Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Why One Young Engineer Rejects the Two‑Party Binary

Opinion

Capitol building in Washington, DC

Government reform

Getty Images

When Joshua Summers was in elementary school, his dad would come to class to perform science experiments. One time, they did an experiment to show how lightning bugs lit up.

“That was pretty cool,” he says. There was never one moment that drew him to science, but it may have helped that his mother was a nurse and his father was a mathematician.


“I was raised in a house where the benefits of science were made known,” says Joshua. “It can help you get ahead in life if you align your beliefs with something that can be proven. You’re just going to be able to do more.”

The popular science-infused YouTube channel Vsauce and his high school physics class helped him get into the University of Pittsburgh, where he recently completed a degree in mechanical engineering. So too did Minecraft, the sandbox multiplayer game where players can gather resources and build structures.

“I think Minecraft actually had a huge effect on me,” he says. The game’s constraints made it interesting. “You can’t do everything in the game, but you have to use the building blocks of the game to do what you want. And to me, that’s what engineering is.”

These days, he designs printed circuit boards at a lab. He’s hoping to pursue graduate study in engineering, with long-term aspirations to work in a university lab or for the Department of Energy.

“Being a scientific thinker can help you avoid a lot of fallacies,” he says. “You can have as many beliefs as you want, but believing in science helps you make sure that your beliefs are aligned with reality.”

That mindset applies to realms beyond engineering—including politics. An independent voter, Joshua seeks exposure to different viewpoints. Collecting many perspectives, like data, helps him sharpen his political positions.

“Imagine you’re looking at a house,” he says. “If everyone is standing on the north side of the house and looking at it, you’re only going to have twenty-five percent of the picture. You don’t know what exists on the other sides.”

However, hearing different voices can clarify the picture: “If you have people on the other side all looking at it, and you’re all communicating, you can have a better view of the house and a more informed view.”

A more informed view also entails going beyond the Democrat-versus-Republican binary. “I think if there was a two-party system and one of the parties perfectly represented my views, maybe I wouldn’t be complaining.”

Yet, he says, nuance across many political issues prevents him from affiliating with either party. With guns, for example, he sees some value in safety regulations: “I think you can treat a gun in some ways like a car,” he says. “But I’m not someone who’s like, ‘we should ban all of them.’ I think giving some power to the common citizen is a good thing.”

On foreign policy, he doesn’t identify as a hawk. “But I’m not pro-appeasement. As a Jewish person, I look at the historical background of what happened in World War II, and obviously, I don’t want that to happen again.”

But he doesn’t allocate too much political attention to the big issues. “If everyone spends their energy and money trying to get, for example, abortion or gun laws changed, we’re at a political equilibrium. We’ve been debating these issues for hundreds of years.”

In contrast, government reform has greater potential. “I think something like entropy exists in the government. It’s like rust. In general, the forces of business interests and all of these people add rust to the machine. And I think our government could operate more efficiently, like a brand new car. We can do things to get rid of the rust.”

Some starting points include making it easier to pay taxes, imposing term limits, and instituting prohibitions on stock trading by members of Congress. These issues go beyond viewing politics through a “Democrat” or “Republican” lens.

“From a general standpoint, only having two options is a terrible thing,” he says. “If you went to the grocery store and there were only two types of bread, two types of fruit—they only had apples and oranges—and there was no variation, it would suck.”

Harry Patton is Managing Editor of Independent Pennsylvanians and a Swarthmore College Lang Social Impact Fellow.


Read More

Israel's Path to Peace and Security

A voter casts her ballot at a polling station on October 27, 2026 in Jerusalem, Israel.

Noam Galai/Getty Images

Israel's Path to Peace and Security

Most people do not think that such a thing—peace and security for Israel—is possible. Yet it is possible—but it requires the wisdom and courage to chart a new path.

The old path has been to think of the Arabs—including Palestinians, even including Palestinian Israeli citizens—as being the enemy. And peace and security could only be achieved through military superiority and dominance over an implacable enemy. Whether the government was Labor (liberal) or Likud (right-wing), that has been the underlying assumption of this country founded in the aftermath of the Holocaust and driven by its memory.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mahatma Gandhi addressing some of his thousands of followers on a lawn.

Mahatma Gandhi addressing some of his thousands of followers on the lawn of the home of Dr. Ansari where Gandhi stopped during his peace meetings with Viceroy Lord Irwin.

Bettmann/Getty Images

Everyone Wants Peace. That’s the Problem.

In 2007, the United Nations gathered to declare an International Day of Non-Violence. It fittingly chose Gandhi’s birthday, October 2nd, for the occasion: a day to affirm “the universal relevance of the principle of non-violence” and strive toward a common culture of tolerance and understanding.

The resolution passed by consensus, co-sponsored by 140 member nations. Each attested to what nearly everyone believes: that they—their culture, their country, their party, their movement—want peace.

Keep ReadingShow less
The U.S. Capitol in autumn.

New surveys of nearly 20,000 battleground voters find bipartisan majorities say Congress ignores the public, and that more public influence would help.

Philip Yabut/Getty Images

Americans Say the People Can Lead Congress to Common Ground; It Appears They Are Right

New surveys in battleground states and districts across the country, as well as nationwide, find that Americans—both Republicans and Democrats—believe Congress does what most Americans would do less than half the time.

They also found that majorities agree that if Congress were to be more influenced by the people, it would be more likely to find common ground. In fact, surveys show that majorities of Republicans and Democrats agree on what to do about many issues that Congress is stuck on.

Keep ReadingShow less
Man holding American flag

Is America still great? An immigrant entrepreneur argues that free speech, opportunity, and the rule of law, not military or economic power, are the real test.

Getty Images

This Is What Makes America Great

After World War II, America stood victorious over Germany and Japan. Instead of permanent retribution, it helped them rebuild and welcomed former enemies as partners and allies. For me, that moment signaled America’s greatness: power guided by humanity. America earned something that power alone could never command — the respect and admiration of people around the world.

Today, a question once almost unthinkable is being asked: Is America still great — and will it remain so?

Keep ReadingShow less