Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

California Latinos Showed Up—Now Party Insiders Want to Shut Them Out

Opinion

California Latinos Showed Up—Now Party Insiders Want to Shut Them Out

Xavier Becerra

Getty Images

Political strategist, IVN commentator, and The Latino Century author Mike Madrid has a blunt warning for California: The campaign to repeal the state’s nonpartisan Top Two primary would disproportionately silence the fastest-growing segment of the electorate.

In a new Sacramento Bee op-ed, Madrid argues that Latino voters—particularly those who do not align with either major party—played a significant role in California’s record-setting June primary.


The state counted more than 9.4 million ballots, the highest turnout for a California gubernatorial primary since recordkeeping began in 1914. Turnout among Latino independent voters tracked near 16.5%, roughly 40% higher than in 2022.

Their participation is also growing three times faster than the electorate overall.

Madrid points to Xavier Becerra’s success in the governor’s race as evidence of what can happen when these voters participate. Becerra advanced from a crowded field while billionaire Tom Steyer, who ran what Madrid characterized as the race’s most partisan campaign, fell short.

The larger issue, Madrid argues, is that Latino voters are moving away from strict loyalty to both major parties. California’s Top Two system allows them to vote for any candidate without first choosing a party ballot.

Repealing the system would once again make their participation dependent on rules established by the political parties.

Madrid calls the repeal campaign “voter suppression aimed at the fastest-growing share of the electorate, dressed up as a return to party order.”

Polling suggests Latino voters are not asking California to go backward. A May Independent Voter Project survey found that 53% wanted to retain Top Two or expand the number of candidates who advance.

Only 22% supported eliminating the nonpartisan system and restoring partisan primaries.

Madrid’s message is simple: Latino independents showed up, helped reshape California’s most important statewide race, and demonstrated their growing political influence.

Party insiders should not respond by shutting the door in their faces.

Read Mike Madrid’s full op-ed in The Sacramento Bee.


California Latinos Showed Up—Now Party Insiders Want to Shut Them Out is republished as part of The Fulcrum’s partnership with IVN and the Latino News Network to expand voter‑first journalism and strengthen public‑centered coverage of democracy.


Read More

A person receiving a "I voted" sticker

After voting for the first time, the proud mother puts an "I voted" sticker on her daughter.

Getty Images

The Surge of Independent Voters: Why Open Primaries Are Democratically Necessary

Across the United States, traditional political affiliations are shifting as a growing segment of the electorate steps away from major-party labels. Jeremy Gruber, senior vice president at Open Primaries, a national nonpartisan organization dedicated to expanding nonpartisan voter access, highlighted this dramatic evolution in voter registration and the structural hurdles these voters face in the latest episode of The Fulcrum Roundtable.

The decline in major-party allegiance is not temporary but a sustained movement that has been building over several decades.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person holding "Vote" sign.

Person holding "Vote" sign.

Photo provided

Latino Voters Shift Ahead of Midterm Elections

Two years after providing historic levels of support that helped propel Donald Trump back to the White House, Latino voters are shifting rapidly away from the Republican Party. The realignment is driven by a potent combination of persistent economic anxieties and a sharp backlash against the administration’s aggressive domestic immigration crackdowns. A landmark national poll conducted by NBC News and Telemundo reveals that the President’s approval rating among registered Latino voters has plummeted to just 27%, signaling deep political turbulence for the GOP on the eve of critical midterm elections.

When asked by reporters outside the White House about the plunging numbers, President Trump angrily dismissed the data, labeling the findings as “fake news.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Person placing ballot in voting box

Person placing ballot in voting box

Getty Images

Who Gave the Federal Government the Right to Decide Who Can Vote?

The Trump administration is pressing to remove noncitizens from voter rolls across the country. Yet an important question seems to be missing from the debate: Where, exactly, does the federal government get the authority to impose a citizenship requirement on federal elections? The Constitution does not make citizenship a universal qualification for voting. Instead, Article I, Section 2, Clause 1 states: “The Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.” At the same time, Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 explicitly grants Congress authority over the conduct of federal elections: “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.” In Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. (2013), the U.S. Supreme Court distinguished Congress’s power to regulate how federal elections are conducted from the states’ authority to determine voter qualifications, explaining that Congress may regulate the “Times, Places and Manner” of elections, “but not who may vote in them.” For much of American history, noncitizens voted in elections in at least 22 states and territories, and some historical research suggests the number may have been as high as 40. Today, certain noncitizens are still permitted to vote in local elections in California, Maryland, Vermont and the District of Columbia. If the Constitution leaves voter qualifications to the states, what gives the federal government the authority to demand otherwise?

A Long History of State Decisions

Keep ReadingShow less
Two young people hold signs on education matters

Two young people hold signs on education matters

Oakland District Teenagers Are Going to the Poll for the Second Time This Nov. 3

Rosanna Custodio was about just 10 years old the first time her teachers walked off the job.

That was 2019, when Oakland teachers went on strike for seven days over low pay, class sizes, and support staff. They walked out again in 2022 over school closures, and again in 2023 over pay and school safety. Rosanna, now 17 and a student at Oakland High School, has kept count of how many times educators have walked out.

Keep ReadingShow less