Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Don’t give up on democracy, fellow young voters

Opinion

Don’t give up on democracy, fellow young voters

"We have the power to unrig the system. Political apathy is not the answer," argues Amanda Shafer.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Shafer, a junior at the University of California, Berkeley, is the director of external affairs for BridgeUSA, a national, student-run organization seeking to depolarize college campuses and increase youth civic engagement.

Do you feel like your vote actually matters? I sure don't. Though I proudly registered two years ago on my 18th birthday at city hall in my Chicago suburb, and have voted in every single election since, I know my vote does not truly matter. It is a drop in a bucket in a safe district.

The reality is, most of our votes do not matter; 85 percent of House districts are not in jeopardy for the party that holds the seat. Millions are misrepresented by politicians they oppose. Candidates from third parties, who may be most representative of a district, are dismissed as "spoilers" ruining the election for the two-party duopoly. And safe districts encourage candidates to pull away from the middle to win primaries, but never move back in time for an assured victory in the general election.

We all know the troubles riddling the Electoral College — from granting a voter in Wyoming 57 times the voting power as a voter in California, to giving a single white voter the power of 1.05 voters but an Asian voter the influence of 0.58 of a vote. This system has grown horribly out of step with the wishes of the majority; three out of the five instances of a popularly elected candidate losing an electoral vote occurred in the past 16 years.


As young people flock to coastal urban areas, their votes matter less and less in "safe" states and districts. Despite "one person, one vote," gerrymandered House districts and the Electoral College clearly favor a particular kind of voter: rural, older and white, stacking our democracy against the increasingly young and diverse populace the millennial and Gen Z generations are creating.

Uncompetitive House races and a rigged presidential electoral system have contributed to political polarization, grinding governance to a standstill. Despite mounting crises — climate change, vast wealth inequality, ballooning student loan debt and unprecedented levels of gun violence, to name a few —- our politics has become polarized to the point of being ineffectual. Obstructionism has become a winning political tactic, leaving massive societal ailments to worsen.

Millennials and Gen Zers look at this disfunction and increasingly dismiss politics as impossibly gridlocked and incapable, fueling vast political apathy in the leaders of tomorrow. Older generations love pushing the narrative that "young people don't vote." But with a rigged, uncompetitive democracy and an impossibly polarized government, it's no wonder young people don't think the answer lies in government.

We, the young adults, should not discount government, though. We can and should aim to make democracy work once more. And democracy reforms should be an American issue, not a partisan one. Come 2020, millennials and Gen Zers will comprise the largest bloc of eligible voters, outpacing the long-dominant baby boomer generation. We have the power to engage with democracy and demand systemic change to address the crises our government is failing to act upon.

If we want to solve the issues defining our generations' struggles, we have to make our voices heard. We need to vote. We need to knock on doors for a candidate we support, or at the very least post Instagram stories about political issues we care about. If we want to enact change, we need to take our rightful seat at the long table of democracy and start advocating for ourselves.

At BridgeUSA, the leading multipartisan organization on college campuses, we work for students to actively engage with our democracy through the "bridge mindset." To mitigate polarization, we encourage students to explore ideas and learn to articulate their preferences through civil discourse. In doing so, we create empathetic young leaders excited to join the political process in productive ways.

Sharpening youth political engagement is certainly the first step. But once we begin to fulfill our civic duty as active citizens, we need to demand changes to make our democracy more democratic. A laundry list of effective reforms would be effective, and they can be boiled down to simply: Unrig our elections to make them more democratic.

Ridding the system of institutions that enable tyranny of the minority should be the first step. Since abolishing the Electoral College is a pipe dream, we should urge our state elected officials to embrace the interstate compact under which a state's electors are committed to vote for the candidate who wins the national popular vote. If states with a combined 270 of the 538 electoral votes do this, we can achieve a system where every individual vote does matter.

Our election maps are also hopelessly gerrymandered to favor the incumbent party that drew the lines. Just looking at Maryland, Illinois, North Carolina and Pennsylvania reveals the transpartisan appeal to ending this: Both parties use it to disadvantage the other, so both parties should have a stake in ending it to make our elections more competitive and ensure our representatives are truly representative of their states. Seventeen states have adopted independent commissions, or other innovative measures that remove power from legislators' hands, to draw their lines following the 2020 census. Hopefully more will follow.

American democracy, despite how broken and dysfunctional it is currently, can be saved. But it requires young people to engage the system and press for change. If not us, the older politicians who continue to benefit from the system will never concede power by altering it. We have the power to unrig the system. Political apathy is not the answer. As a generation, we must turn to peaceful activism and civic engagement to demand a government that listens to us and a democracy that works for every American.


Read More

President Trump answers questions from reporters.

U.S. President Donald Trump answers questions from reporters before boarding Air Force One on August 21, 2026 in Joint Base Andrews, Maryland.

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Trump’s White House Press Ban Violates 1st Amendment

The principle is simple. Just like politicians are not supposed to pick their voters, government officials don’t get to pick the reporters who cover them.

If they did, the First Amendment would be meaningless. and we would no longer live in anything resembling a constitutional republic. That is why President Trump’s September 18 announcement that he is banning reporters from CNN, MSNow, and Politico from the White House is so dangerous.

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

The CLARITY Act crypto bill failed a procedural vote on Sept. 15, but it could return. Here's what it does, who would regulate crypto, and the Trump angle.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

The CLARITY Act

The CLARITY Act

The CLARITY Act, which failed in a procedural vote on Sept. 15, and a new venture by the Trump family’s World Liberty Financial cryptocurrency company made us think it was time to write about the cryptocurrency legislation. Even though it’s not currently active, the bill could come back.

Keep ReadingShow less
When Money Trumps Life

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during the 81st session of the United Nations (U.N.) General Assembly at U.N. Headquarters on September 22, 2026 in New York City.

Alexi J. Rosenfeld/Getty Images

When Money Trumps Life

Last week at the United Nations, Donald Trump showed the world just how little he values human life. In a single speech, he rattled off a laundry list of “hoaxes” to write off: climate change, AI, “Russia hoax,” “Ukraine hoax,” and more. Climate change, AI, and modern warfare all pose existential threats to civilization as we know it, and yet our president seems hellbent on gaslighting our fears while accelerating problems that threaten our survival. What would make a person behave in such a self-sabotaging way? Well, perhaps we should, as they say, follow the money.

Earlier this month, the UN warned that Earth is already 1.4°C hotter than before the industrial age and set to blow past the 1.5°C limit in the next few years. The World Health Organization projects that such warming will cause roughly 250,000 additional deaths a year starting in 2030. Any leader who values human life should recognize this as the existential threat it is and change course. Instead, Trump has pulled the U.S. out of the UN's founding climate treaty, and his EPA scrapped the scientific finding underpinning federal limits on greenhouse gas emissions. Meanwhile, in the first six months since launching his war in Iran, Trump's nine largest oil and gas holdings gained up to $4.4 million.

Keep ReadingShow less
 U.S. President Donald Trump speaks from the Cross Hall of the White House on April 1, 2026 in Washington, DC.

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks from the Cross Hall of the White House on April 1, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Pool/Getty Images

How Presidential Primetime Addresses Shape Public Trust in Democratic Institutions

A question still being studied is the effects on public trust when the head of the Executive casts doubt on the institutions that run elections, enforce laws, and decide legal disputes. The President of the United States is arguably the most powerful man in the world. He is the commander in chief of a nation #1 in nominal gross domestic product as well as #1 in military power, budget, and spending as of 2026. The actions he takes spew ripple effects across the world and follow many generations. A way you can measure the executive's power can also be measured in how much influence his speeches have on the markets, opinions of the masses, news outlets, lawmakers, social media reactions, etc. His framing of an issue can shape the next day’s political conversation.

These conversations become extremely dangerous/consequential when discussing a principle as embedded in our country as Democracy. In his July primetime speech, Trump continued to pedal the claims about election security and argued for stricter voting rules. He continued to portray the country as facing a moment of corruption and uncertainty, followed by presenting himself as the one prepared to restore order. The address continued with repeated claims about his loss in the 2020 election that have not been supported by the evidence compiled over years of investigation by many parties. Professional reviews, audits, and courts have yet to find significant evidence of foul play substantial enough to influence the outcome of that election.

Keep ReadingShow less