Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

What Protest Taught Me About American Democracy

Opinion

megaphone

Hold up, above people big megaphone, bullhorn, at protest

Getty Images

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists.

We asked Pechuqui Laurata, a Fall Fulcrum Fellow, to share what democracy means to her and her view of its current health.


Ask any pupil in Cameroon what democracy means, and they will likely repeat the definition many of us knew at their age: “government of the people, by the people, for the people.” The Anglophone crisis taught me what those words are worth when a government refuses to listen.

In 2016, lawyers and teachers in Cameroon’s English-speaking regions protested the growing use of French in Anglophone courts and schools. Civilians later joined them. Security forces responded with arrests and violence. Some protesters were killed; some civilians retaliated with stones. The unrest hardened into an armed conflict that has displaced families, disrupted education, and taken thousands of lives.

I come from the Northwest Region, one of the conflict’s epicenters where I first experienced political unrest, displacement, and mass killing of innocent people, including women and children. Although democracy is preached, on paper it is practically nonexistent, and citizens do not have a voice or right to protest. This challenges democratic beliefs that citizens must be free to hold powerholders publicly accountable and that the government must answer to them.

After that political crisis, I began to see how democracy is being practiced differently in different countries while I was still in Cameroon in 2020. When a Minneapolis police officer killed George Floyd, I watched Americans on TV march through the streets demanding justice and accountability from the police. From thousands of miles away, I was struck by how their democratic rights allow them to protest and challenge the governing power, confront powerful institutions, hold them accountable, and force a national conversation. That history shaped how I see a democratic system in practice in America.

The police response, however, was chaotic. Police arrested more than 10,000 people during the first 10 days of demonstrations. Police used tear gas, rubber bullets, and other force against protesters and journalists. Many arrests involved curfew violations or failure to disperse rather than violence.

What happened afterward mattered. Prosecutors dismissed many charges against peaceful demonstrators. In Cincinnati, prosecutors dismissed charges against 479 nonviolent protesters arrested for violating curfews. Five years later, the city approved an $8.1 million settlement resolving their claims of wrongful arrest, police brutality, inhumane detention conditions and unlawful property seizures.

The Black Lives Matters movement produced many forms of accountability including the conviction of Derek Chauvin of murdering Floyd. Some states and local governments changed policing rules, and President Joe Biden restricted certain federal practices through a 2022 executive order. But Congress failed to pass the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, and several reform efforts later stalled or were reversed.

The lesson was not that American democracy worked perfectly. It was that citizens could expose its failures and use courts, elections and public pressure to demand a response. That distinction is why I judge democracy not by absence of conflict, but by whether institutions respond to it.

After I arrived at UC Berkeley, protest in America was no longer something I watched through a screen. In fact, I have witnessed many of them happening around Berkeley and in Oakland. For instance, in November 2025, I saw protestors opposing a Turning Point USA event at Zellerbach Hall. Police surrounded the area to ensure the safety of the protestors and people participating to avoid any physical confrontation among the opposing parties. Although some confrontations occurred and a few people were arrested, the program continued inside while protesters voiced their opposition outside. This shows how competing political voices can coexist when authorities are there to protect violence.

The No Kings demonstrations in March 2026 carried that tradition across the country. Thousands of protests took place in all 50 states, with organizers estimating that millions participated. In Berkeley, I watched how the police stood there and watched protesters go along. For what I remember watching from a close distance, it remained peaceful in Berkeley, although some cities reported arrests and confrontations.

To Americans who see protest mainly as noise or inconvenience, that public disagreement may look like democratic disorder. But that disorder and public disruption is democracy in practice.. The First Amendment gives citizens room to challenge the government, but arrests, police force and unfinished reforms show that the right to speak does not guarantee that power will listen.

American democracy is therefore active but uneven. Its strength lies in citizens who continue to assemble and institutions that can correct abuses. Its weakness appears when officials suppress dissent or wait for public outrage before accepting responsibility.

Cameroon showed me the cost of unanswered grievances. America has stronger protections, but those protections endure only when people use them in a great way. Protest gives citizens a voice. Accountability tells us whether democracy is listening and whether their response is healthy.

Pechuqui Laurata is a fall fellow with The Fulcrum and a student at UC Berkeley School of Journalism (Master of Journalism). Guided by early experiences in Cameroon and strengthened at Berkeley, Laurata aims to produce rigorous, compassionate journalism that highlights how communities respond to hardship and where meaningful change is taking root.


Read More

A woman sitting down and speaking with a group of people.

Research shows Americans see political opponents as more extreme than reality. Learn how closing this 'perception gap' can restore civil discourse.

Getty Images, Luis Alvarez

Closing Perception Gaps Strengthens the Whole Democracy Ecosystem

Perception gaps — misunderstandings about our fellow Americans across the political spectrum — are damaging the fabric of our country. Correcting these gaps is essential to preserving the kind of democracy that respects free speech, individual dignity, and civic responsibility.

At their core, perception gaps reflect a tendency to see those in the other party as more extreme and worse than they actually are. Too often, Americans assume their political opponents are more hostile, closed-minded, dishonest, or even supportive of political violence and rule-breaking than in reality. These caricatures drive fear and division.

Keep ReadingShow less
Historical documents representing founding principles of United States on flag backdrop

As the US Constitution turns 250, one expert argues it was designed as an antidote to tyranny — and warns that antidote is now at risk.

photovs/Getty Images

Why the Constitution Remains Our Defense Against Tyranny

There are many analogies for constitutions, for example, a social contract, a blueprint, a roadmap. But as we mark the 250th birthday of the United States of America, I propose another: constitution as antidote.

Constitutions are always intentionally and carefully designed, more often than not as antidotes to heal and ward off ills that a country wishes - or existentially needs - to avoid. This is, and has historically been, true all around the world, although the study of how constitutions and constitutional change can address root causes of conflict and instability has evolved greatly, allowing us to harness their healing power more effectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
A rose stands on the 9/11 Memorial for the North Tower in front of 3 and 4 World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

A rose stands on the 9/11 Memorial for the North Tower in front of 3 and 4 World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

Gary Hershorn/Getty Images

The 9/11 Town Hall That Helped Rebuild Ground Zero—and Democracy

As the nation and the world pause this week to honor and reflect on the 25th Anniversary of the terrorist attack that brought down the twin towers of the World Trade Center and killed more than 3,000 people, I am moved to share a very personal reflection.

After serving as Chief of Staff to Governor Celeste of Ohio and in the Clinton-Gore Administration, where I experienced firsthand how the major institutions in our country interact to favor the powerful over we the people, I became deeply concerned about the health of our democracy. It was clear to me that, beyond voting and national polling, the American people were not at the table to influence the decisions that most affect their lives.

Keep ReadingShow less
People casting their ballots.

Voters cast their ballots at the Buckhead Library for the primary runoff election on June 16, 2026 in Atlanta, Georgia.

Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

Bridgers in the House Face Disproportionate Headwinds in the Midterms

Congressional collaboration on Capitol Hill has become a lost art.

At Bridge Grades, we compile non-partisan 3rd party data to rank members of Congress on how collaboratively (or divisively) they govern. Our thesis is that a more collaborative and bipartisan Congress benefits Americans through a healthier Legislative Branch, stronger checks-and-balances, and more win-win legislation in our common interests.

Keep ReadingShow less