affect their lives.

Keep ReadingShow less
People casting their ballots.

Voters cast their ballots at the Buckhead Library for the primary runoff election on June 16, 2026 in Atlanta, Georgia.

Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

Bridgers in the House Face Disproportionate Headwinds in the Midterms

Congressional collaboration on Capitol Hill has become a lost art.

At Bridge Grades, we compile non-partisan 3rd party data to rank members of Congress on how collaboratively (or divisively) they govern. Our thesis is that a more collaborative and bipartisan Congress benefits Americans through a healthier Legislative Branch, stronger checks-and-balances, and more win-win legislation in our common interests.

Keep ReadingShow less
Women walks by voting booths.

People vote in New York's primary elections at an armory and YMCA in Brooklyn on June 23, 2026, in New York City.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Surging Socialists: A Warning for Democrats

Something is happening in the Democratic Party that is making party leaders and media pundits take notice. It became impossible to ignore with Zohran Mamdani’s 2025 election as mayor of New York City. Now comes Angie Nixon’s stunning victory in Florida’s Democratic Senate primary, where she defeated an establishment opponent who outspent her by more than ten to one.

Candidates challenging capitalism are finding a receptive audience, especially among younger Democrats. They are no longer easily dismissed as isolated insurgents in liberal enclaves, though their victories do not mean socialists are taking over the party.

Keep ReadingShow less